Global fallback for missing calls to Skip.If() #27
Comments
|
What is a 'global fallback'? |
|
Some kind of a default action set in config file or global state.
… On 4 Sep 2022, at 17:08, Andrew Arnott ***@***.***> wrote:
What is a 'global fallback'?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
|
|
I'm afraid I'm still not understanding. Can you provide an example? From the test extension's perspective, we have 0 insight into whether the test method may or may not execute a |
|
I would like the default behavior to be skipped. I can see that this is
technically not possible, because you have to run something. But if a call
to `Skip.If` was never called, then the test could fail with a message
explaining what was forgotten.
…On Sun, Sep 4, 2022 at 10:34 PM Andrew Arnott ***@***.***> wrote:
I'm afraid I'm still not understanding. Can you provide an example?
From the test extension's perspective, we have 0 insight into whether the
test method may or may not execute a Skip.If() call before the test
method is executed. And if the test method executes and Skip is never
called, we can't tell that either. And even if we could tell, it's
perfectly valid for a branch in the test to have skipped the call to
Skip.If. What would this 'default action' do anyway?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#27 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAD3IM6ETJ7FS2VLTDTBFKLV4UBUJANCNFSM6AAAAAAQC6YRME>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
Sorry. That would be a significant breaking change, and force a bunch of users' tests to put in a stub |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Would it be possible to create a global fallback for missing calls to
Skip.If(...)?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: