Skip to content

Comparison with estimate_, simulate_, and forecast_ secondary from EpiNow2? #3

@seabbs

Description

@seabbs

I think the intended use case of this package is really nice - we did exactly this process in the pandemic for our forecasting (it seemed to work well)

As part of that we implemented estimate_secondary, simulate_secondary, and forecast_secondary in EpiNow2 (https://epiforecasts.io/EpiNow2/dev/reference/estimate_secondary.html, https://epiforecasts.io/EpiNow2/dev/reference/simulate_secondary.html, and https://epiforecasts.io/EpiNow2/dev/reference/forecast_secondary.html). I would be really keen to see a comparison between the two if there is interest? Just looking at the docs they could use some TLC any input on that would be very welcome (or any other contributions). I think the simulate_ is the closest in terms of utility?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions