Skip to content

phase-12-testing-validation.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
184 lines (142 loc) · 8.35 KB

phase-12-testing-validation.md

File metadata and controls

184 lines (142 loc) · 8.35 KB

PHASE 12 — TESTING & VALIDATION

AI-Driven Criminal Intelligence Platform

1. Objective

Prove the system is safe, accurate, fair, and resilient through comprehensive testing — covering functional correctness, ML performance, bias regression, adversarial robustness, and operational resilience.

Inputs

  • All system components (Phases 1–11)
  • Success metrics (Phase 0)
  • Fairness thresholds (Phase 3)
  • Red-team results (Phase 11)

Outputs

  • Test strategy with coverage matrix
  • Test execution reports
  • Go / No-Go criteria for pilot deployment

2. Test Strategy

2.1 Test Pyramid

graph TB
    E2E["E2E / Integration Tests<br/>~50 tests | Slowest"]
    Integration["System Integration Tests<br/>~200 tests"]
    ML["ML Validation Tests<br/>~100 tests"]
    Bias["Bias & Fairness Tests<br/>~50 tests"]
    Unit["Unit Tests<br/>~500 tests | Fastest"]

    Unit --- Bias --- ML --- Integration --- E2E
Loading

2.2 Test Coverage Matrix

Test Category Scope Count Automation Frequency
Unit tests Feature engineering, data validation, API logic ~500 100% automated Every commit
Bias & fairness All model outputs against fairness thresholds ~50 100% automated Every model build
ML validation Accuracy, calibration, drift on held-out data ~100 100% automated Every model build
Integration Service-to-service, pipeline end-to-end ~200 90% automated Daily
E2E Full user workflows (investigator dashboard) ~50 80% automated (Playwright) Daily
Performance Latency, throughput, scaling ~30 100% automated Weekly
Security Pen testing, vulnerability scanning ~30 60% automated Weekly + pre-deploy
Adversarial ML Evasion, poisoning, inversion attempts ~20 50% automated Monthly + pre-deploy
Chaos / Resilience Component failure, network partition ~15 70% automated Monthly

3. ML-Specific Tests

3.1 Accuracy Under Stress

Test Description Pass Criteria
Baseline comparison Every model outperforms all baselines (Phase 5) AUC, F1, PAI all exceed baselines
Temporal generalization Performance on 3+ walk-forward folds Metric variance < 10% across folds
Sparse data Performance on grid cells with < 10 historical events Graceful degradation; no wild predictions
Cold start Performance on brand-new areas (no history) System returns "insufficient data" rather than guess
Event surge Performance during 5× normal event volume Latency within SLA; accuracy does not degrade > 5%
Data quality degradation 10%, 20%, 30% missing features Graceful degradation curve documented

3.2 Bias Regression Tests

Test Description Pass Criteria
Geographic disparity Prediction rate ratio across areas ≤ 3.0 (Phase 3 threshold)
Prediction parity P(positive) ratio across groups 0.8 – 1.25
FPR parity False-positive rate ratio 0.8 – 1.25
Calibration parity ECE difference across groups ≤ 0.05
Historical amplification Prediction concentration over time Non-increasing trend
New data bias Bias metrics after retraining on new data All metrics within thresholds

3.3 Adversarial Input Tests

Test Attack Type Description Pass Criteria
Feature perturbation Evasion Slight modifications to input features Prediction change < 15%
Outlier injection Poisoning Inject statistical outliers into feature store Anomaly detection flags within 1h
Systematic bias injection Poisoning Inject data skewed toward one area Bias metrics alert within 24h
Model query flood Inversion 10,000 rapid queries with small variations Rate limiter engages; no data leaks

4. System Integration Tests

4.1 Pipeline Tests

Test Path Pass Criteria
Batch ingestion → Data Lake → Feature Store → Prediction Full batch pipeline End-to-end in < 30 min
Event → Kafka → Flink → Alert → Dashboard Full streaming pipeline End-to-end in < 5 sec (p95)
New FIR → Similarity Search → Investigator Queue Forensic pipeline Results in < 30 sec
Ethics gate blocks biased output Inference → Ethics → Suppression 100% of test biased outputs blocked
Audit log captures all events Any action → Audit store 0 unlogged events in test suite

4.2 Failure & Recovery Tests

Test Scenario Pass Criteria
Kafka broker failure Kill 1 of 5 brokers No data loss; recovery < 30 sec
Feature store failure Redis cluster down Serve predictions with degraded features; alert fires
Model serving crash Kill inference service Auto-restart < 60 sec; serve stale predictions meanwhile
Database failover Kill primary PostgreSQL Replica promotes < 30 sec; no data loss
Network partition Split Flink from Kafka Backpressure engages; recover after heal
Full DC failure Simulate DR scenario DR site serves (degraded) within 4 hours

5. Performance Tests

Test Method Target Tool
Streaming throughput Generate 10,000 events/sec Process without lag Kafka load generator
API latency 100 concurrent users, mixed queries p95 < 500ms k6 / Locust
Dashboard load time Full page with map + charts + alerts First meaningful paint < 2 sec Lighthouse
Feature store lookup 1,000 concurrent lookups p95 < 10ms Redis benchmark
Batch pipeline duration Full daily run with 500K records Complete < 30 min Timed execution
Model inference latency Single prediction request p95 < 100ms Custom benchmark
Concurrent model inference 500 concurrent inference requests p95 < 500ms k6

6. User Acceptance Tests (UAT)

Participants: 5–10 Investigators + 2–3 Analysts + 1 Ethics Officer

# Scenario Success Criteria
1 View hotspot predictions on map User finds relevant area within 30 sec
2 Drill into "Why this hotspot?" User understands top factors
3 Receive and triage a P0 alert User acknowledges within 1 min
4 Search for similar cases User finds relevant matches; trusts results
5 View case timeline User can follow event sequence logically
6 View network graph User understands key connections
7 Dismiss a suggestion with reason Dismissal logged correctly
8 Attempt to access out-of-jurisdiction data Access denied; logged
9 Ethics officer reviews suppression log All suppressions visible with reasons
10 Export data for report Two-person auth enforced

7. Go / No-Go Criteria

Go Criteria (ALL must pass)

# Criterion Threshold
1 All ML models exceed baselines on all evaluation metrics Phase 5 targets met
2 All fairness metrics within thresholds Phase 3 thresholds met
3 Zero critical security vulnerabilities (red-team) 0 critical, ≤ 2 high (with mitigations)
4 Real-time pipeline latency within SLA p95 < 5 sec
5 System availability over 7-day stress test ≥ 99.9%
6 All incident response playbooks tested At least 1 drill per playbook
7 UAT satisfaction ≥ 80% of participants rate "useful"
8 Audit trail complete and tamper-proof 100% coverage verified
9 Ethics review sign-off Ethics Officer + Committee approval
10 Legal review complete Legal counsel confirms compliance

No-Go Conditions (ANY triggers delay)

# Condition Action
1 Any fairness metric outside threshold Block until resolved + re-audited
2 Critical security vulnerability unresolved Block until patched + re-tested
3 Real-time latency p95 > 8 sec Performance optimization sprint
4 UAT satisfaction < 60% UX redesign sprint
5 Ethics Officer withholds sign-off Resolve concerns before proceeding
6 Audit trail has gaps Fix logging; re-test

8. Phase 12 Deliverables Checklist

  • Test strategy with coverage matrix (Section 2)
  • ML-specific tests — accuracy, bias, adversarial (Section 3)
  • System integration tests — pipeline + failure (Section 4)
  • Performance test specification (Section 5)
  • UAT scenarios (Section 6)
  • Go / No-Go criteria (Section 7)