-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 265
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature: Preview/beta releases for improving stability #618
Comments
@techlake - something to look at in the future but I don't think we really have the resources to implement this at the moment. Maybe for new features however bug fixes we can't really avoid pushing new versions - nor do we have the test cases outside of our environments. |
@anwather considering some of the issues (bugs) we had in v10: I think we need to tackle this. |
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/gallery/concepts/module-prerelease-support?view=powershellget-3.x
|
I would suggest using sampler to manage the PowerShell module lifecycle. It offers the following advantages: Immediate benefits using Sampler:
Other features to consider a few later:
|
Adding to backlog |
Closing as discussed with dev team - regression testing has been added to our internal ADO repo which has improved the quality of releases. |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
EPAC pushes new versions and features very frequently. That's great. Recently though, some of these frequent changes have introduced regressions, which is less great.
EPAC manages critical components in production environments. It would be great if new stable releases could get some more testing before they are pushed out. We're currently POC-ing EPAC to replace our current solution, but these frequent breaking changes and regressions makes us a bit hesitant.
One way to achieve both frequent changes and improved stability would be to have prereleases, beta releases. So that's what I suggest.
Describe the solution you'd like
Release beta releases of EPAC to PowerShell Gallery. Then users can:
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
AB#44045
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: