feat: consider making volatileFieldsList a provider level config

[matt-FFFFFF]

I see a welcome change in #687 - this will make the provider behave much better so thanks!

Would you consider making this list a set of strings that we could configure at the provider level?

This might ease maintenance... @ms-henglu

[ms-henglu]

Hi @matt-FFFFFF ,

Thank you for taking time to repot this issue.

I searched for similar fields from all azure resource types, and I think we might not need to change the list very often.

WDYT?

[matt-FFFFFF]

Seems to be working for now I guess let's see how things progress over time :)

[ms-henglu]

Thanks for the confirmation. I'll close this issue but feel free to reopen this issue if there's any question.