redeemtInvite() potential abuse #77
Description
A few small issues and I think we should address the Github generated warnings.
One thing I think we should should consider is that since we don't specify addresses in the signature, the invites can be front run (monitor mempool and send a malicious redeemtInvite() transaction that gets cleared before the honest transaction). I don't think this is something that there's any financial incentive to do, so it's not a huge deal but there is potential for abuse here.
Originally posted by @bagelface in #52 (review)