Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 17, 2024. It is now read-only.

[not a bug, help] - Data written into the file and data on the physical HD do not match #2

Open
newmjw opened this issue Jun 24, 2012 · 5 comments

Comments

@newmjw
Copy link

newmjw commented Jun 24, 2012

Hi Cyberax,

I'm having an issue with the script, I doubt it requires any changes to it, but this is really the only way I could find to contact you.

I just purchased two of the crucial M4 ssds, and set each partition up in a in a raid 1 with MDADM. As far as I can tell, I did everything right, everything is working, except trim. When I use the hdparm fibmap & read-sector test, I do not see zeros, as I did with my old vertex2.

Looking around online, it appears that this is caused by no support for discard in the raid1 module. There's the thread on LWN about a patch, which you have probably read, but it's not committed yet, and it's probably going to be some time before it is.

I bet if I failed the raid and just operated on each drive one at a time, discard would work. I was going to go about figuring out how to do that, but then I found your script, which looks like a perfectly fine work around until the kernel supports it. I did this with wiper.sh for a few years.. I tried the script, but I get stuck at:

print "Checking misalignment signatures"
for sl in slaves.values():
    slave_offset = sl["offset"]*sector_size
    for rng in trim_ranges:
        for test in rng["test_data"].values():
# snip...
            sector_data = data + ' '*padding + data

            what_we_read = string_at(read_buf+read_buf_offset, sector_size)
            if what_we_read != sector_data:
                print "Data written into the file and data on the physical HD do not match!"
                sys.exit(2)

what_we_read is: empty string
sector_data is something like:

Zb45aa627634f4682950f49b4e9e9f8a0


 b45aa627634f4682950f49b4e9e9f8a0A

Any ideas why that would happen and what I can try next to fix it? Is it a hole in the script, or is something horribly wrong with my setup, or even a hardware problem?

Thanks

@pdf
Copy link

pdf commented Sep 18, 2012

Ditto here, would love some direction.

@tomposmiko
Copy link

The same here. Any idea about this issue?

@Cyberax
Copy link
Owner

Cyberax commented Jan 14, 2013

What is the exact model of SSD? I'm going to try and reproduce it. Looks like it's a workaround for 4096-byte-sectors gone wrong somewhere.

@tomposmiko
Copy link

Mine:
Model Number: INTEL SSDSA2CW120G3
Serial Number: CVPR118100ZU120LGN
Firmware Revision: 4PC10302

Thanks.

@persist-zz
Copy link

Similar issue here on a couple OCZ VTX4-25SAT3-64G drives running 1.5 firmware.
However instead of an empty string (unless this is an empty string and I am mistaken) for what_we_read (which appears to be the same character length as sector_data), this is what what_we_read contains:

��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

sector_data:

14d5ec6b71184e29bcd6be62702b6b2b                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                14d5ec6b71184e29bcd6be62702b6b2b

Any updates on the original issue?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants