generated from EI2030/working-group
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
Apple didn't revolutionize power supplies; new transistors did.html
5345 lines (4972 loc) · 285 KB
/
Apple didn't revolutionize power supplies; new transistors did.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<!DOCTYPE html>
<!-- saved from url=(0066)http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html -->
<html class="v2" dir="ltr" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:b="http://www.google.com/2005/gml/b" xmlns:data="http://www.google.com/2005/gml/data" xmlns:expr="http://www.google.com/2005/gml/expr"><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<link href="./Apple didn't revolutionize power supplies; new transistors did_files/3566091532-css_bundle_v2.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
<meta content="width=1100" name="viewport">
<meta content="blogger" name="generator">
<link href="http://www.righto.com/favicon.ico" rel="icon" type="image/x-icon">
<link href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html" rel="canonical">
<link rel="alternate" type="application/atom+xml" title="Ken Shirriff's blog - Atom" href="http://www.righto.com/feeds/posts/default">
<link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="Ken Shirriff's blog - RSS" href="http://www.righto.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss">
<link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" title="Ken Shirriff's blog - Atom" href="https://www.blogger.com/feeds/6264947694886887540/posts/default">
<link rel="alternate" type="application/atom+xml" title="Ken Shirriff's blog - Atom" href="http://www.righto.com/feeds/8980981208464913906/comments/default">
<!--Can't find substitution for tag [blog.ieCssRetrofitLinks]-->
<link href="./Apple didn't revolutionize power supplies; new transistors did_files/apple2-psu.png" rel="image_src">
<meta content="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html" property="og:url">
<meta content="Apple didn't revolutionize power supplies; new transistors did" property="og:title">
<meta content=" The new biography Steve Jobs contains a remarkable claim about the power supply of the Apple II and its designer Rod Holt: [1] Instead o..." property="og:description">
<meta content="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AAOd8MyM04Y8PIB3pcTr2-V1cSxZNN5aR900af5rp575pW4dcOR-mCHQjSvHlZy1B4p8VX-IR3y0mfQPyqs8qqtEcCfgDkf9UK69BU-nolzge2CkP5k=w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu" property="og:image">
<title>Apple didn't revolutionize power supplies; new transistors did</title>
<style type="text/css">@font-face{font-family:'Play';font-style:normal;font-weight:400;src:url(//fonts.gstatic.com/s/play/v19/6aez4K2oVqwIvtU2Gg.ttf)format('truetype');}</style>
<style id="page-skin-1" type="text/css"><!--
/*
-----------------------------------------------
Blogger Template Style
Name: Simple
Designer: Blogger
URL: www.blogger.com
----------------------------------------------- */
/* Variable definitions
====================
<Variable name="keycolor" description="Main Color" type="color" default="#66bbdd"/>
<Group description="Page Text" selector="body">
<Variable name="body.font" description="Font" type="font"
default="normal normal 12px Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif"/>
<Variable name="body.text.color" description="Text Color" type="color" default="#222222"/>
</Group>
<Group description="Backgrounds" selector=".body-fauxcolumns-outer">
<Variable name="body.background.color" description="Outer Background" type="color" default="#66bbdd"/>
<Variable name="content.background.color" description="Main Background" type="color" default="#ffffff"/>
<Variable name="header.background.color" description="Header Background" type="color" default="transparent"/>
</Group>
<Group description="Links" selector=".main-outer">
<Variable name="link.color" description="Link Color" type="color" default="#2288bb"/>
<Variable name="link.visited.color" description="Visited Color" type="color" default="#888888"/>
<Variable name="link.hover.color" description="Hover Color" type="color" default="#33aaff"/>
</Group>
<Group description="Blog Title" selector=".header h1">
<Variable name="header.font" description="Font" type="font"
default="normal normal 60px Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif"/>
<Variable name="header.text.color" description="Title Color" type="color" default="#3399bb" />
</Group>
<Group description="Blog Description" selector=".header .description">
<Variable name="description.text.color" description="Description Color" type="color"
default="#777777" />
</Group>
<Group description="Tabs Text" selector=".tabs-inner .widget li a">
<Variable name="tabs.font" description="Font" type="font"
default="normal normal 14px Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif"/>
<Variable name="tabs.text.color" description="Text Color" type="color" default="#999999"/>
<Variable name="tabs.selected.text.color" description="Selected Color" type="color" default="#000000"/>
</Group>
<Group description="Tabs Background" selector=".tabs-outer .PageList">
<Variable name="tabs.background.color" description="Background Color" type="color" default="#f5f5f5"/>
<Variable name="tabs.selected.background.color" description="Selected Color" type="color" default="#eeeeee"/>
</Group>
<Group description="Post Title" selector="h3.post-title, .comments h4">
<Variable name="post.title.font" description="Font" type="font"
default="normal normal 22px Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif"/>
</Group>
<Group description="Date Header" selector=".date-header">
<Variable name="date.header.color" description="Text Color" type="color"
default="#222222"/>
<Variable name="date.header.background.color" description="Background Color" type="color"
default="transparent"/>
<Variable name="date.header.font" description="Text Font" type="font"
default="normal bold 11px Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif"/>
<Variable name="date.header.padding" description="Date Header Padding" type="string" default="inherit"/>
<Variable name="date.header.letterspacing" description="Date Header Letter Spacing" type="string" default="inherit"/>
<Variable name="date.header.margin" description="Date Header Margin" type="string" default="inherit"/>
</Group>
<Group description="Post Footer" selector=".post-footer">
<Variable name="post.footer.text.color" description="Text Color" type="color" default="#666666"/>
<Variable name="post.footer.background.color" description="Background Color" type="color"
default="#f9f9f9"/>
<Variable name="post.footer.border.color" description="Shadow Color" type="color" default="#eeeeee"/>
</Group>
<Group description="Gadgets" selector="h2">
<Variable name="widget.title.font" description="Title Font" type="font"
default="normal bold 11px Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif"/>
<Variable name="widget.title.text.color" description="Title Color" type="color" default="#000000"/>
<Variable name="widget.alternate.text.color" description="Alternate Color" type="color" default="#999999"/>
</Group>
<Group description="Images" selector=".main-inner">
<Variable name="image.background.color" description="Background Color" type="color" default="#ffffff"/>
<Variable name="image.border.color" description="Border Color" type="color" default="#eeeeee"/>
<Variable name="image.text.color" description="Caption Text Color" type="color" default="#222222"/>
</Group>
<Group description="Accents" selector=".content-inner">
<Variable name="body.rule.color" description="Separator Line Color" type="color" default="#eeeeee"/>
<Variable name="tabs.border.color" description="Tabs Border Color" type="color" default="#eeeeee"/>
</Group>
<Variable name="body.background" description="Body Background" type="background"
color="#f6fbf6" default="$(color) none repeat scroll top left"/>
<Variable name="body.background.override" description="Body Background Override" type="string" default=""/>
<Variable name="body.background.gradient.cap" description="Body Gradient Cap" type="url"
default="url(https://resources.blogblog.com/blogblog/data/1kt/simple/gradients_light.png)"/>
<Variable name="body.background.gradient.tile" description="Body Gradient Tile" type="url"
default="url(https://resources.blogblog.com/blogblog/data/1kt/simple/body_gradient_tile_light.png)"/>
<Variable name="content.background.color.selector" description="Content Background Color Selector" type="string" default=".content-inner"/>
<Variable name="content.padding" description="Content Padding" type="length" default="10px" min="0" max="100px"/>
<Variable name="content.padding.horizontal" description="Content Horizontal Padding" type="length" default="10px" min="0" max="100px"/>
<Variable name="content.shadow.spread" description="Content Shadow Spread" type="length" default="40px" min="0" max="100px"/>
<Variable name="content.shadow.spread.webkit" description="Content Shadow Spread (WebKit)" type="length" default="5px" min="0" max="100px"/>
<Variable name="content.shadow.spread.ie" description="Content Shadow Spread (IE)" type="length" default="10px" min="0" max="100px"/>
<Variable name="main.border.width" description="Main Border Width" type="length" default="0" min="0" max="10px"/>
<Variable name="header.background.gradient" description="Header Gradient" type="url" default="none"/>
<Variable name="header.shadow.offset.left" description="Header Shadow Offset Left" type="length" default="-1px" min="-50px" max="50px"/>
<Variable name="header.shadow.offset.top" description="Header Shadow Offset Top" type="length" default="-1px" min="-50px" max="50px"/>
<Variable name="header.shadow.spread" description="Header Shadow Spread" type="length" default="1px" min="0" max="100px"/>
<Variable name="header.padding" description="Header Padding" type="length" default="30px" min="0" max="100px"/>
<Variable name="header.border.size" description="Header Border Size" type="length" default="1px" min="0" max="10px"/>
<Variable name="header.bottom.border.size" description="Header Bottom Border Size" type="length" default="0" min="0" max="10px"/>
<Variable name="header.border.horizontalsize" description="Header Horizontal Border Size" type="length" default="0" min="0" max="10px"/>
<Variable name="description.text.size" description="Description Text Size" type="string" default="140%"/>
<Variable name="tabs.margin.top" description="Tabs Margin Top" type="length" default="0" min="0" max="100px"/>
<Variable name="tabs.margin.side" description="Tabs Side Margin" type="length" default="30px" min="0" max="100px"/>
<Variable name="tabs.background.gradient" description="Tabs Background Gradient" type="url"
default="url(https://resources.blogblog.com/blogblog/data/1kt/simple/gradients_light.png)"/>
<Variable name="tabs.border.width" description="Tabs Border Width" type="length" default="1px" min="0" max="10px"/>
<Variable name="tabs.bevel.border.width" description="Tabs Bevel Border Width" type="length" default="1px" min="0" max="10px"/>
<Variable name="post.margin.bottom" description="Post Bottom Margin" type="length" default="25px" min="0" max="100px"/>
<Variable name="image.border.small.size" description="Image Border Small Size" type="length" default="2px" min="0" max="10px"/>
<Variable name="image.border.large.size" description="Image Border Large Size" type="length" default="5px" min="0" max="10px"/>
<Variable name="page.width.selector" description="Page Width Selector" type="string" default=".region-inner"/>
<Variable name="page.width" description="Page Width" type="string" default="auto"/>
<Variable name="main.section.margin" description="Main Section Margin" type="length" default="15px" min="0" max="100px"/>
<Variable name="main.padding" description="Main Padding" type="length" default="15px" min="0" max="100px"/>
<Variable name="main.padding.top" description="Main Padding Top" type="length" default="30px" min="0" max="100px"/>
<Variable name="main.padding.bottom" description="Main Padding Bottom" type="length" default="30px" min="0" max="100px"/>
<Variable name="paging.background"
color="#ffffff"
description="Background of blog paging area" type="background"
default="transparent none no-repeat scroll top center"/>
<Variable name="footer.bevel" description="Bevel border length of footer" type="length" default="0" min="0" max="10px"/>
<Variable name="mobile.background.overlay" description="Mobile Background Overlay" type="string"
default="transparent none repeat scroll top left"/>
<Variable name="mobile.background.size" description="Mobile Background Size" type="string" default="auto"/>
<Variable name="mobile.button.color" description="Mobile Button Color" type="color" default="#ffffff" />
<Variable name="startSide" description="Side where text starts in blog language" type="automatic" default="left"/>
<Variable name="endSide" description="Side where text ends in blog language" type="automatic" default="right"/>
*/
/* Content
----------------------------------------------- */
body {
font: normal normal 14px Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;
color: #222222;
background: #f6fbf6 none repeat scroll top left;
padding: 0 40px 40px 40px;
}
html body .region-inner {
min-width: 0;
max-width: 100%;
width: auto;
}
h2 {
font-size: 22px;
}
a:link {
text-decoration:none;
color: #121fb3;
}
a:visited {
text-decoration:none;
color: #121fb3;
}
a:hover {
text-decoration:underline;
color: #1a00ff;
}
.body-fauxcolumn-outer .fauxcolumn-inner {
background: transparent url(//www.blogblog.com/1kt/simple/body_gradient_tile_light.png) repeat scroll top left;
_background-image: none;
}
.body-fauxcolumn-outer .cap-top {
position: absolute;
z-index: 1;
height: 400px;
width: 100%;
}
.body-fauxcolumn-outer .cap-top .cap-left {
width: 100%;
background: transparent url(//www.blogblog.com/1kt/simple/gradients_light.png) repeat-x scroll top left;
_background-image: none;
}
.content-outer {
-moz-box-shadow: 0 0 40px rgba(0, 0, 0, .15);
-webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 5px rgba(0, 0, 0, .15);
-goog-ms-box-shadow: 0 0 10px #333333;
box-shadow: 0 0 40px rgba(0, 0, 0, .15);
margin-bottom: 1px;
}
.content-inner {
padding: 10px 10px;
}
.content-inner {
background-color: #ffffff;
}
/* Header
----------------------------------------------- */
.header-outer {
background: #f6fbf7 url(//www.blogblog.com/1kt/simple/gradients_light.png) repeat-x scroll 0 -400px;
_background-image: none;
}
.Header h1 {
font: normal normal 42px Play;
color: #666666;
text-shadow: 1px 2px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, .2);
}
.Header h1 a {
color: #666666;
}
.Header .description {
font-size: 140%;
color: #666666;
}
.header-inner .Header .titlewrapper {
padding: 22px 30px;
}
.header-inner .Header .descriptionwrapper {
padding: 0 30px;
}
/* Tabs
----------------------------------------------- */
.tabs-inner .section:first-child {
border-top: 0 solid #eeeeee;
}
.tabs-inner .section:first-child ul {
margin-top: -0;
border-top: 0 solid #eeeeee;
border-left: 0 solid #eeeeee;
border-right: 0 solid #eeeeee;
}
.tabs-inner .widget ul {
background: #f5f5f5 url(//www.blogblog.com/1kt/simple/gradients_light.png) repeat-x scroll 0 -800px;
_background-image: none;
border-bottom: 1px solid #eeeeee;
margin-top: 0;
margin-left: -30px;
margin-right: -30px;
}
.tabs-inner .widget li a {
display: inline-block;
padding: .6em 1em;
font: normal normal 14px Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;
color: #999999;
border-left: 1px solid #ffffff;
border-right: 1px solid #eeeeee;
}
.tabs-inner .widget li:first-child a {
border-left: none;
}
.tabs-inner .widget li.selected a, .tabs-inner .widget li a:hover {
color: #000000;
background-color: #eeeeee;
text-decoration: none;
}
/* Columns
----------------------------------------------- */
.main-outer {
border-top: 0 solid #eeeeee;
}
.fauxcolumn-left-outer .fauxcolumn-inner {
border-right: 1px solid #eeeeee;
}
.fauxcolumn-right-outer .fauxcolumn-inner {
border-left: 1px solid #eeeeee;
}
/* Headings
----------------------------------------------- */
div.widget > h2,
div.widget h2.title {
margin: 0 0 1em 0;
font: normal bold 11px Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;
color: #000000;
}
/* Widgets
----------------------------------------------- */
.widget .zippy {
color: #999999;
text-shadow: 2px 2px 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, .1);
}
.widget .popular-posts ul {
list-style: none;
}
/* Posts
----------------------------------------------- */
h2.date-header {
font: normal bold 11px Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;
}
.date-header span {
background-color: transparent;
color: transparent;
padding: inherit;
letter-spacing: inherit;
margin: inherit;
}
.main-inner {
padding-top: 30px;
padding-bottom: 30px;
}
.main-inner .column-center-inner {
padding: 0 15px;
}
.main-inner .column-center-inner .section {
margin: 0 15px;
}
.post {
margin: 0 0 25px 0;
}
h3.post-title, .comments h4 {
font: normal normal 22px Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;
margin: .75em 0 0;
}
.post-body {
font-size: 110%;
line-height: 1.4;
position: relative;
}
.post-body img, .post-body .tr-caption-container, .Profile img, .Image img,
.BlogList .item-thumbnail img {
padding: 2px;
background: #ffffff;
border: 1px solid #ffffff;
-moz-box-shadow: 1px 1px 5px rgba(0, 0, 0, .1);
-webkit-box-shadow: 1px 1px 5px rgba(0, 0, 0, .1);
box-shadow: 1px 1px 5px rgba(0, 0, 0, .1);
}
.post-body img, .post-body .tr-caption-container {
padding: 5px;
}
.post-body .tr-caption-container {
color: #222222;
}
.post-body .tr-caption-container img {
padding: 0;
background: transparent;
border: none;
-moz-box-shadow: 0 0 0 rgba(0, 0, 0, .1);
-webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 0 rgba(0, 0, 0, .1);
box-shadow: 0 0 0 rgba(0, 0, 0, .1);
}
.post-header {
margin: 0 0 1.5em;
line-height: 1.6;
font-size: 90%;
}
.post-footer {
margin: 20px -2px 0;
padding: 5px 10px;
color: #666666;
background-color: #f9f9f9;
border-bottom: 1px solid #eeeeee;
line-height: 1.6;
font-size: 90%;
}
#comments .comment-author {
padding-top: 1.5em;
border-top: 1px solid #eeeeee;
background-position: 0 1.5em;
}
#comments .comment-author:first-child {
padding-top: 0;
border-top: none;
}
.avatar-image-container {
margin: .2em 0 0;
}
#comments .avatar-image-container img {
border: 1px solid #ffffff;
}
/* Comments
----------------------------------------------- */
.comments .comments-content .icon.blog-author {
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-image: url();
}
.comments .comments-content .loadmore a {
border-top: 1px solid #999999;
border-bottom: 1px solid #999999;
}
.comments .comment-thread.inline-thread {
background-color: #f9f9f9;
}
.comments .continue {
border-top: 2px solid #999999;
}
/* Accents
---------------------------------------------- */
.section-columns td.columns-cell {
border-left: 1px solid #eeeeee;
}
.blog-pager {
background: transparent none no-repeat scroll top center;
}
.blog-pager-older-link, .home-link,
.blog-pager-newer-link {
background-color: #ffffff;
padding: 5px;
}
.footer-outer {
border-top: 0 dashed #bbbbbb;
}
/* Mobile
----------------------------------------------- */
body.mobile {
background-size: auto;
}
.mobile .body-fauxcolumn-outer {
background: transparent none repeat scroll top left;
}
.mobile .body-fauxcolumn-outer .cap-top {
background-size: 100% auto;
}
.mobile .content-outer {
-webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, .15);
box-shadow: 0 0 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, .15);
}
.mobile .tabs-inner .widget ul {
margin-left: 0;
margin-right: 0;
}
.mobile .post {
margin: 0;
}
.mobile .main-inner .column-center-inner .section {
margin: 0;
}
.mobile .date-header span {
padding: 0.1em 10px;
margin: 0 -10px;
}
.mobile h3.post-title {
margin: 0;
}
.mobile .blog-pager {
background: transparent none no-repeat scroll top center;
}
.mobile .footer-outer {
border-top: none;
}
.mobile .main-inner, .mobile .footer-inner {
background-color: #ffffff;
}
.mobile-index-contents {
color: #222222;
}
.mobile-link-button {
background-color: #121fb3;
}
.mobile-link-button a:link, .mobile-link-button a:visited {
color: #ffffff;
}
.mobile .tabs-inner .section:first-child {
border-top: none;
}
.mobile .tabs-inner .PageList .widget-content {
background-color: #eeeeee;
color: #000000;
border-top: 1px solid #eeeeee;
border-bottom: 1px solid #eeeeee;
}
.mobile .tabs-inner .PageList .widget-content .pagelist-arrow {
border-left: 1px solid #eeeeee;
}
.content-outer {
max-width: 1400px !important;
}
/* fix header */
#header-inner {
width: 100% !important;
background-position: right !important;
}
.titlewrapper {
padding: 11px 30px 0 !important;
}
.descriptionwrapper {
margin-bottom: 0 !important;
}
.description {
font-size: 120% !important;
}
/* suppress things */
.date-header {
display: none;
}
#Attribution1 {
display: none;
}
.post-author, .post-timestamp, .reaction-buttons {
display: none;
}
/* h2: sidebar titles */
/* h3: post title */
.post-title , .entry-title {
font-size: 180% !important;
margin-top: 0 !important;
}
.entry-title a:link, .entry-title a:visited, .entry-title a:active{
color: #a03;
}
#main h2 {
color:#333;
margin-bottom:.4em;
margin-top: 13px;
font-size:140%;
}
#main h3 {
color:#333;
margin-bottom:.4em;
margin-top: 13px;
font-size:110%;
}
#main h4 {
color:#333;
margin-bottom:.5em;
}
#sidebar-right-1 a:link, #sidebar-right-1 a:visited, #sidebar-right-1 a:active {
color: #666;
}
#sidebar-right-1 h2 {
font-size: 100%;
color: #666;
}
/* disable image box */
element.style {
}
table.chargers img {
height: 18px;
}
table.chargers img {
height: 18px;
}
.post-body img, .post-body .tr-caption-container {
padding: 5px;
}
.post-body img, .post-body .tr-caption-container, .Profile img, .Image img, .BlogList .item-thumbnail img {
padding: 0;
background: #ffffff;
border: none;
-moz-box-shadow: none;
-webkit-box-shadow: none;
box-shadow: none;
}
/* Special items */
a:link img.hilite, a:visited img.hilite {
color: #888;
}
a:hover img.hilite, a:hover img.hilite2 {
color: #f66;
}
a:active img.hilite {
color: #33c;
}
pre {color:#000000;border:1px solid #000000;}
pre.repl { background-color:#e0e0f0; font-size:120%;}
pre.arc { background-color:#e0e0f0; font-size:120%;}
pre.code { background-color:#e0f0e0; font-size:120%; white-space:pre-wrap;white-space:-moz-pre-wrap;white-space:-pre-wrap;white-space:-o-pre-wrap;word-wrap:break-word;text-wrap:unrestricted;}
code { font-size: 120%;}
blockquote { font-size: 110%; background: transparent url("//static.righto.com/images/blockquote.gif") no-repeat 0 0; margin: 20px 0px; padding: 0px 40px;}
div.cite {font-size: .8em;.; font-style: italic; color: #888; margin-bottom: 9px;}
a.ref { color: gray;vertical-align: super; text-decoration: none; font-size:60%;margin-left: 2px;}
a img.hilite {
border: 1px solid;
color: #888;
z-index: 2;
}
a img.hilite2, a:active img.hilite2 {
border: 1px solid;
color: #f6fbf6;
}
table.chargers {
border-width: 1px;
border-spacing: 2px;
border-style: outset;
border-color: gray;
border-collapse: collapse;
background-color: white;
}
table.chargers th.maker {
padding-right: 5px;
text-align: right;
}
table.chargers th {
border-width: 1px;
padding: 3px;
border-style: inset;
border-color: gray;
background-color: white;
text-align: center;
}
table.chargers img {
height: 18px;
}
table.chargers td {
text-align: center;
border-width: 1px;
padding: 2px 8px;
border-style: inset;
border-color: gray;
background-color: white;
}
--></style>
<style id="template-skin-1" type="text/css"><!--
body {
min-width: 750px;
}
.content-outer, .content-fauxcolumn-outer, .region-inner {
min-width: 750px;
max-width: 750px;
_width: 750px;
}
.main-inner .columns {
padding-left: 0px;
padding-right: 240px;
}
.main-inner .fauxcolumn-center-outer {
left: 0px;
right: 240px;
/* IE6 does not respect left and right together */
_width: expression(this.parentNode.offsetWidth -
parseInt("0px") -
parseInt("240px") + 'px');
}
.main-inner .fauxcolumn-left-outer {
width: 0px;
}
.main-inner .fauxcolumn-right-outer {
width: 240px;
}
.main-inner .column-left-outer {
width: 0px;
right: 100%;
margin-left: -0px;
}
.main-inner .column-right-outer {
width: 240px;
margin-right: -240px;
}
#layout {
min-width: 0;
}
#layout .content-outer {
min-width: 0;
width: 800px;
}
#layout .region-inner {
min-width: 0;
width: auto;
}
--></style>
<script src="./Apple didn't revolutionize power supplies; new transistors did_files/f(11).txt"></script><script src="./Apple didn't revolutionize power supplies; new transistors did_files/f(12).txt"></script><script type="text/javascript" async="" src="./Apple didn't revolutionize power supplies; new transistors did_files/js"></script><script src="./Apple didn't revolutionize power supplies; new transistors did_files/f(13).txt" id="google_shimpl"></script><script async="" src="./Apple didn't revolutionize power supplies; new transistors did_files/analytics.js.download"></script><script type="text/javascript">
(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){i['GoogleAnalyticsObject']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){
(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),
m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)
})(window,document,'script','https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js','ga');
ga('create', 'UA-3782444-1', 'auto', 'blogger');
ga('blogger.send', 'pageview');
</script>
<meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, maximum-scale=12.0, minimum-scale=.25, user-scalable=yes" name="viewport">
<meta content="mw8ww70r3jW0GzXY6j1d" name="follow_it-verification-code">
<link href="./Apple didn't revolutionize power supplies; new transistors did_files/authorization.css" media="all" onload="if(media!='all')media='all'" rel="stylesheet"><noscript><link href='https://www.blogger.com/dyn-css/authorization.css?targetBlogID=6264947694886887540&zx=00d04aa0-adb5-49bf-89e4-7f5f71a71d87' rel='stylesheet'/></noscript>
<meta name="google-adsense-platform-account" content="ca-host-pub-1556223355139109">
<meta name="google-adsense-platform-domain" content="blogspot.com">
<!-- data-ad-client=ca-pub-0159785530845184 -->
<meta http-equiv="origin-trial" content="A7CQXglZzTrThjGTBEn1rWTxHOEtkWivwzgea+NjyardrwlieSjVuyG44PkYgIPGs8Q9svD8sF3Yedn0BBBjXAkAAACFeyJvcmlnaW4iOiJodHRwczovL2RvdWJsZWNsaWNrLm5ldDo0NDMiLCJmZWF0dXJlIjoiUHJpdmFjeVNhbmRib3hBZHNBUElzIiwiZXhwaXJ5IjoxNjk1MTY3OTk5LCJpc1N1YmRvbWFpbiI6dHJ1ZSwiaXNUaGlyZFBhcnR5Ijp0cnVlfQ=="><meta http-equiv="origin-trial" content="A3vKT9yxRPjmXN3DpIiz58f5JykcWHjUo/W7hvmtjgh9jPpQgem9VbADiNovG8NkO6mRmk70Kex8/KUqAYWVWAEAAACLeyJvcmlnaW4iOiJodHRwczovL2dvb2dsZXN5bmRpY2F0aW9uLmNvbTo0NDMiLCJmZWF0dXJlIjoiUHJpdmFjeVNhbmRib3hBZHNBUElzIiwiZXhwaXJ5IjoxNjk1MTY3OTk5LCJpc1N1YmRvbWFpbiI6dHJ1ZSwiaXNUaGlyZFBhcnR5Ijp0cnVlfQ=="><meta http-equiv="origin-trial" content="A4A26Ymj79UVY7C7JGUS4BG1s7MdcDokAQf/RP0paks+RoTYbXHxceT/5L4iKcsleFCngi75YfNRGW2+SpVv1ggAAACLeyJvcmlnaW4iOiJodHRwczovL2dvb2dsZXRhZ3NlcnZpY2VzLmNvbTo0NDMiLCJmZWF0dXJlIjoiUHJpdmFjeVNhbmRib3hBZHNBUElzIiwiZXhwaXJ5IjoxNjk1MTY3OTk5LCJpc1N1YmRvbWFpbiI6dHJ1ZSwiaXNUaGlyZFBhcnR5Ijp0cnVlfQ=="><meta http-equiv="origin-trial" content="As0hBNJ8h++fNYlkq8cTye2qDLyom8NddByiVytXGGD0YVE+2CEuTCpqXMDxdhOMILKoaiaYifwEvCRlJ/9GcQ8AAAB8eyJvcmlnaW4iOiJodHRwczovL2RvdWJsZWNsaWNrLm5ldDo0NDMiLCJmZWF0dXJlIjoiV2ViVmlld1hSZXF1ZXN0ZWRXaXRoRGVwcmVjYXRpb24iLCJleHBpcnkiOjE3MTk1MzI3OTksImlzU3ViZG9tYWluIjp0cnVlfQ=="><meta http-equiv="origin-trial" content="AgRYsXo24ypxC89CJanC+JgEmraCCBebKl8ZmG7Tj5oJNx0cmH0NtNRZs3NB5ubhpbX/bIt7l2zJOSyO64NGmwMAAACCeyJvcmlnaW4iOiJodHRwczovL2dvb2dsZXN5bmRpY2F0aW9uLmNvbTo0NDMiLCJmZWF0dXJlIjoiV2ViVmlld1hSZXF1ZXN0ZWRXaXRoRGVwcmVjYXRpb24iLCJleHBpcnkiOjE3MTk1MzI3OTksImlzU3ViZG9tYWluIjp0cnVlfQ=="></head>
<body class="" aria-hidden="false" style="padding: 0px 40px 160px;">
<div class="navbar no-items section" id="navbar">
</div>
<div class="body-fauxcolumns">
<div class="fauxcolumn-outer body-fauxcolumn-outer">
<div class="cap-top">
<div class="cap-left"></div>
<div class="cap-right"></div>
</div>
<div class="fauxborder-left">
<div class="fauxborder-right"></div>
<div class="fauxcolumn-inner">
</div>
</div>
<div class="cap-bottom">
<div class="cap-left"></div>
<div class="cap-right"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="content">
<div class="content-fauxcolumns">
<div class="fauxcolumn-outer content-fauxcolumn-outer">
<div class="cap-top">
<div class="cap-left"></div>
<div class="cap-right"></div>
</div>
<div class="fauxborder-left">
<div class="fauxborder-right"></div>
<div class="fauxcolumn-inner">
</div>
</div>
<div class="cap-bottom">
<div class="cap-left"></div>
<div class="cap-right"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="content-outer">
<div class="content-cap-top cap-top">
<div class="cap-left"></div>
<div class="cap-right"></div>
</div>
<div class="fauxborder-left content-fauxborder-left">
<div class="fauxborder-right content-fauxborder-right"></div>
<div class="content-inner">
<header>
<div class="header-outer">
<div class="header-cap-top cap-top">
<div class="cap-left"></div>
<div class="cap-right"></div>
</div>
<div class="fauxborder-left header-fauxborder-left">
<div class="fauxborder-right header-fauxborder-right"></div>
<div class="region-inner header-inner">
<div class="header section" id="header"><div class="widget Header" data-version="1" id="Header1">
<div id="header-inner" style="background-image: url("https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-OyFd36t2Doo/T7nMSchO46I/AAAAAAAAKjM/ynuhCCEf_bs/s800/background.jpg"); background-position: left; width: 550px; min-height: 105px; _height: 105px; background-repeat: no-repeat; ">
<div class="titlewrapper" style="background: transparent">
<h1 class="title" style="background: transparent; border-width: 0px">
<a href="http://www.righto.com/">
Ken Shirriff's blog
</a>
</h1>
</div>
<div class="descriptionwrapper">
<p class="description"><span>Computer history, restoring vintage computers, IC reverse engineering, and whatever</span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="header-cap-bottom cap-bottom">
<div class="cap-left"></div>
<div class="cap-right"></div>
</div>
</div>
</header>
<div class="tabs-outer">
<div class="tabs-cap-top cap-top">
<div class="cap-left"></div>
<div class="cap-right"></div>
</div>
<div class="fauxborder-left tabs-fauxborder-left">
<div class="fauxborder-right tabs-fauxborder-right"></div>
<div class="region-inner tabs-inner">
<div class="tabs no-items section" id="crosscol"></div>
<div class="tabs no-items section" id="crosscol-overflow"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="tabs-cap-bottom cap-bottom">
<div class="cap-left"></div>
<div class="cap-right"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="main-outer">
<div class="main-cap-top cap-top">
<div class="cap-left"></div>
<div class="cap-right"></div>
</div>
<div class="fauxborder-left main-fauxborder-left">
<div class="fauxborder-right main-fauxborder-right"></div>
<div class="region-inner main-inner">
<div class="columns fauxcolumns">
<div class="fauxcolumn-outer fauxcolumn-center-outer">
<div class="cap-top">
<div class="cap-left"></div>
<div class="cap-right"></div>
</div>
<div class="fauxborder-left">
<div class="fauxborder-right"></div>
<div class="fauxcolumn-inner">
</div>
</div>
<div class="cap-bottom">
<div class="cap-left"></div>
<div class="cap-right"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="fauxcolumn-outer fauxcolumn-left-outer">
<div class="cap-top">
<div class="cap-left"></div>
<div class="cap-right"></div>
</div>
<div class="fauxborder-left">
<div class="fauxborder-right"></div>
<div class="fauxcolumn-inner">
</div>
</div>
<div class="cap-bottom">
<div class="cap-left"></div>
<div class="cap-right"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="fauxcolumn-outer fauxcolumn-right-outer">
<div class="cap-top">
<div class="cap-left"></div>
<div class="cap-right"></div>
</div>
<div class="fauxborder-left">
<div class="fauxborder-right"></div>
<div class="fauxcolumn-inner">
</div>
</div>
<div class="cap-bottom">
<div class="cap-left"></div>
<div class="cap-right"></div>
</div>
</div>
<!-- corrects IE6 width calculation -->
<div class="columns-inner">
<div class="column-center-outer">
<div class="column-center-inner">
<div class="main section" id="main"><div class="widget Blog" data-version="1" id="Blog1">
<div class="blog-posts hfeed">
<div class="date-outer">
<div class="date-posts">
<div class="post-outer">
<div class="post hentry" itemprop="blogPost" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/BlogPosting">
<meta content="http://static.righto.com/images/apple2-psu.png" itemprop="image_url">
<meta content="6264947694886887540" itemprop="blogId">
<meta content="8980981208464913906" itemprop="postId">
<a name="8980981208464913906"></a>
<h3 class="post-title entry-title" itemprop="name">
Apple didn't revolutionize power supplies; new transistors did
</h3>
<div class="post-header">
<div class="post-header-line-1"></div>
</div>
<div class="post-body entry-content" id="post-body-8980981208464913906" itemprop="description articleBody">
<style type="text/css">
a.ref { color: gray;vertical-align: super; text-decoration: none; font-size:60%;margin-left: 2px;}
</style>
The new biography
<a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1451648537/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=rightocom&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=1451648537"><i>Steve Jobs</i></a> contains a remarkable claim about the power supply of the Apple II and its designer Rod Holt:<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref1">[1]</a>
<blockquote>
Instead of a conventional linear power supply, Holt built one like those used in oscilloscopes. It switched the power on and off not sixty times per second, but thousands of times; this allowed it to store the power for far less time, and thus throw off less heat. "That switching power supply was as revolutionary as the Apple II logic board was," Jobs later said. "Rod doesn't get a lot of credit for this in the history books but he should. Every computer now uses switching power supplies, and they all rip off Rod Holt's design."
</blockquote>
I found it amazing to think that computers now use power supplies based on the Apple II's design, so I did some investigation. It turns out that Apple's power supply was not revolutionary, either in the concept of using a switching power supply for computers or in the specific design of the power supply.
Modern computer power supplies are totally different and do not rip off anything from Rod Holt's design. It turns out that Steve Jobs was making his customary claim that everyone is stealing Apple's revolutionary technology, entirely contrary to the facts.
<p>
The history of switching power supplies turns out to be pretty interesting. While most people view the power supply as a boring metal box, there's actually a lot of technological development behind it. There was, in fact, a revolution in power supplies in the late 1960s through the mid 1970s as switching power supplies took over from simple but inefficient linear power supplies, but this was a few years before the Apple II came out in 1977. The credit for this revolution should go to advances in semiconductor technology, specifically improvements in switching transistors, and then innovative ICs to control switching power supplies.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref2">[2]</a>
</p><h3>Some background on power supplies</h3>
In a standard desktop computer, the power supply converts AC line voltage into DC, providing several carefully regulated low voltages at high currents. Power supplies can be built in a variety of ways, but linear and switching power supplies are the two techniques relevant to this discussion. (See the notes for more about obsolete technologies such as large
mechanical motor-generator systems<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref3">[3]</a> and ferroresonant transformers<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref4">[4]</a><a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref5">[5]</a>.)
<p>
A typical linear power supply uses a bulky power transformer to convert the 120V AC into a low AC voltage, converts this to low voltage DC with a diode bridge, and then uses a linear regulator to drop the voltage to the desired level. The linear regulator is an inexpensive easy-to-use transistor-based component that turns the excess voltage into waste heat to produce a stable output. Linear power supplies are almost trivial to design and build.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref6">[6]</a> One big disadvantage however, is they typically waste about 50-65% of the power as heat,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref7">[7]</a> often requiring large metal heat sinks or fans to get rid of the heat. The second disadvantage is they are large and heavy. On the plus side, the components (other than the transformer) in linear power supplies only need to handle low voltages and the output is very stable and noise-free.
</p><p>
A switching power supply works on a very different principle: rapidly turning the power on and off, rather than turning excess power into heat. In a switching power supply, the AC line input is converted to high-voltage DC, and then the power supply switches the DC on and off thousands of times a second, carefully controlling the time of the switching so the output voltage averages out to the desired value. Theoretically, no power gets wasted, although in practice the efficiency will be 80%-90%. Switching power supplies are much more efficient, give off much less heat, and are much smaller and lighter than linear power supplies.
The main disadvantage of a switching power supply is it is considerably more complex than a linear power supply and much harder to design.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref8">[8]</a> In addition, it is much more demanding on the components, requiring transistors that can efficiently switch on and off at high speed under high power. The switches, inductors, and capacitors in a switching power supply can be arranged in several different arrangements (or topologies), with names such as Buck, Boost, Flyback, Forward, Push-Pull, Half Wave, and Full-Wave.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref9">[9]</a>
</p><h3>History of switching power supplies to 1977</h3>
Switching power supply principles were known since the 1930s<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref6">[6]</a> and were being built out of discrete components in the 1950s.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref10">[10]</a> In 1958, the IBM 704 computer used a primitive vacuum-tube based switching regulator.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref11">[11]</a> The company Pioneer Magnetics started building switching power supplies in 1958<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref12">[12]</a> (and decades later made a key innovation in PC power supplies<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref13">[13]</a>). General Electric published an early switching power supply design in 1959.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref14">[14]</a> In the 1960s the aerospace industry and NASA<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref15">[15]</a> were the main driving force behind switching power supply development, since the advantages of small size and high efficiency made up for the high cost.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref16">[16]</a> For example, NASA used switching supplies for satellites<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref17">[17]</a><a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref18">[18]</a> such as Telstar in 1962.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref19">[19]</a>
<p>
The computer industry started using switching power supplies in the late 1960s and they steadily grew in popularity.
Examples include the PDP-11/20 minicomputer in 1969,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref20">[20]</a> the Honeywell H316R in 1970,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref21">[21]</a> and Hewlett-Packard's 2100A minicomputer in 1971.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref22">[22]</a><a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref23">[23]</a>
By 1971, companies using switching regulators "read like a 'Who's Who' of the computer industry: IBM, Honeywell, Univac, DEC, Burroughs, and RCA, to name a few."<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref21">[21]</a>
In 1974, HP used a switching power supply for the 21MX minicomputer,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref24">[24]</a> Data General for the Nova 2/4,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref25">[25]</a> Texas Instruments for the 960B,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref26">[26]</a> and Interdata for their minicomputers.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref27">[27]</a>
In 1975, HP used an off-line switching power supply in the HP2640A display terminal,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref28">[28]</a> Matsushita for their traffic control minicomputer,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref29">[29]</a> and IBM for its typewriter-like Selectric Composer<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref29">[29]</a> and for the IBM 5100 portable computer.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref30">[30]</a>
By 1976, Data General was using switching supplies for half their systems, Hitachi and Ferranti were using them,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref29">[29]</a> Hewlett-Packard's 9825A Desktop Computer<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref31">[31]</a> and 9815A Calculator<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref32">[32]</a> used them, and the decsystem 20<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref33">[33]</a> used a large switching power supply. By 1976, switching power supplies were showing up in living rooms, powering color television receivers.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref34">[34]</a><a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref35">[35]</a>
</p><p>
Switching power supplies also became popular products for power supply manufacturers starting in the late 1960s.
In 1967, RO Associates introduced the first 20Khz switching power supply product,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref36">[36]</a> which they claim was also the first switching power supply to be commercially successful.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref37">[37]</a> NEMIC started developing standardized switching power supplies in Japan in 1970.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref38">[38]</a>
By 1972, most power supply manufacturers were offering switching power supplies or were about to offer them.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref5">[5]</a><a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref39">[39]</a><a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref40">[40]</a><a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref41">[41]</a><a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref42">[42]</a>
HP sold a line of 300W switching power supplies in 1973,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref43">[43]</a> and a compact 500W switching power supply<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref44">[44]</a> and a 110W fanless switching power supply<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref45">[45]</a> in 1975. By 1975, switching power supplies were 8% of the power supply market and growing rapidly, driven by improved components and the desire for smaller power supplies for products such as microcomputers.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref46">[46]</a>
</p><p>
Switching power supplies were featured in electronics magazines of this era, both in advertisements and articles.
<i>Electronic Design</i> recommended switching power supplies in 1964 for better efficiency.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref47">[47]</a>
The October 1971 cover of <i>Electronics World</i> featured a 500W switching power supply and an article "The Switching Regulator Power Supply".
A long article about power supplies in <i>Computer Design</i> in 1972 discussed switching power supplies in detail and the increasing use of switching power supplies in computers, although it mentions some companies were still skeptical about switching power supplies.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref5">[5]</a>
In 1973, <i>Electronic Engineering</i> featured a detailed article "Switching power supplies: why and how".<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref42">[42]</a>
In 1976, the cover of Electronic Design<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref48">[48]</a> was titled "Suddenly it's easier to switch" describing the new switching power supply controller ICs,
<i>Electronics</i> ran a long article on switching power supplies,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref29">[29]</a>
Powertec ran two-page ads on the advantages of their switching power supplies with the catchphrase "The big switch is to switchers",<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref49">[49]</a> and <i>Byte</i> magazine announced Boschert's switching power supplies for microcomputers.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref50">[50]</a>
</p><p>
A key developer of switching power supplies was Robert Boschert, who quit his job and started building power supplies on his kitchen table in 1970.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref51">[51]</a> He focused on simplifying switching power supplies to make them cost-competitive with linear power supplies, and by 1974 he was producing low-cost power supplies in volume for printers,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref51">[51]</a><a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref52">[52]</a> which was followed by a low-cost 80W switching power supply in 1976.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref50">[50]</a> By 1977 Boschert Inc had grown to a 650-person company<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref51">[51]</a> that producing power supplies for satellites and the F-14 fighter aircraft,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref53">[53]</a> followed by power supplies for companies such as HP<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref54">[54]</a> and Sun.
People often think of the present as a unique time for technology startups, but Boschert illustrates that kitchen-table startups were happening even 40 years ago.
</p><p>
The advance of the switching power supply during the 1970s was largely driven by new components.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref55">[55]</a>
The voltage rating of switching transistors was often the limiting factor,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref5">[5]</a> so the introduction of high voltage, high speed, high power transistors at a low cost in the late 1960s and early 1970s greatly increased the popularity of switching power supplies.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref5">[5]</a><a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref6">[6]</a><a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref21">[21]</a><a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref16">[16]</a>
Transistor technology moved so fast that a 500W commercial power supply featured on the cover of <i>Electronics World</i> in 1971 couldn't have been built with the transistors of just 18 months earlier.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref21">[21]</a>
Once power transistors could handle hundreds of volts, power supplies could eliminate the heavy 60 Hz power transformer and run "off-line" directly from line voltage. Faster transistor switching speeds allowed more efficient and much smaller power supplies.
The introduction of integrated circuits to control switching power supplies in 1976 is widely viewed as ushering in the age of switching power supplies by drastically simplifying them.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref10">[10]</a><a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref56">[56]</a>
</p><p>
By the early 1970s, it was clear that a revolution was taking place. Power supply manufacturer Walt Hirschberg claimed in 1973 that "The revolution in power supply design now under way will not be complete until the 60-Hz transformer has been almost entirely replaced."<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref57">[57]</a> In 1977, an influential power supply book said that "switching regulators were viewed as in the process of revolutionizing the power supply industry".<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref58">[58]</a>
</p><h3>The Apple II and its power supply</h3>
The Apple II personal computer was introduced in 1977. One of its features was a compact, fanless switching power supply, which provided 38W of power at 5, 12, -5, and -12 volts. Holt's Apple II power supply uses a very simple design, with an off-line flyback converter topology.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref59">[59]</a>
<p>
Steve Jobs said that every computer now rips off Rod Holt's revolutionary design.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref1">[1]</a> But is this design revolutionary? Was it ripped off by every other computer?
</p><p>
As illustrated above, switching power supplies were in use by many computers by the time the Apple II was released. The design is not particularly revolutionary, as similar simple off-line flyback converters were being sold by Boschert<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref50">[50]</a><a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref60">[60]</a> and other companies. In the long term, building the control circuitry out of discrete components as Apple did was a dead-end technology, since the future of switching power supplies was in PWM controller ICs.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref2">[2]</a> It's surprising Apple continued using discrete oscillators in power supplies even through the Macintosh Classic, since IC controllers were introduced in 1975.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref48">[48]</a> Apple did switch to IC controllers, for instance in the Performa<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref61">[61]</a> and iMacs.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref62">[62]</a>
</p><p>
The power supply that Rod Holt designed for Apple was innovative enough to get a patent,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref63">[63]</a> so I examined the patent in detail to see if there were any less-obvious revolutionary features. The patent describes two mechanisms to protect the power supply against faults. The first (claim 1) is a mechanism to safely start the oscillator through an AC input. The second mechanism (claim 8) returns excess energy from the transformer to the power source (especially if there is no load) through a clamp winding on the transformer and a diode.
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kjfloop/459520293/" title="Apple II power supply by kjfloop, on Flickr"><img alt="Apple II power supply" height="237" src="./Apple didn't revolutionize power supplies; new transistors did_files/apple2-psu.png" width="640"></a>
</p><div class="cite">
This is the AA11040-B power supply for the Apple II Plus.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref59">[59]</a> AC power enters, on the left, is filtered, goes through the large switching transistor to the flyback transformer in the middle, is rectified by the diodes to the right (on heatsinks), and then is filtered by the capacitors on the right. The control circuitry is along the bottom. Photo used by permission from kjfloop, Copyright 2007.
</div>
<p>
The AC start mechanism was not used by the Apple II,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref59">[59]</a> but was used by the Apple II Plus,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref64">[64]</a> Apple III,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref65">[65]</a> Lisa,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref66">[66]</a> Macintosh,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref67">[67]</a> and Mac 128K through Classic.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref68">[68]</a> I could not find any non-Apple power supplies that use this mechanism,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref69">[69]</a> except for a 1978 TV power supply,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref70">[70]</a> and it became obsoleted by IC controllers, so this mechanism seems to have had no impact on computer power supply design.
</p><p>
The second mechanism in Holt's patent, the clamp winding and diode to return power in a flyback converter, was used in a variety of power supplies until the mid-1980s and then disappeared.
Some examples are the Boschert OL25 power supply (1978),<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref60">[60]</a>
Apple III (1980),<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref65">[65]</a>
Apple's power supply documentation (1982),<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref59">[59]</a>
Tandy hard drive (1982),<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref71">[71]</a>
Tandy 2000 (1983),<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref72">[72]</a><a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref73">[73]</a>
Apple Lisa (1983),<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref66">[66]</a>
Apple Macintosh (1984),<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref67">[67]</a>
Commodore Model B128 (1984),<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref74">[74]</a>
Tandy 6000 (1985),<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref75">[75]</a>
and
Mac Plus (1986) to Mac Classic (1990).<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref68">[68]</a>
This flyback clamp winding seems to have been popular with Motorola in the 1980s, appearing in the MC34060 controller IC datasheet,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref76">[76]</a> a 1983 designer's guide<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref77">[77]</a> (where the winding was described as common but optional), and a 1984 application note.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref78">[78]</a>
</p><p>
Is this flyback clamp winding the innovation of Holt's that other companies ripped off? I thought so, until I found a 1976 power supply book that described this winding in detail,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref35">[35]</a> which ruined my narrative. (Also note that forward converters (as opposed to flyback converters) had used this clamp winding dating back to 1956,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref79">[79]</a><a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref80">[80]</a><a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref81">[81]</a> so applying it to a flyback converter doesn't seem like a huge leap in any case.)
</p><p>
One puzzling aspect of power supply discussion in the book <i>Steve Jobs</i><a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref1">[1]</a> is the statement that the Apple II's power supply is "like those used in oscilloscopes", since oscilloscopes are just one small use for switching power supplies. This statement apparently arose because Holt had previously designed a switching power supply for oscilloscopes,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref82">[82]</a> but there's no other connection between Apple's power supply and oscilloscope power supplies.
</p><p>
The biggest impact of the Apple II on the power supply industry was on Astec - the Hong Kong company that manufactured the power supply. Before the Apple II came out, Astec was a little-known manufacturer, selling switching DC-DC inverters. But by 1982, Astec had become the world's top switching-powers-supply manufacturer, almost entirely based on Apple's business, and kept the top spot for a number of years.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref83">[83]</a><a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref84">[84]</a> In 1999, Astec was acquired by Emerson,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref85">[85]</a> which is currently the second-largest power supply company after Delta Electronics.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref86">[86]</a>
</p><p>
A little-known fact about the Apple II power supply is that it was originally assembled by middle-class California housewives as piecework.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref83">[83]</a> As demand grew, however, power supply construction was transferred to Astec, even though it cost $7 a unit more. Astec was building 30,000 Apple power supplies monthly by 1983.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref83">[83]</a>
</p><h3>Power supplies post-Apple</h3>
In 1981, the IBM PC was launched, which would have lasting impact on computer power supply designs. The power supply for the original IBM 5150 PC was produced by Astec and Zenith.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref83">[83]</a> This 63.5W power supply used a flyback design controlled by a NE5560 power supply controller IC.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref87">[87]</a>
<p>
I will compare the IBM 5150 PC power supply with the Apple II power supply in detail to show their commonalities and differences. They are both off-line flyback power supplies with multiple outputs, but that's about all they have in common. Even though the PC power supply uses an IC controller and the Apple II uses discrete components, the PC power supply uses approximately twice as many components as the Apple II power supply. While the Apple II power supply uses a variable frequency oscillator built out of transistors, the PC power supply uses a fixed-frequency PWM oscillator provided by the NE5560 controller IC. The PC uses optoisolators to provide voltage feedback to the controller, while the Apple II uses a small transformer. The Apple II drives the power transistor directly, while the PC uses a drive transformer. The PC checks all four power outputs against lower and upper voltage limits to make sure the power is good, and shuts down the controller if any voltages are out of spec. The Apple II instead uses a SCR crowbar across the 12V output if that voltage is too high. While the PC flyback transformer has a single primary winding, the Apple II uses an extra primary clamp winding to return power, as well as another primary winding for feedback. The PC provides linear regulation on the 12V and -5V supplies, while the Apple II doesn't. The PC uses a fan, while the Apple II famously doesn't. It's clear that the IBM 5150 power supply does not "rip off" the Apple II power supply design, as they have almost nothing in common. And later power supply designs became even more different.
</p><p>
The IBM PC AT power supply became a de facto standard for computer power supplies. In 1995, Intel introduced the ATX motherboard specification,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref88">[88]</a> and the ATX power supply (along with variants) has become the standard for desktop computer power supplies, with components and designs often targeted specifically at the ATX market.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref89">[89]</a>
</p><p>
Computer power systems became more complicated with the introduction of the voltage regulator module (VRM) in 1995 for the Pentium Pro, which required lower voltage at higher current than the power supply could provide directly. To supply this power, Intel introduced the VRM - a DC-DC switching regulator installed next to the processor that reduces the 12 volts from the power supply to the low voltage used by the processor.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref90">[90]</a> (If you overclock your computer, it is the VRM that lets you raise the voltage.) In addition, graphics cards can have their own VRM to power a high-performance graphics chip. A fast processor can require 130 watts from the VRM. Comparing this to the half watt of power used by the Apple II's 6502 processor<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref91">[91]</a> shows the huge growth in power consumption by modern processors. A modern processor chip alone can use more than twice the power of the whole IBM 5150 PC or three times that of the Apple II.
</p><p>
The amazing growth of the computer industry has caused the power consumption of computers to be a cause for environmental concern, resulting in initiatives and regulations to make power supplies more efficient.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref92">[92]</a> In the US, Energy Star and 80 PLUS certification<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref93">[93]</a> pushes manufacturers to manufacture more efficient "green" power supplies.
These power supplies squeeze out more efficiency through a variety of techniques: more efficient standby power, more efficient startup circuits, resonant circuits (also known as soft-switching and ZCT or ZVT) that reduce power losses in the switching transistors by ensuring that no power is flowing through them when they turn off, and "active clamp" circuits to replace switching diodes with more efficient transistor circuits.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref94">[94]</a> Improvements in MOSFET transistor and high-voltage silicon rectifier technology in the past decade has also led to efficiency improvements.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref92">[92]</a>
</p><p>
Power supplies can use the AC line power more efficiently through the technique of power factor correction (PFC).<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref95">[95]</a> Active power factor correction adds another switching circuit in front of the main power supply circuit. A special PFC controller IC switches this at a frequency of up to 250kHZ, carefully extracting a smooth amount of power from the power supply to produce high-voltage DC, which is then fed into a regular switching power supply circuit.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref13">[13]</a><a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref96">[96]</a> PFC also illustrates how power supplies have turned into a commodity with razor-thin margins, where a dollar is a lot of money. Active power factor correction is considered a feature of high-end power supplies, but its actual cost is only about $1.50.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref97">[97]</a>
</p><p>
Many different controller chips, designs, and topologies have been used for IBM PC power supplies over the years, both to support different power levels, and to take advantage of new technologies.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref98">[98]</a> Controller chips such as the NE5560 and SG3524 were popular in early IBM PCs.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref99">[99]</a> The TL494 chip became very popular in a half-bridge configuration,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref99">[99]</a> the most popular design in the 1990s.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref100">[100]</a> The UC3842 series was also popular for forward converter configurations.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref99">[99]</a>
The push for higher efficiency has made double forward converters more popular,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref101">[101]</a> and power factor correction (PFC) has made the CM6800 controller very popular,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref102">[102]</a> since the one chip controls both circuits. Recently, forward converters that generate only 12V have become more common, using DC-DC converters to produce very stable 3.3V and 5V outputs.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref94">[94]</a>
More detailed information on modern power supplies is available from many sources.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref103">[103]</a><a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref104">[104]</a><a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref98">[98]</a><a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref105">[105]</a>
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/20021159@N00/5326694298/" title="J&D 150W XT power supply by larrymoencurly, on Flickr"><img alt="XT power supply" height="270" src="./Apple didn't revolutionize power supplies; new transistors did_files/psu-xt.png" width="500"></a>
</p><div class="cite">
This typical 150W XT power supply uses the popular half-bridge design. The AC input filtering is on the right. To the left of this is the control/driver circuit: the TL494 IC at the top controls the small yellow drive transformer below, which drives the two switching transistors on the heatsinks below. To the left of this is the larger yellow main transformer, with the secondary diodes and regulator on the heatsinks, and output filtering to the left. This half-bridge power supply design is totally different from the Apple II's flyback design. Photo copyright larrymoencurly, used with permission.
</div>
<p>
Modern computers contain a surprising collection of switching power supplies and regulators. A modern power supply can contain a switching PFC circuit, a switching flyback power supply for standby power, a switching forward converter to generate 12 volts, a switching DC-DC converter to generate 5 volts, and a switching DC-DC converter to generate 3.3 volts,<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref94">[94]</a> so the ATX power supply can be considered five different switching power supplies in one box. In addition, the motherboard has a switching VRM regulator to power the processor, and the graphics card has another VRM, for a total of seven switching supplies in a typical desktop computer.
</p><p>
The technology of switching power supplies continues to advance. One development is digital control and digital power management.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref106">[106]</a> Instead of using analog control circuits, digital controller chips digitize the control inputs and use software algorithms to control the outputs. Thus, designing the power supply controller becomes as much a matter of programming as of hardware design. Digital power management lets power supplies communicate with the rest of the system for higher efficiency and logging. While these digital technologies are largely used for servers now, I expect they will trickle down to desktop computers eventually.
</p><p>
To summarize, the original IBM 5150 PC power supply was different in almost every way from the Apple II power supply, except both were flyback power supplies. More recent power supplies don't even have that in common with the Apple II. It's absurd to claim that power supplies are ripping off Apple's design.
</p><h3>Famous switching power supply designers</h3>
Steve Jobs said that Rod Holt should be better known for designing the Apple II's power supply: "Rod doesn't get a lot of credit for this in the history books but he should."<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref1">[1]</a>
But even at best, power supply designers aren't famous outside a very small community. Robert Boschert was inducted into Electronic Design's Electronic Engineering Hall of Fame in 2009 for his power supply work.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref51">[51]</a>
Robert Mammano got Power Electronics Technology's lifetime achievement award in 2005 for starting the PWM controller IC industry.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref10">[10]</a> Rudy Severns got Power Electronics Technology's lifetime achievement award in 2008 for his innovations in switching power supplies.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref107">[107]</a> But none of these people are even Wikipedia-famous. Other major innovators in the field get even less attention.<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref108">[108]</a> I repeatedly came across the work of Elliot Josephson, who designed satellite power systems in the early 1960s<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref18">[18]</a>, has a bunch of power supply patents including the Tandy 6000<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref75">[75]</a>, and even has his patent number printed on the Apple II Plus and Osborne 1 power supply circuit boards<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref59">[59]</a>, but he appears to be entirely unrecognized.
<p>
The irony in Steve Jobs' comment that Rod Holt doesn't get a lot of credit is that Rod Holt's work is described in <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=holt+apple+power+supply&btnG=Search+Books&tbm=bks&tbo=1#q=%22rod+holt%22+apple+%22power+supply%22&hl=en&safe=off&tbo=1&tbm=bks&ei=BGIMT__HC6q0iQLXtdz1Aw&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=d35bc974d7e9d685&biw=1074&bih=1004">dozens of books and articles</a> about Apple, from <i>Revenge of the Nerds</i> in 1982<a class="ref" href="http://www.righto.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html#ref109">[109]</a> to 2011's best-selling Steve Jobs biography, which makes Rod Holt easily the most famous power supply designer ever.
</p><h3>Conclusion</h3>
Power supplies aren't the boring metal boxes that most people think; they have a lot of interesting history, driven largely by the improvements in transistors that made switching power supplies practical for computers in the early 1970s. More recently, efficiency standards such as 80 PLUS have forced power supplies to become more efficient, resulting in new designs. The Apple II sold a huge number of switching power supplies, but its power supply design was a technological dead end that was not "ripped off" by other computers.
<p>
<b>If you're interested in power supplies, you might also like my article <a href="http://www.righto.com/2012/03/inside-cheap-phone-charger-and-why-you.html">Tiny, cheap, and dangerous: Inside a (fake) iPhone charger</a>.</b>
</p><h3>Notes and references</h3>
I spent way too much time researching power supplies, analyzing schematics and digging through old electronics journals. Here are my notes and references, in case they are of use to someone else. I'd be interested in hearing from power supply designers who have first-hand experience with the development of power supplies in the 1970s and 1980s.
<p>
<a name="ref1"></a>[1]
<a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1451648537/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=rightocom&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=1451648537"><i>Steve Jobs</i></a>, Walter Isaacson, 2011. Rod Holt's power supply design for the Apple II is discussed on page 74. Note that the description of a switching power supply in this book is rather garbled.
</p><p>
<a name="ref2"></a>[2]
<a href="http://powerelectronics.com/mag/510PET26.pdf">PWM: From a Single Chip To a Giant Industry</a>, Gene Heftman, Power Electronics Technology, pp48-53, Oct 2005.
</p><p>
<a name="ref3"></a>[3]
<a href="http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/www.bitsavers.org/pdf/cray/CRAY-1_PrelimSitePlanning.pdf">Preliminary Site Planning: Cray-1 Computer</a> (1975)
The Cray-1 used two 200 HP (150KW) motor-generator units to convert 250A 460V input AC into regulated 208V, 400Hz power; each motor-generator was approximately 3900 pounds. The 208V 400Hz power was fed into 36 separate power supplies that used twelve-phase transformers but no internal regulators. These power supplies famously formed the 12 benches around the Cray computer.
Photographs of the Cray power components are in <a href="http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/www.bitsavers.org/pdf/cray/HR-0808_CRAY-1S_HWref_Nov81.pdf">Cray-1 S Series Hardware Reference Manual</a> (1981).