@@ -23,20 +23,24 @@ into account when planning your deployment.
23
23
details] ( architectures/#architecture-details ) .
24
24
25
25
26
- ## Multiple databases on single instances
26
+ ## Multiple PGD instances per Postgres node
27
27
28
- Support for using PGD for multiple databases on the same Postgres instance is
29
- ** deprecated** beginning with PGD 5 and will no longer be supported with PGD 6. As
30
- we extend the capabilities of the product, the added complexity introduced
31
- operationally and functionally is no longer viable in a multi-database design.
28
+ Support for running multiple instances of PGD on the same Postgres node is
29
+ ** deprecated** beginning with PGD 5, as the operational complexity of this
30
+ approach is no longer viable.
32
31
33
- It's best practice and we recommend that you configure only one database per PGD instance.
32
+ Future versions of PGD will eventually disallow running multiple instances of
33
+ PGD. Instead, support for a single PGD installation hosting multiple databases
34
+ is being planned.
34
35
35
- The deployment automation with TPA and the tooling such as the CLI
36
- and PGD Proxy already codify that recommendation.
36
+ It's best practice and we recommend that you configure only one database per
37
+ PGD instance. The deployment automation with TPA and the tooling such as the
38
+ CLI and PGD Proxy already codify that recommendation. To separate tables into
39
+ modules, the use of schemas is recommended in combination with PGD 5.
37
40
38
- While it's still possible to host up to 10 databases in a single instance,
39
- doing so incurs many immediate risks and current limitations:
41
+ While it's still possible to host up to 10 PGD enabled databases in a single
42
+ Postgres instance, doing so incurs many immediate risks and current
43
+ limitations:
40
44
41
45
- If PGD configuration changes are needed, you must execute administrative commands
42
46
for each database. Doing so increases the risk for potential
0 commit comments