Skip to content

Suggest to load the extendscripter modules #6

Open
@GitBruno

Description

@GitBruno

Hey guys, I added the extendscripter modules to NPM which breaks this collection into bite-size pieces.

I suggest adding these as a dependency here? Making it nice and DRY.
And then once this is successful do the es5 as well.

What are your thoughts?

Of course, it would be good to write some test etc first before we do anything but would love to get your feedback!

Activity

ff6347

ff6347 commented on Mar 28, 2018

@ff6347
Member

Great work. I was wondering why you created another org on npm and here on Github too?

That gets confusing IMHO. Shouldn't we get all under one roof?

GitBruno

GitBruno commented on Mar 28, 2018

@GitBruno
Author

My thinking was that Extendscripters holds all the sub-modules (and possibly share the same global.myApp variable) that make up complete apps/projects in ExtendScript.

Clearly we would need to make this clear in the docs but can also rename if you like. What about myApp?

ff6347

ff6347 commented on Mar 29, 2018

@ff6347
Member

My thinking was that Extendscripters holds all the sub-modules (and possibly share the same global.myApp variable) that make up complete apps/projects in ExtendScript.
Clearly we would need to make this clear in the docs but can also rename if you like. What about myApp?

I don't get it? Do you want to create a boilerplate?

GitBruno

GitBruno commented on Mar 29, 2018

@GitBruno
Author

A mixture between a utility file (remember those) but then hosted seperared on NPM and an API/Framework (like IdExtenso) targeting other apps as well.

The separation of the utility file is an important detail as that is what makes the framework work load well using require.

Said that I will proberbly reference a boilerplate but this could be extentscriptr after we have the —nopoly flag. I hope this will start feeding different boilerplates.

Maybe I am over explaining it? And just a bunch of utility functions/classes is good enough?

Either way, it is a concept I am playing with. If it actually works I am not sure about (yet). But the seperate utility classes and functions would definitely be useful to developers even if the bigger picture fails.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

        Participants

        @ff6347@GitBruno

        Issue actions

          Suggest to load the extendscripter modules · Issue #6 · ExtendScript/extendscript-es6-shim