Skip to content

consider standard protocol specification like AsyncAPI #6

@crotwell

Description

@crotwell

Perhaps worth considering something like
https://www.asyncapi.com/docs
for standard way to specify the protocol.

I'm not sure if this is actually worth it, but probably should at least look into it as following a standard may be useful in generating api documentation, automated testing and interaction with tools, etc.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    laterkeep issue for possible future version of protocol

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions