Skip to content

Suggestions regarding subsource creepmeter #36

@javiquinte

Description

@javiquinte

On behalf of Frederik Tilmann

Subsource Creepmeter

That might be my lack of understanding as a non-specialist in creep
meters but If found the description confusing.

The orientation and therefore the dip and azimuth would be
perpendicular to the measuring beam

It seems the direction perpendicular to a line has some arbitrariness to it. Should this read
"parallel" instead (would make sense to me)

Dip/azimuths:

"Along the fault or wire"

I would not put the fault in this description as this depends on the setup, and the orientation of
natural feature should not matter. Why use wire here but beam in the in-text description?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    documentationImprovements or additions to documentation

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions