-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Local EVPN route leaking from unicast peer #17920
Comments
To enable route leak, you have to send: import/export vrf/vpn command. Have you tried, on you R1 vrf2? address-family ipv4 unicast |
Thank you for your suggestion Isang, what surprises me is that leak's behavior when receiving EVPN routes is not the same as when the routes are transformed into local EVPNs. In my configuration, R2 successfully imports EVPN routes from VRF1 into VRF2. The import is not performed locally only. Yes, you're right, VRF imports can be a way, but what I've noticed is that the routes are re-exported from the VRF on which we've imported them. When i activate
Without import vrf
|
Could you enable |
Without import vrf:
It is normal that we have a label ? For information, there are no bgp evpn l2vpn vrf route leaking related topotests. |
Of course, I'll give you the return on R1/R2 by flapping the unicast session between LB1 and R1.
If you wish in the future I can make a topotest that can look like the lab I attached on the first message. |
Is this related |
hello ton31337, I don't know if the question is for me, at least I didn't understand it. In my research, I understood that this configuration was enough to export VRF routes into EVPN:
And in this case, the EVPN export/import seems to work well for neighbors that receive the EVPN routes. I attempted the following configuration: On VRF1:
And on VRF2:
Without success. |
Description
Hi, I'm not sure about the title of the issue.
I also don't know if the behavior is expected.
I'm in a case where routers with FRR do EVPN vxlan, I have several VRFs, and we do RT import on some VRFs to make them communicate.
This concept works very well, but it gets complicated in the case where we have a bgp ip-unicast session between one of its routers in a VRF to another router.
The route is re-announced in EVPN (route type 5) and the leak works well on the routers receiving this announcement. However, local leaking does not work.
Version
How to reproduce
I made a lab containerlab if that helps.
https://github.com/alcelafranque/network-lab/tree/main/frr-evpn-vxlan-vrf-leak-ip-unicast
If that's not enough, here are the settings for R1:
For LB1
And for R2
Expected behavior
I would have liked the leak to work locally too
Actual behavior
Additional context
No response
Checklist
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: