Interactive checklist format update?

[ddsjoberg]

First, I love this work. I am using it now and thinking of ways to use it more. Thank you!

I find myself watching the interactive updates (they are so cute) during the rev dep checks. Last time I was watching the progress, I had a thought about a potential improvement to the format the information is displayed. Many reverse dependencies are packages totally out of our control and I am not really concerned whether or not there is an error/warning/note in the checks on any single version. Rather, I want to see whether there are new error/warning/notes using the dev version for the check. Perhaps a counter that had one row per rev dep and reported on new error/warning/notes would be more informative?

[dgkf-roche]

This would be amazing, and I think it should be pretty manageable. Maybe we could do something like this:

                              │ S │ OK  N  W  E │
─ gtsummary ──────────────────┼───┼─────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────
              +cards (v0.2.2) │ ✓ │ 47  0  0  0 │ 2.5s
     +cards (dev v0.2.2.9000) │ W │ -2 +1 +1  0 │ 2.5s
─ cardx ──────────────────────┼───┼─────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────
              +cards (v0.2.2) │ ✓ │ 40  0  0  0 │ 2.5s
     +cards (dev v0.2.2.9000) │ ◓ │ 22  0  1  0 │ 3.6s checking if there is a namespace ...

When in progress, the task is reporting the total of each category, and once it finishes it reports the diff. I like this style because it groups the information, but it's still a bit hard to scan visually to see which packages are problematic. We could maybe find a way to highlight each group with an indicator after both the release and dev jobs have finished.

[ddsjoberg]

ooooo, this looks beautiful! I love the plus/minus notation