You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi. I have a question about the reported metrics of Poseur in your paper.
In the original Poseur paper, AP is 75.4 with ResNet-50 backbone. However, it is 74.2 in your paper with the same backbone. May I ask the reason of this difference?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the original Poseur paper, an AP of 75.4 was achieved through the use of the flip test as a test-time augmentation technique. However, in the case of ED-Pose, no test-time augmentation is employed. We conduct a fair comparison between the two methods, where we utilize the Poseur checkpoints while excluding the flip test and yield an AP of 74.2.
In the original Poseur paper, an AP of 75.4 was achieved through the use of the flip test as a test-time augmentation technique. However, in the case of ED-Pose, no test-time augmentation is employed. We conduct a fair comparison between the two methods, where we utilize the Poseur checkpoints while excluding the flip test and yield an AP of 74.2.
Hi. I have a question about the reported metrics of Poseur in your paper.
In the original Poseur paper, AP is 75.4 with ResNet-50 backbone. However, it is 74.2 in your paper with the same backbone. May I ask the reason of this difference?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: