You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Overview of the Suggestion
I would like to propose an alternative schema.org RDF file, without all the blank nodes currently in JSON-LD.
What kind of user is the suggestion intended for?
API User, Curator
What inspired this idea?
the need to combine metadata from Dataverse with metadata from library, collections and archival systems;
the wish to use SHACL to check for basic evaluation of data, across afore mentioned systems;
What existing behavior do you want changed?
the current JSON-LD RDF schema creates many blank nodes (a downside of converting JSON to RDF). This conflates the number of triples and therewith hampers communication across the web. Moreover, it hinders linking of datasets to persons as for each value of a person's name, a new blank node is created and there is no way of knowing which blank node belongs to what person;
Any brand new behavior do you want to add to Dataverse?
no, I think all the technical features are in place. Also, many of the vocabulary decisions to map Dataverse to schema.org have already been made via the current JSON-LD implementation. I do think the end result would need to be served via an additional API
Any open or closed issues related to this suggestion?
Are you thinking about creating a pull request for this issue?
I could help implement it with help. I know of the Linked Data/Schema part, but would need help with the API. With some mentoring I could come a long way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I assume you're talking about the "Schema.org JSON-LD" one, specifically. Is that right? Can you please show an example of blank nodes?
These days exporters no longer need to be shipped with Dataverse itself. In fact, both Croissant and RO-Crate are "external" exporters with their own code bases.
Also, it's possible to override an internal exporter with an external implementation. So if you don't like how the "Schema.org JSON-LD" exporter works (which is internal), you could create an external exporter that overrides it. Under dataverse.spi.exporters.directory we explain "Dataverse will examine all JARs in the specified directory and will use them to add new metadata export formats or (if the machine-readable name used in Export Metadata of a Dataset in Various Formats is the same) replace built-in metatadata export formats." See also the section in the dev guide about building your own exporter.
Overview of the Suggestion
I would like to propose an alternative schema.org RDF file, without all the blank nodes currently in JSON-LD.
What kind of user is the suggestion intended for?
API User, Curator
What inspired this idea?
What existing behavior do you want changed?
Any brand new behavior do you want to add to Dataverse?
Any open or closed issues related to this suggestion?
Are you thinking about creating a pull request for this issue?
I could help implement it with help. I know of the Linked Data/Schema part, but would need help with the API. With some mentoring I could come a long way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: