[Architecture] Anti-gaming safeguards for reputation system

[Ikalus1988]

Task

Design safeguards against reputation manipulation.

Acceptance Criteria

• Sigmoid cap: max reputation gain per day/week
• Sybil detection: flag accounts with suspicious patterns
• Peer review requirement: high-rep changes need2+ reviews
• Audit log: all reputation changes logged
• Appeal process: contributors can contest unfair penalties

Why it matters

Without safeguards, reputation systems get gamed. Prevention is cheaper than detection.

Difficulty

🔴 Ring-4 — security + game theory.

---

This repo is using Opire - what does it mean? 👇

💵 Everyone can add rewards for this issue commenting /reward 100 (replace 100 with the amount).
🕵️‍♂️ If someone starts working on this issue to earn the rewards, they can comment /try to let everyone know!
🙌 And when they open the PR, they can comment /claim #328 either in the PR description or in a PR's comment.

🪙 Also, everyone can tip any user commenting /tip 20 @Ikalus1988 (replace 20 with the amount, and @Ikalus1988 with the user to tip).

📖 If you want to learn more, check out our documentation.