Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Tests and Benchmarking #1

Open
pedromxavier opened this issue Jun 24, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Tests and Benchmarking #1

pedromxavier opened this issue Jun 24, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@pedromxavier
Copy link
Member

pedromxavier commented Jun 24, 2022 •
edited
Loading

I was wondering about implementing both Anneal.benchmark(::Type{<:AnnealAbstractSampler}) and Anneal.test(::Type{<:Anneal.AbstractSampler}) for direct use when building new interfaces and stuff.
@bernalde
Copy link

We should talk about this with more detail. Carleton and I are working on this and might be useful to set common goals.

@pedromxavier pedromxavier mentioned this issue Aug 20, 2022
Merged
@pedromxavier pedromxavier transferred this issue from psrenergy/Anneal.jl Apr 4, 2023
@bernalde
Copy link

bernalde commented Apr 5, 2023

From the PySA results that we shared, the .test capabilities are already working. This might still be relevant for the .benchmark case

@pedromxavier
Copy link
Member Author

Yes! QUBOTools implements some metrics for solutions, but we still need to build a few more low-level analytical tools (including the ones you were developing when WQCOR took place) before providing the .benchmark solution.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@bernalde @pedromxavier