You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/src/benchmarks.md
+4-24Lines changed: 4 additions & 24 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Run `perf/runbenchmarks.jl` to see benchmark results for the Atlas robot (v5). R
15
15
> **Note**
16
16
> Results on CI builds are **not at all** representative because of code coverage.
17
17
18
-
Here are the results on an Apple MacBook Air (M1, 2020) (8GB RAM, 512GB SSD) at commit [b9ef1d](https://github.com/JuliaRobotics/RigidBodyDynamics.jl/commit/b9ef1d6974beff4d4fbe7dffc6dbfa65f71e0132):
18
+
Below are the results for **RBD.jl 2.3.2** (commit [`b9ef1d`](https://github.com/JuliaRobotics/RigidBodyDynamics.jl/commit/b9ef1d6974beff4d4fbe7dffc6dbfa65f71e0132)) using **Julia 1.8.5** on an **Apple MacBook Air (M1, 2020)** (8GB RAM, 512GB SSD):
19
19
20
20
Output of `versioninfo()`:
21
21
```
@@ -39,54 +39,34 @@ BenchmarkTools.Trial: 10000 samples with 10 evaluations.
Note the low additional cost of computing a Jacobian when the mass matrix is already computed. This is because RigidBodyDynamics.jl caches intermediate computation results.
65
55
66
56
Inverse dynamics ([`inverse_dynamics!`](@ref)):
67
-
```julia
57
+
```
68
58
BenchmarkTools.Trial: 10000 samples with 10 evaluations.
0 commit comments