You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've observed that when applying the same model to a given dataset, the symbolic fitting formulas produced can vary. While I understand that this variability arises from factors such as the selection of data points and inherent randomness during the optimization process, I would like to delve deeper into the fundamental reasons behind this phenomenon.
Is there a method to reliably identify a deterministic formula that effectively describes a relatively simple dataset? Furthermore, is it feasible to discover such a formula using any random seed while maintaining the same network structure?
I encourage everyone to join this discussion and share your insights!
Here are the results of symbolic formulas obtained using the same dataset, the same network structure, but different random seeds.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've observed that when applying the same model to a given dataset, the symbolic fitting formulas produced can vary. While I understand that this variability arises from factors such as the selection of data points and inherent randomness during the optimization process, I would like to delve deeper into the fundamental reasons behind this phenomenon.
Is there a method to reliably identify a deterministic formula that effectively describes a relatively simple dataset? Furthermore, is it feasible to discover such a formula using any random seed while maintaining the same network structure?
I encourage everyone to join this discussion and share your insights!
Here are the results of symbolic formulas obtained using the same dataset, the same network structure, but different random seeds.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: