Replies: 1 comment
-
Hey @hanzzzzz - We generally match the Edge/Chromium process model: Browser processes are associated with a user data folder, so if you want separate processes (for example, a "firewall allowed" group and a "non-firewall allowed" group) you could create 2 user data folders, 1 for each group. How are you planning on allowing the firewall access? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Currently, my test application using the WebView2 runtime spawns one child
msedgewebview2.exe
, which again spawns five moremsedgewebview2.exe
child processes. Those are shared with new instances of my test application.In my use case, I need to have one (or more, if required) isolated
msedgewebview2.exe
process which is not shared with other processes using the WebView2 runtime. This is required for restricting network traffic to this single process using a firewall, as currently some of the child processes would handle the network traffic, so if I allow it through the firewall, all other processes using the WebView2 runtime would also be able to get through the firewall.Is it possible to get a dedicated
msedgewebview2.exe
process, which is only used by exactly one instance of my application?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions