Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test scale variations expanded against exponentiated #201

Closed
andreab1997 opened this issue Jan 20, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #346
Closed

Test scale variations expanded against exponentiated #201

andreab1997 opened this issue Jan 20, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #346
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Milestone

Comments

@andreab1997
Copy link
Contributor

At the moment the test scheme_diff in `/scale_variations/test_expanded.py is not really checking the difference between scheme A and B (i.e exponentiated vs expanded). However we know how to do the proper test because we have all the terms in a mathematica notebbok in pineko (here). While the actual expressions for scale variations have been checked against this notebook, the test has not been updated consistently yet (for lack of time). We should
do the proper thing as soon as possible. @alecandido @felixhekhorn @giacomomagni

@andreab1997 andreab1997 added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 20, 2023
@alecandido alecandido added this to the post milestone Jan 27, 2023
@felixhekhorn
Copy link
Contributor

Note that in #222 the SV behaviour was re-derived and changed (and, e.g., in effect for exponentiated $\xi_F$ flipped on it's head)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants