At commit 151a8d1c922ffadad08399508efe46b207a5894e:
// scripts/typed-edge-classifier/classify-edges.mjs:69-80
const PRICING = {
...
"claude-opus-4-7": { in: 15.0, out: 75.0 },
"claude-opus-4-6": { in: 15.0, out: 75.0 },
...
"anthropic/claude-opus-4-7": { in: 15.0, out: 75.0 },
...
};Per Anthropic's pricing page (https://www.anthropic.com/pricing as of 2026-05-17): Opus 4.7 is $5/MTok input, $25/MTok output (1M-context tier; standard tier is similar order-of-magnitude). The PRICING map has the older Opus 3 rates (~3x too high).
Why it matters
--max-cost-usd is enforced by accumulating estimated dollars from this map. Because the map overestimates Opus 4.7 cost by ~3x, the cap fires at ~33% of the intended budget — the classifier aborts mid-batch on what should be a finishable run.
This is a correctness bug, not a cost-savings issue: users who set a $1 cap are actually running a $0.33 cap.
Suggested patch
"claude-opus-4-7": { in: 5.0, out: 25.0 },
"anthropic/claude-opus-4-7": { in: 5.0, out: 25.0 },(And probably double-check the Haiku 4.5 / Sonnet 4.6 entries against current pricing while you're in there.)
Context
Same self-hosted Davies Farms setup as #313 / #314 / #315 / #316. Caught during an OB1-model-cost audit at our 366-thought scale. Audit grounded all numbers in current provider pricing pages; the PRICING map looks like it was filled in once and not refreshed when Opus 4.7 priced lower than Opus 3.
Happy to PR alongside the others.
At commit
151a8d1c922ffadad08399508efe46b207a5894e:Per Anthropic's pricing page (https://www.anthropic.com/pricing as of 2026-05-17): Opus 4.7 is $5/MTok input, $25/MTok output (1M-context tier; standard tier is similar order-of-magnitude). The PRICING map has the older Opus 3 rates (~3x too high).
Why it matters
--max-cost-usdis enforced by accumulating estimated dollars from this map. Because the map overestimates Opus 4.7 cost by ~3x, the cap fires at ~33% of the intended budget — the classifier aborts mid-batch on what should be a finishable run.This is a correctness bug, not a cost-savings issue: users who set a $1 cap are actually running a $0.33 cap.
Suggested patch
(And probably double-check the Haiku 4.5 / Sonnet 4.6 entries against current pricing while you're in there.)
Context
Same self-hosted Davies Farms setup as #313 / #314 / #315 / #316. Caught during an OB1-model-cost audit at our 366-thought scale. Audit grounded all numbers in current provider pricing pages; the PRICING map looks like it was filled in once and not refreshed when Opus 4.7 priced lower than Opus 3.
Happy to PR alongside the others.