Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please change localize_delta_mass to 0. #1789

Closed
johnpleid opened this issue Sep 20, 2024 · 15 comments
Closed

Please change localize_delta_mass to 0. #1789

johnpleid opened this issue Sep 20, 2024 · 15 comments
Assignees

Comments

@johnpleid
Copy link

Hi to everybody
I get this error
Checking database...
It is a closed search while localize_delta_mass = 1. Please change localize_delta_mass to 0.

But i can't findin which tab is: localize_delta_mass to 0.

someone can help me?
thanx
Giovanni

@anesvi
Copy link
Collaborator

anesvi commented Sep 20, 2024

It is in MSFragger tab. But you should not see this message unless you you start changing default parameters and do something wrong. Please use one of the default workflows before changing things.

@fcyu fcyu self-assigned this Sep 20, 2024
@fcyu
Copy link
Member

fcyu commented Sep 20, 2024

It's called "localize mass shift (LOS)" in the MSFragger tab. But, yeah, don't change the parameters that you are not sure what they are.

Best,

Fengchao

@fcyu fcyu closed this as completed Sep 23, 2024
@johnpleid
Copy link
Author

thank you it worked. I get the results, but now I tried to add quantification activating "run ms1 quant" and separating all the runs and separating the runs replicates while before were merged, and now the analysis stop at level of "'PhilosopherFilter"
I add the log file of the run if someone can help. Thanx
log_2024-09-27_09-57-17.txt

@fcyu
Copy link
Member

fcyu commented Sep 27, 2024

There are 0 IDs with probability > 0.05. Please double check your sample or settings.

Best,

Fengchao

@johnpleid
Copy link
Author

strange because without quantification on it worked

@fcyu
Copy link
Member

fcyu commented Sep 27, 2024

Can you share the log file?

Thanks,

Fengchao

@johnpleid
Copy link
Author

it is in my previous post

@fcyu
Copy link
Member

fcyu commented Sep 29, 2024

Your precious post said that that it didn't work

I get the results, but now I tried to add quantification activating "run ms1 quant" and separating all the runs and separating the runs replicates while before were merged, and now the analysis stop at level of "'PhilosopherFilter"
I add the log file of the run if someone can help. Thanx
log_2024-09-27_09-57-17.txt

But now you said

strange because without quantification on it worked

Thus, I asked for the log file corresponding to the "worked" one just to make sure that it really worked or you made any other mistakes.

Best,

Fengchao

@johnpleid
Copy link
Author

log_2024-09-23_10-18-58.txt
Ah i haven't understood you want the good one...here is the log when worked

@fcyu
Copy link
Member

fcyu commented Sep 29, 2024

Thanks for sharing the log file. The difference is that in the failed one, you assigned each mzML file to a separated experiment group, but in the success one, you just assigned three groups and each group has multiple mzML files.

LCMS files:
  Experiment/Group: BSC_1
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190411_QE7_nLC3_MEM_COLLAB_BSC180.mzML	DDA
  Experiment/Group: BSC_2
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190411_QE7_nLC3_MEM_COLLAB_BSC182.mzML	DDA
  Experiment/Group: BSC_3
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190411_QE7_nLC3_MEM_COLLAB_BSC183.mzML	DDA
  Experiment/Group: ECC_1
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190411_QE7_nLC3_MEM_COLLAB_ECC106.mzML	DDA
  Experiment/Group: ECC_2
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190411_QE7_nLC3_MEM_COLLAB_ECC108.mzML	DDA
  Experiment/Group: ECC_3
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190411_QE7_nLC3_MEM_COLLAB_ECC109.mzML	DDA
  Experiment/Group: ECC_4
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190411_QE7_nLC3_MEM_COLLAB_ECC117.mzML	DDA
  Experiment/Group: ECC_5
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190411_QE7_nLC3_MEM_COLLAB_ECC118.mzML	DDA
  Experiment/Group: PC_1
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190411_QE7_nLC3_MEM_COLLAB_PC203.mzML	DDA
  Experiment/Group: PC_2
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190411_QE7_nLC3_MEM_COLLAB_PC205.mzML	DDA
  Experiment/Group: PC_3
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190411_QE7_nLC3_MEM_COLLAB_PC206.mzML	DDA
  Experiment/Group: PC_4
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190411_QE7_nLC3_MEM_COLLAB_PC207.mzML	DDA
  Experiment/Group: PC_5
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190514_QE7_nLC7_MEM_COLLAB_PC193.mzML	DDA
  Experiment/Group: PC_6
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190514_QE7_nLC7_MEM_COLLAB_PC195.mzML	DDA
LCMS files:
  Experiment/Group: BSC
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190411_QE7_nLC3_MEM_COLLAB_BSC180.mzML	DDA
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190411_QE7_nLC3_MEM_COLLAB_BSC182.mzML	DDA
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190411_QE7_nLC3_MEM_COLLAB_BSC183.mzML	DDA
  Experiment/Group: ECC
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190411_QE7_nLC3_MEM_COLLAB_ECC106.mzML	DDA
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190411_QE7_nLC3_MEM_COLLAB_ECC108.mzML	DDA
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190411_QE7_nLC3_MEM_COLLAB_ECC109.mzML	DDA
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190411_QE7_nLC3_MEM_COLLAB_ECC117.mzML	DDA
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190411_QE7_nLC3_MEM_COLLAB_ECC118.mzML	DDA
  Experiment/Group: PC
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190411_QE7_nLC3_MEM_COLLAB_PC203.mzML	DDA
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190411_QE7_nLC3_MEM_COLLAB_PC205.mzML	DDA
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190411_QE7_nLC3_MEM_COLLAB_PC206.mzML	DDA
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190411_QE7_nLC3_MEM_COLLAB_PC207.mzML	DDA
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190514_QE7_nLC7_MEM_COLLAB_PC193.mzML	DDA
  - D:\Data\gio\leila\20190514_QE7_nLC7_MEM_COLLAB_PC195.mzML	DDA

The first file 20190411_QE7_nLC3_MEM_COLLAB_BSC180.mzML happened to have no IDs. When you assigned it to its own experiment group, the Philosopher filter command crashed. When you assigned it and other files in one group, the Philosopher filter command didn't crash because other files have non-zero IDs.

Best,

Fengchao

@johnpleid
Copy link
Author

thank you i try to relunch the analysis without the empty run...however it is unconfortable that for a no good LC MS run it stop en entire procedure

@fcyu
Copy link
Member

fcyu commented Sep 30, 2024

Can you share the log file?

@johnpleid
Copy link
Author

It crashed also removing the no Ids file
log_2024-09-30_06-10-07.txt

@fcyu
Copy link
Member

fcyu commented Sep 30, 2024

There are more than one file with no IDs. If you want to maintain the experiment group assignment that each file in a separated group, you should remove all of them.

Or, you could change the experiment groups to the one used in one of your log log_2024-09-23_10-18-58.txt

Best,

Fengchao

@johnpleid
Copy link
Author

ok thank you

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants