feature/fix sonarcloud quality gate compliance. #1169
Conversation
Summary by CodeRabbit
These improvements enhance overall system maintainability and reliability, ultimately contributing to a smoother user experience. WalkthroughThis commit introduces three separate updates. A new ignore entry ( Changes
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
…/Nest into feature/fix-sonarcloud-issues
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 17
🧹 Nitpick comments (171)
backend/tests/app/github/models/mixins/issue_test.py (1)
14-14: Remove unnecessary parentheses in pytest fixture decorator.Pytest recommends using
@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses when no arguments are needed.-@pytest.fixture() +@pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
14-14: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/events/url_verification_test.py (3)
9-14: Use@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses.The static analysis tool correctly identified this issue. When no arguments are needed, the preferred style is to use
@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses.-@pytest.fixture() +@pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
9-9: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
16-19: Add cleanup to restore original SlackConfig.app value.This fixture modifies a global state (
SlackConfig.app) but doesn't restore it afterward, which could potentially affect other tests.-@pytest.fixture() +@pytest.fixture def slack_bot(mock_slack_app): + original_app = SlackConfig.app SlackConfig.app = mock_slack_app - return SlackConfig + yield SlackConfig + SlackConfig.app = original_app🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
16-16: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
22-28: Consider adding test cases for edge scenarios.The current test only validates the "happy path" where the challenge key exists in the event dictionary. Consider adding tests for edge cases:
- When the challenge is missing
- When the event is None
- When the event has other unexpected structures
This would improve the robustness of your test suite.
backend/tests/app/owasp/api/project_test.py (1)
6-35: Well-structured parameterized test, good job!The test is well-designed with pytest parameterization to test both valid and invalid data cases for the ProjectSerializer. This approach effectively reduces code duplication, aligning with the PR objectives.
One small suggestion - consider adding a docstring to the test function to explain what specific validation is being tested and why "Hello" is an invalid value for the "level" field. This would improve maintainability for other developers.
@pytest.mark.parametrize( ("data", "expected"), [ ( { "name": "another project", "description": "A test project by owasp", "level": "other", "created_at": "2023-01-01T00:00:00Z", "updated_at": "2023-01-02T00:00:00Z", }, True, ), ( { "name": "this is a project", "description": "this is not a project, this is just a file", "level": "Hello", "created_at": "2023-01-01T00:00:00Z", "updated_at": "2023-01-02T00:00:00Z", }, False, ), ], ) def test_project_serializer_validation(data, expected): + """ + Test ProjectSerializer validation logic. + + Validates that: + - A project with valid data passes validation + - A project with invalid 'level' field fails validation (valid levels don't include 'Hello') + """ serializer = ProjectSerializer(data=data) is_valid = serializer.is_valid() assert is_valid == expectedbackend/tests/app/owasp/models/mixins/common_test.py (3)
13-23: Well-structured parametrized test.The test effectively uses pytest's parametrize decorator to test both positive and negative scenarios for the
is_indexableproperty. The test cases are clear and cover the essential functionality.One minor suggestion: Consider adding a docstring to the test method to explain what functionality is being verified for improved readability and documentation.
def test_is_indexable(self, has_active_repositories, expected_indexable): + """ + Verify that is_indexable property correctly reflects the has_active_repositories state. + """ instance = EntityModelMixin(has_active_repositories=has_active_repositories) assert instance.is_indexable == expected_indexable
6-6: Minor style suggestion.There's an extra blank line here that could be removed to maintain consistent spacing throughout the file.
1-24: Consider adding more test cases for comprehensive coverage.The current test only verifies the
is_indexableproperty. If theRepositoryBasedEntityModelMixinhas additional functionality, consider extending the test suite to cover those aspects as well.backend/tests/app/owasp/scraper_test.py (1)
13-13: Simplify pytest fixture decoratorsThe static analysis tool Ruff recommends using
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()for cleaner code.- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixtureThis applies to all three fixture decorators in this file (lines 13, 21, and 38).
Also applies to: 21-21, 38-38
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
13-13: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/github/management/commands/github_update_owasp_organization_test.py (2)
35-35: Consider using@pytest.fixtureinstead of@pytest.fixture()Remove the empty parentheses to follow pytest's best practices. The static analyzer flags this as PT001, and removing the parentheses improves readability.
-@pytest.fixture() +@pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
35-35: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
40-40: Consider using@pytest.fixtureinstead of@pytest.fixture()Similar to the above, remove the empty parentheses to follow pytest's best practices and address the PT001 static analyzer warning.
-@pytest.fixture() +@pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
40-40: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/owasp/api/urls_test.py (4)
9-9: Minor: Remove extra blank lineThere's an extra blank line here that isn't necessary for code readability.
-
19-32: Consider adding a docstring to explain test purposeAdding a docstring to the test function would improve documentation and make the test's purpose clearer to other developers.
@pytest.mark.parametrize( ("url_name", "expected_prefix", "viewset_class"), [ ("chapter-list", "owasp/chapters", ChapterViewSet), ("committee-list", "owasp/committees", CommitteeViewSet), ("event-list", "owasp/events", EventViewSet), ("project-list", "owasp/projects", ProjectViewSet), ], ) +""" +Test that ensures proper registration of viewsets with the router. + +This test validates that each viewset is correctly registered with the +expected URL prefix pattern and that the route is associated with the +correct viewset class. +""" def test_router_registration(url_name, expected_prefix, viewset_class):
32-32: Add newline at end of fileAdd a newline at the end of the file to follow standard code style practices.
), f"Viewset for '{route.name}' does not match {viewset_class}." -32 +32 +
20-21: Consider enhancing error messages with available routesThe current error message tells you which route wasn't found, but it would be more helpful if it also showed what routes are actually available in the router.
- matching_routes = [route for route in router.urls if route.name == url_name] - assert matching_routes, f"Route '{url_name}' not found in router." + matching_routes = [route for route in router.urls if route.name == url_name] + available_routes = [route.name for route in router.urls] + assert matching_routes, f"Route '{url_name}' not found in router. Available routes: {available_routes}"backend/tests/app/github/api/urls_test.py (2)
24-26: Consider adding a docstring to the test methodWhile the test method is well-implemented, adding a docstring would improve readability and clarify the purpose of the test for other developers.
def test_router_registration(self, url_name, expected_prefix, viewset_class): + """ + Verify that each router URL is correctly registered with the expected prefix and viewset class. + + Args: + url_name: The name of the URL route to check + expected_prefix: The URL prefix that should be present in the route + viewset_class: The viewset class that should be associated with the route + """ matching_routes = [route for route in router.urls if route.name == url_name] assert matching_routes, f"Route '{url_name}' not found in router."
1-37: Consider adding an edge case test for non-existent routesThe current tests verify that expected routes exist, but it might be valuable to also test how the system behaves with invalid route names.
import pytest from apps.github.api.issue import IssueViewSet from apps.github.api.label import LabelViewSet from apps.github.api.organization import OrganizationViewSet from apps.github.api.release import ReleaseViewSet from apps.github.api.repository import RepositoryViewSet from apps.github.api.urls import router from apps.github.api.user import UserViewSet class TestRouterRegistration: @pytest.mark.parametrize( ("url_name", "viewset_class", "expected_prefix"), [ ("issue-list", IssueViewSet, "github/issues"), ("label-list", LabelViewSet, "github/labels"), ("organization-list", OrganizationViewSet, "github/organizations"), ("release-list", ReleaseViewSet, "github/releases"), ("repository-list", RepositoryViewSet, "github/repositories"), ("user-list", UserViewSet, "github/users"), ], ) def test_router_registration(self, url_name, expected_prefix, viewset_class): matching_routes = [route for route in router.urls if route.name == url_name] assert matching_routes, f"Route '{url_name}' not found in router." for route in matching_routes: assert ( expected_prefix in route.pattern.describe() ), f"Prefix '{expected_prefix}' not found in route '{route.name}'." viewset = route.callback.cls assert issubclass( viewset, viewset_class ), f"Viewset for '{route.name}' does not match {viewset_class}." + + def test_nonexistent_route(self): + """Verify that a non-existent route name returns an empty list.""" + nonexistent_route = "non-existent-route" + matching_routes = [route for route in router.urls if route.name == nonexistent_route] + assert not matching_routes, f"Unexpectedly found a route named '{nonexistent_route}'."backend/tests/app/github/models/user_test.py (3)
35-52: Consider verifying attribute updates in test_update_data.While you're testing that the correct user is retrieved and the node_id matches, the test doesn't verify that the other attributes (bio, hireable, twitter_username) are properly updated from the mock GitHub user.
Consider adding assertions for these attributes:
mock_get.assert_called_once_with(node_id="12345") assert updated_user.node_id == "12345" + # Verify other attributes were updated + assert updated_user.bio == "Bio" + assert updated_user.is_hireable is True + assert updated_user.twitter_username == "twitter"
53-67: Enhance DoesNotExist test with attribute verification.Similar to the previous test, this one only verifies the node_id but not other attributes. Also, the mock_save is patched but its usage is not verified.
Consider adding assertions for attribute initialization and verifying that save was called:
mock_get.assert_called_once_with(node_id="67890") assert updated_user.node_id == "67890" + # Verify other attributes were set + assert updated_user.bio == "New Bio" + assert updated_user.is_hireable is False + assert updated_user.twitter_username == "new_twitter" + # Verify save was called if save=True was passed + mock_save.assert_called_once()
8-67: Add test case for when save=False parameter is used.The
update_datamethod appears to accept asaveparameter, but there's no test case that verifies the behavior whensave=Falseis passed.Consider adding an additional test case:
@patch("apps.github.models.user.User.objects.get") @patch("apps.github.models.user.User.save") def test_update_data_without_saving(self, mock_save, mock_get): gh_user_mock = Mock() gh_user_mock.raw_data = {"node_id": "12345"} mock_user = Mock(spec=User) mock_get.return_value = mock_user updated_user = User.update_data(gh_user_mock, save=False) mock_get.assert_called_once_with(node_id="12345") mock_save.assert_not_called()backend/tests/app/github/models/mixins/release_test.py (3)
9-9: Remove unnecessary parentheses from pytest fixture decorator.The static analysis tool correctly identifies that empty parentheses are unnecessary in the fixture decorator.
-@pytest.fixture() +@pytest.fixture def release_index_mixin_instance():🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
9-9: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
31-59: Test case duplication may cause confusion.There appear to be duplicate test cases for "idx_author", "idx_project", and "idx_published_at" in the parametrize list (lines 35-43, 51, 52 vs lines 55-57). While this is intentional for testing different scenarios (null/empty values vs populated values), it might be clearer to separate these into distinct test functions or add comments to explain the purpose of these duplicates.
Consider restructuring these test cases for better readability:
@pytest.mark.parametrize( ("attr", "expected"), [ ( "idx_author", [ { "avatar_url": "https://example.com/avatar.png", "login": "test_user", "name": "Test User", } ], ), ("idx_created_at", datetime(2023, 1, 1, tzinfo=timezone.utc).timestamp()), ( "idx_description", "This is a long description", ), ("idx_is_pre_release", True), ("idx_name", "Release v1.0.0"), ("idx_project", "mock/project"), ("idx_published_at", datetime(2023, 6, 1, tzinfo=timezone.utc).timestamp()), ("idx_repository", "mock/repository"), ("idx_tag_name", "v1.0.0"), + # Edge cases with null/empty values ("idx_author", []), ("idx_project", ""), ("idx_published_at", None), ], )Alternatively, consider creating separate test functions for normal cases and edge cases.
60-67: Consider using more explicit conditional logic for edge cases.The current approach of modifying the fixture instance in the test function works but might be difficult to maintain as more edge cases are added. Consider refactoring for better readability.
def test_release_index(release_index_mixin_instance, attr, expected): - if attr == "idx_author" and not expected: + # Handle edge cases where we test null/missing values + if attr == "idx_author" and isinstance(expected, list) and not expected: release_index_mixin_instance.author = None elif attr == "idx_project" and expected == "": release_index_mixin_instance.repository.project = None elif attr == "idx_published_at" and expected is None: release_index_mixin_instance.published_at = None assert getattr(release_index_mixin_instance, attr) == expectedbackend/tests/app/owasp/api/chapter_test.py (3)
5-5: Remove redundant blank lineThere's an unnecessary extra blank line here, as line 4 already provides spacing after the imports.
from apps.owasp.api.chapter import ChapterSerializer - @pytest.mark.parametrize(
6-30: Add negative test cases for validationThe current test cases only verify positive scenarios where validation succeeds. Consider adding negative test cases to test the serializer's validation logic when it should reject invalid data.
}, True, ), + ( + { + "name": "", # Empty name + "description": "A test chapter", + "level": "other", + "created_at": "2024-11-01T00:00:00Z", + "updated_at": "2024-07-02T00:00:00Z", + }, + False, + ), + ( + { + "name": "OWASP Nagoya", + "description": "A test chapter", + "level": "invalid_level", # Invalid level value + "created_at": "2024-11-01T00:00:00Z", + "updated_at": "2024-07-02T00:00:00Z", + }, + False, + ), ],
31-36: Enhance test assertions and fix missing newlineThe test only asserts that the validation result matches the expected boolean value, but doesn't verify any validation errors when validation fails. Additionally, the file is missing a newline character at the end.
def test_chapter_serializer_validation(data, expected): serializer = ChapterSerializer(data=data) is_valid = serializer.is_valid() assert is_valid == expected + + # For invalid cases, verify appropriate error messages + if not expected: + assert serializer.errors, "Expected validation errors but found none" + + # For valid cases, check serialized data structure + if expected: + assert serializer.validated_data["name"] == data["name"] + assert serializer.validated_data["description"] == data["description"] + assert serializer.validated_data["level"] == data["level"]backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/process_snapshots_test.py (2)
11-38: Good test implementation with proper mocking.This test is well-structured and follows testing best practices:
- Clear docstring explaining the test purpose
- Proper use of mock objects
- Effective use of context managers for patching
- Explicit assertion to verify the expected behavior
Consider using
spec=Snapshotfor the mock_snapshot (as you did in the next test) to ensure the mock behaves like the actual object.- mock_snapshot = mock.MagicMock() + mock_snapshot = mock.MagicMock(spec=Snapshot)
1-104: Consider adding a test for the process_snapshot method.While the current tests provide good coverage for the
process_snapshotsandhandlemethods, there doesn't appear to be a direct test for theprocess_snapshotmethod itself. Consider adding a test that focuses specifically on this method to ensure complete coverage.backend/tests/app/owasp/models/snapshot_test.py (5)
17-18: Consider using datetime objects instead of strings for date fields.While the current implementation works for testing, using actual datetime objects would better reflect how these fields are used in the real model and could catch type-related issues.
- self.snapshot.start_at = "2025-02-21" - self.snapshot.end_at = "2025-02-21" + from datetime import datetime + self.snapshot.start_at = datetime(2025, 2, 21) + self.snapshot.end_at = datetime(2025, 2, 21)
28-32: Test verifies mock functionality, but consider testing model behavior.This test confirms the mock is working correctly, but doesn't test actual model behavior. Consider adding tests that verify how the Snapshot model uses these relationships.
33-36: Use unittest assertion methods for better error messages.Using plain
assertstatements works, but unittest's assertion methods provide more descriptive error messages when tests fail.- assert self.snapshot.title == "Mock Snapshot Title" - assert self.snapshot.key == "2025-02" + self.assertEqual(self.snapshot.title, "Mock Snapshot Title") + self.assertEqual(self.snapshot.key, "2025-02")
21-27: Consider testing all mocked ManyToMany relationships.You've set up mocks for five different ManyToMany relationships, but only test one in the test_mocked_many_to_many_relations method. Consider expanding the test to verify all relationships or use a parameterized test approach.
def test_all_many_to_many_relations(self): """Test all ManyToMany relationships using mocks.""" test_data = ["Mock Item"] for field in ["new_chapters", "new_projects", "new_issues", "new_releases", "new_users"]: relation = getattr(self.snapshot, field) relation.set(test_data) relation.set.assert_called_once_with(test_data) relation.set.reset_mock() # Reset for next assertion
1-37: Consider adding more comprehensive test coverage.The current tests verify basic functionality, but consider adding tests for other Snapshot model behaviors, such as model methods, property calculations, or validation logic if applicable.
backend/tests/app/owasp/graphql/nodes/project_test.py (2)
22-22: Remove unnecessary parentheses from pytest.fixture decorator.According to Ruff PT001,
@pytest.fixtureis preferred over@pytest.fixture()when no arguments are needed.- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def mock_project(self):🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
22-22: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
63-78: Consider testing with non-empty results.The current test verifies method calls and empty list returns. Consider adding another test case with non-empty results to ensure the limiting logic works correctly with actual data.
For example:
def test_resolve_recent_issues_with_data(self, mock_project): """Test resolution of recent issues with actual data.""" mock_issues = [Mock() for _ in range(RECENT_ISSUES_LIMIT + 2)] # More than the limit mock_ordered_issues = mock_project.issues.select_related.return_value.order_by.return_value mock_ordered_issues.__getitem__.return_value = mock_issues[:RECENT_ISSUES_LIMIT] node = ProjectNode() node.issues = mock_project.issues result = node.resolve_recent_issues(None) assert len(result) == RECENT_ISSUES_LIMIT assert result == mock_issues[:RECENT_ISSUES_LIMIT]backend/tests/app/owasp/models/common_test.py (3)
51-93: Consider adding more test cases for metadata parsing.While the current test case is valid, adding more diverse test cases would strengthen testing for the
get_metadatamethod, including scenarios with:
- Missing fields
- Different value types
- Malformed YAML
- Empty YAML sections
@pytest.mark.parametrize( ("content", "expected_metadata"), [ ( "\n".join( # noqa: FLY002 ( "---", "layout: col-sidebar", "title: OWASP Oklahoma City", "tags: ", "level: 0", "region: North America", "auto-migrated: 0", "meetup-group: Oklahoma-City-Chapter-Meetup", "country: USA", "postal-code: 73101", "---", ) ), { "auto-migrated": 0, "country": "USA", "layout": "col-sidebar", "level": 0, "meetup-group": "Oklahoma-City-Chapter-Meetup", "postal-code": 73101, "region": "North America", "tags": None, "title": "OWASP Oklahoma City", }, ), + ( + "\n".join( + ( + "---", + "layout: col-sidebar", + "title: OWASP Test Project", + "---", + ) + ), + { + "layout": "col-sidebar", + "title": "OWASP Test Project", + }, + ), + ( + "Content without YAML frontmatter", + {}, + ), + ( + "---\nInvalid YAML\ncontent: - missing colon\n---", + {}, + ), ], )
132-150: Unnecessary mock in parse_tags test.The mock for
get_repository_file_contentdoesn't seem necessary for testing theparse_tagsmethod since the method is directly called with the test input. This suggests the mock may be leftover from copy-pasting previous test structure.def test_parse_tags(self, tags, expected_tags): model = EntityModel() - with patch( - "apps.owasp.models.common.get_repository_file_content", - return_value="---\nfield1: value1\nfield2: value2\n---", - ): - tags = model.parse_tags(tags) + tags = model.parse_tags(tags) assert tags == expected_tags
1-152: Consider adding negative test scenarios.The test suite is comprehensive for valid inputs but could be improved by testing error handling for invalid inputs. For example:
- How does
get_metadatahandle malformed YAML?- Does
get_leadershandle unexpected markdown formats gracefully?- Are there any exceptions that should be caught and handled?
backend/tests/app/owasp/api/event_test.py (3)
4-5: Consider following PEP8 style guide for blank lines.There are two consecutive blank lines after imports. PEP8 recommends using one blank line to separate logical sections of code.
import pytest from apps.owasp.api.event import EventSerializer - @pytest.mark.parametrize(
27-31: Enhance test to check error messages and validated data.The test only checks if validation passes or fails but doesn't verify error messages or the final validated data. Consider enhancing the test to also verify error messages for invalid inputs and the structure of the validated data for valid inputs.
def test_event_serializer_validation(data, expected): serializer = EventSerializer(data=data) is_valid = serializer.is_valid() assert is_valid == expected + + if expected: + # For valid data, verify the serialized data structure + assert 'name' in serializer.validated_data + assert 'description' in serializer.validated_data + assert 'url' in serializer.validated_data + else: + # For invalid data, verify that errors exist + assert serializer.errors, "Invalid data should produce error messages"
1-32: Consider adding docstrings to improve test readability.Adding docstrings to the test function would improve readability and make it clear what aspects of the EventSerializer are being tested.
@pytest.mark.parametrize( ("data", "expected"), [ # test cases... ], ) def test_event_serializer_validation(data, expected): + """ + Test the validation logic of the EventSerializer. + + This test verifies that the EventSerializer correctly validates event data + according to its validation rules. + + Args: + data: Input data to be validated + expected: Expected validation result (True/False) + """ serializer = EventSerializer(data=data) is_valid = serializer.is_valid() assert is_valid == expectedbackend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_aggregate_projects_test.py (4)
9-11: Remove parentheses from pytest.fixture decoratorsThe decorators should be simplified to
@pytest.fixturewithout empty parentheses according to pytest conventions.- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def command(self): return Command() - @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def mock_project(self):Also applies to: 13-20
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
9-9: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
16-17: Extract hardcoded URL to a constantThe OWASP URL is duplicated in both the fixture and assertion. Consider extracting it to a class constant to improve maintainability.
class TestOwaspAggregateProjects: + TEST_OWASP_URL = "https://owasp.org/www-project-test" + TEST_GITHUB_URL = "https://github.com/OWASP/test-repo" + @pytest.fixture() def mock_project(self): project = mock.Mock(spec=Project) - project.owasp_url = "https://owasp.org/www-project-test" - project.related_urls = {"https://github.com/OWASP/test-repo"} + project.owasp_url = self.TEST_OWASP_URL + project.related_urls = {self.TEST_GITHUB_URL}Then update the assertion:
for call in mock_print.call_args_list: args, _ = call - assert "https://owasp.org/www-project-test" in args[0] + assert self.TEST_OWASP_URL in args[0]Also applies to: 77-77
34-54: Move complex mock repository setup to a separate fixtureThe extensive mock repository setup makes the test method overly complex. Consider extracting this setup to a dedicated fixture to improve readability and reusability.
+ @pytest.fixture + def mock_repository(self): + mock_repository = mock.Mock() + mock_repository.organization = mock.Mock() + mock_repository.owner = mock.Mock() + mock_repository.is_archived = False + mock_repository.pushed_at = "2024-12-28T00:00:00Z" + mock_repository.latest_release = mock.Mock() + mock_repository.latest_release.published_at = "2024-12-27T00:00:00Z" + mock_repository.commits_count = 10 + mock_repository.contributors_count = 5 + mock_repository.forks_count = 2 + mock_repository.open_issues_count = 4 + mock_repository.releases.count.return_value = 1 + mock_repository.stars_count = 50 + mock_repository.subscribers_count = 3 + mock_repository.watchers_count = 7 + mock_repository.top_languages = ["Python", "JavaScript"] + mock_repository.license = "MIT" + mock_repository.topics = ["security", "owasp"] + return mock_repository @pytest.mark.parametrize( # ... ) @mock.patch.dict("os.environ", {"GITHUB_TOKEN": "test-token"}) @mock.patch.object(Project, "bulk_save", autospec=True) - def test_handle(self, mock_bulk_save, command, mock_project, offset, projects): - mock_organization = mock.Mock() - mock_repository = mock.Mock() - mock_repository.organization = mock_organization - mock_repository.owner = mock.Mock() - mock_repository.is_archived = False - mock_repository.pushed_at = "2024-12-28T00:00:00Z" - mock_repository.latest_release = mock.Mock() - mock_repository.latest_release.published_at = "2024-12-27T00:00:00Z" - mock_repository.commits_count = 10 - mock_repository.contributors_count = 5 - mock_repository.forks_count = 2 - mock_repository.open_issues_count = 4 - mock_repository.releases.count.return_value = 1 - mock_repository.stars_count = 50 - mock_repository.subscribers_count = 3 - mock_repository.watchers_count = 7 - mock_repository.top_languages = ["Python", "JavaScript"] - mock_repository.license = "MIT" - mock_repository.topics = ["security", "owasp"] + def test_handle(self, mock_bulk_save, command, mock_project, mock_repository, offset, projects):
56-64: Add explanatory comment for complex mock setupThe mock_active_projects setup uses advanced mocking techniques that may be difficult to understand at a glance. Consider adding explanatory comments.
mock_projects_list = [mock_project] * projects + # Create a mock for active_projects that supports iteration, counting, + # indexing (including slicing), and method chaining mock_active_projects = mock.MagicMock() mock_active_projects.__iter__.return_value = iter(mock_projects_list) mock_active_projects.count.return_value = len(mock_projects_list) + # Support both direct indexing and slicing mock_active_projects.__getitem__.side_effect = ( lambda idx: mock_projects_list[idx.start : idx.stop] if isinstance(idx, slice) else mock_projects_list[idx] ) + # Support method chaining (order_by returns self) mock_active_projects.order_by.return_value = mock_active_projectsbackend/tests/app/core/utils/match_test.py (2)
4-6: Consider adding docstrings for better documentationAdding a docstring to the test class would improve documentation and explain the purpose of these tests. This helps future developers understand the test context.
class TestParamsMapping: + """Test suite for the get_params_for_index function to ensure correct parameter mapping for different index types.""" def test_get_params_for_issues(self):
4-144: Consider reducing duplication in test assertionsEach test method contains similar base parameters (
attributesToHighlight,removeWordsIfNoResults,minProximity,typoTolerance). Consider refactoring to reduce duplication by using a common base dictionary that's extended with index-specific attributes.class TestParamsMapping: + def _get_base_params(self): + """Return the base parameters common to all index types.""" + return { + "attributesToHighlight": [], + "removeWordsIfNoResults": "allOptional", + "minProximity": 4, + "typoTolerance": "min", + } + def test_get_params_for_issues(self): result = get_params_for_index("issues") - expected = { - "attributesToHighlight": [], - "removeWordsIfNoResults": "allOptional", - "minProximity": 4, - "typoTolerance": "min", + expected = self._get_base_params() + expected.update({ "attributesToRetrieve": [ "idx_comments_count", "idx_created_at", # ... other attributes remain the same ], "distinct": 1, - } + }) assert result == expectedbackend/tests/app/owasp/api/search/issue_test.py (1)
1-42: LGTM! Good test coverage for the get_issues function.The test uses good practices such as parameterization and mocking, and it adequately verifies that the function returns the expected results.
Here are some suggestions to further enhance the test:
Consider verifying that
raw_searchis called with the correct parameters by adding:mock_raw_search.assert_called_once_with( query=query, index_name="issues", facet=None, page=page, hitsPerPage=None, distinct=False )Add tests for error handling scenarios (e.g., when
raw_searchraises an exception)Add a docstring to the test function to describe its purpose
backend/tests/app/owasp/api/search/committee_test.py (1)
1-38: LGTM! Good test implementation for the get_committees function.The test structure correctly follows testing best practices with parameterization and mocking.
Similar to the issue_test.py, consider these enhancements:
Verify the actual parameters passed to
raw_search:mock_raw_search.assert_called_once_with( query=query, index_name="committees", facet=None, page=page, hitsPerPage=None )Add a docstring to document the test's purpose
backend/tests/app/owasp/api/search/chapter_test.py (3)
9-10: URL mismatch in mocked data.The mocked chapter names don't match their URLs:
- "OWASP San Francisco" has URL ending with "www-chapter-nagoya"
- "OWASP New York" has URL ending with "www-chapter-seoul"
These inconsistencies should be fixed to make the test data more realistic.
- {"idx_name": "OWASP San Francisco", "idx_url": "https://owasp.org/www-chapter-nagoya/"}, - {"idx_name": "OWASP New York", "idx_url": "https://owasp.org/www-chapter-seoul/"}, + {"idx_name": "OWASP San Francisco", "idx_url": "https://owasp.org/www-chapter-san-francisco/"}, + {"idx_name": "OWASP New York", "idx_url": "https://owasp.org/www-chapter-new-york/"},
19-21: Inconsistent page parameter type.The page parameter is defined as a string in the test data, but the other test files use integers. For consistency, consider using integers here as well.
- ("security", "1", MOCKED_HITS), - ("web", "2", MOCKED_HITS), - ("", "1", MOCKED_HITS), + ("security", 1, MOCKED_HITS), + ("web", 2, MOCKED_HITS), + ("", 1, MOCKED_HITS),Then remove the
int()conversion in line 28:- result = get_chapters(query=query, page=int(page)) + result = get_chapters(query=query, page=page)
24-32: LGTM with minor suggestions.Consider enhancing the test by:
Verifying that
raw_searchis called with the expected parameters:mock_raw_search.assert_called_once_with( query=query, index_name="chapters", facet=None, page=page, hitsPerPage=None )Adding a docstring to document the test's purpose
backend/tests/app/owasp/api/search/project_test.py (1)
1-32: LGTM! Well-structured test for the get_projects function.The test follows the same pattern as the other search tests, which is good for consistency.
Consider these enhancements:
Verify the actual parameters passed to
raw_search:mock_raw_search.assert_called_once_with( query=query, index_name="projects", facet=None, page=page, hitsPerPage=None )Add a docstring to document the test's purpose
backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_sync_posts_test.py (2)
14-16: Stylistic improvement: Use@pytest.fixturewithout parenthesesThe static analysis tool correctly identified that pytest fixtures should preferably be declared without empty parentheses. While both forms work, the version without parentheses is more idiomatic.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixtureThis change should be applied to all three fixture declarations in this file (lines 14, 18, and 31).
Also applies to: 18-41
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
14-14: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
42-98: Test data inconsistency between mock repository files and mock contentThere's an inconsistency in the test data. Two different post files are defined in
mock_repository_fileswith different dates (2023-01-01 and 2023-01-02), but the samemock_post_contentis used for both, which only has the date 2023-01-01.While the test logic correctly differentiates the URLs in the assertions, it would be more realistic and thorough to have different mock content for each post that matches their respective filenames, particularly with different dates.
Consider creating a second mock content fixture or modifying the test to use different content for each post:
@pytest.fixture def mock_post_contents(self): return [ """--- title: Test Post date: 2023-01-01 author: John Doe author_image: /assets/images/people/john.jpg --- This is the content of the test post.""", """--- title: Another Post date: 2023-01-02 author: Jane Smith author_image: /assets/images/people/jane.jpg --- This is the content of another post.""" ]Then update the test to use these different contents and verify the correct data is extracted from each.
backend/tests/app/slack/common/contribute_test.py (2)
11-19: Consider adding more test cases to fully utilize parameterization.The test is well-structured but currently only has one test case in the parametrization. Adding more test cases would better leverage pytest's parameterization capability and provide more robust validation of the URL functions.
@pytest.mark.parametrize( ("expected_project_issues_url", "expected_projects_url"), [ ("projects/contribute", "projects"), + ("projects/contribute?q=test", "projects?filter=active"), + ("projects/contribute#section", "projects#top"), ], )
17-19: Include docstrings for better test documentation.Adding a docstring to explain the purpose of the test would improve code readability and maintenance. It helps other developers understand what's being tested and why.
def test_urls(self, expected_project_issues_url, expected_projects_url): + """ + Verify that project_issues_url and projects_url return correctly formatted absolute URLs. + Tests that the URL helpers in the contribute module properly format the paths. + """ assert project_issues_url == get_absolute_url(expected_project_issues_url) assert projects_url == get_absolute_url(expected_projects_url)backend/tests/app/slack/events/user_joined_channel/gsoc_test.py (3)
11-14: Use@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses.According to pytest best practices and the static analysis hint, you should use
@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses when no parameters are provided.- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def mock_slack_event(self): return {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID}🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
11-11: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
15-19: Use@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses.Similarly, this fixture should also use the decorator without parentheses to follow pytest best practices.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def mock_slack_client(self): client = MagicMock() client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}} return client🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
15-15: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
67-77: Consider simplifying the check_gsoc_handler import.The current approach to retrieve the
check_gsoc_handlerfunction is unnecessarily complex. You could directly import it at the top of the file alongside thegsoc_handlerimport for cleaner code.from apps.slack.constants import FEEDBACK_CHANNEL_MESSAGE, OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID -from apps.slack.events.member_joined_channel.gsoc import gsoc_handler +from apps.slack.events.member_joined_channel.gsoc import gsoc_handler, check_gsoc_handler ... def test_check_gsoc_handler(self, channel_id, expected_result): - gsoc_module = __import__( - "apps.slack.events.member_joined_channel.gsoc", - fromlist=["gsoc_handler"], - ) - check_gsoc_handler = getattr( - gsoc_module, - "check_gsoc_handler", - lambda x: x.get("channel") == OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID, - ) - assert check_gsoc_handler({"channel": channel_id}) == expected_resultIf the function might not exist (explaining the getattr with a default), consider using a try/except pattern for clarity.
backend/tests/app/slack/events/app_home_opened_test.py (2)
9-13: Use@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses.According to pytest best practices and the static analysis hint, you should use
@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses when no parameters are provided.- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def mock_slack_config(self, mocker): mock_app = Mock() mocker.patch("apps.slack.apps.SlackConfig.app", mock_app) return mock_app🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
9-9: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
24-41: Consider using separate patches for cleaner test structure.The nested patches with multiple mocks make the test structure complex. Consider using fixture-based mocks or separate patch decorators for better readability and maintenance.
- with ( - patch("apps.slack.events.app_home_opened.get_header") as mock_get_header, - patch("apps.slack.events.app_home_opened.markdown") as mock_markdown, - ): - mock_get_header.return_value = [ - {"type": "section", "text": {"type": "mrkdwn", "text": "Header"}} - ] - - mock_markdown.return_value = { - "type": "section", - "text": { - "type": "mrkdwn", - "text": ( - f"*Hi <@{mock_event['user']}>!* Welcome to the OWASP Slack Community!" - ), - }, - } + # Setup mocks before the test + mock_get_header = patch("apps.slack.events.app_home_opened.get_header").start() + mock_get_header.return_value = [ + {"type": "section", "text": {"type": "mrkdwn", "text": "Header"}} + ] + + mock_markdown = patch("apps.slack.events.app_home_opened.markdown").start() + mock_markdown.return_value = { + "type": "section", + "text": { + "type": "mrkdwn", + "text": f"*Hi <@{mock_event['user']}>!* Welcome to the OWASP Slack Community!", + }, + } + + # Run the test + app_home_opened_handler(mock_event, mock_client, mock_ack) + + # Stop the patches + patch.stopall()Alternatively, consider converting these to fixtures for more reusable test components.
backend/tests/app/slack/events/team_join_test.py (1)
9-13: Use@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses.According to pytest best practices and the static analysis hint, you should use
@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses when no parameters are provided.- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def mock_slack_config(self, mocker): mock_app = Mock() mocker.patch("apps.slack.apps.SlackConfig.app", mock_app) return mock_app🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
9-9: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/actions/home_test.py (2)
15-15: Style improvement: Use@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses.According to pytest best practices, fixtures should be declared without empty parentheses.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
15-15: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
19-19: Style improvement: Use@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses.According to pytest best practices, fixtures should be declared without empty parentheses.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
19-19: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/gsoc_test.py (2)
13-13: Style improvement: Use@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses.According to pytest best practices, fixtures should be declared without empty parentheses.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
13-13: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
20-20: Style improvement: Use@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses.According to pytest best practices, fixtures should be declared without empty parentheses.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
20-20: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/projects_test.py (3)
25-25: Style improvement: Use@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses.According to pytest best practices, fixtures should be declared without empty parentheses.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
25-25: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
32-32: Style improvement: Use@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses.According to pytest best practices, fixtures should be declared without empty parentheses.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
32-32: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
10-87: Consider creating shared fixtures across test files to reduce duplication.I notice that similar fixtures (
mock_command,mock_client, etc.) are duplicated across multiple test files in this PR. Consider moving these common fixtures to a sharedconftest.pyfile to improve maintainability.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
25-25: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
32-32: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/owasp_test.py (5)
10-10: Style improvement: Use@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses.According to pytest best practices, fixtures should be declared without empty parentheses.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
10-10: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
17-17: Style improvement: Use@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses.According to pytest best practices, fixtures should be declared without empty parentheses.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
17-17: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
23-23: Style improvement: Use@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses.According to pytest best practices, fixtures should be declared without empty parentheses.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
23-23: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
29-29: Style improvement: Use@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses.According to pytest best practices, fixtures should be declared without empty parentheses.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
29-29: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
35-35: Style improvement: Use@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses.According to pytest best practices, fixtures should be declared without empty parentheses.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
35-35: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/committees_test.py (2)
24-29: Consider removing parentheses from fixture decorator.The fixture functionality is correct, but according to Python style best practices, empty parentheses should be omitted from the pytest fixture decorator.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def mock_command(self):🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
24-24: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
31-35: Consider removing parentheses from fixture decorator.Same style recommendation as the previous fixture.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def mock_client(self):🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
31-31: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/staff_test.py (3)
12-17: Consider removing parentheses from fixture decorator.The fixture functionality is correct, but according to Python style best practices, empty parentheses should be omitted from the pytest fixture decorator.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def mock_slack_command(self):🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
13-13: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
19-23: Consider removing parentheses from fixture decorator.Same style recommendation as the previous fixture.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def mock_slack_client(self):🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
19-19: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
25-40: Consider removing parentheses from fixture decorator and good test data structure.The mock staff data is well-structured with realistic test values.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def mock_staff(self):🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
25-25: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/sponsors_test.py (2)
38-42: Consider removing parentheses from fixture decorator.The fixture functionality is correct, but according to Python style best practices, empty parentheses should be omitted from the pytest fixture decorator.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def mock_slack_command(self):🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
38-38: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
44-48: Consider removing parentheses from fixture decorator.Same style recommendation as the previous fixture.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def mock_slack_client(self):🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
44-44: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/chapters_test.py (2)
24-29: Consider removing parentheses from fixture decorator.The fixture functionality is correct, but according to Python style best practices, empty parentheses should be omitted from the pytest fixture decorator.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def mock_command(self):🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
24-24: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
31-35: Consider removing parentheses from fixture decorator.Same style recommendation as the previous fixture.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def mock_client(self):🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
31-31: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/common/handlers/projects_test.py (1)
10-10: Remove parentheses from pytest.fixture decoratorsThe static analysis tool has flagged that these decorators should not include empty parentheses. This is a style recommendation from the pytest team.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixtureAlso applies to: 28-28
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
10-10: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/events/user_joined_channel/contribute_test.py (1)
15-15: Remove parentheses from pytest.fixture decoratorsThe static analysis tool has flagged that these decorators should not include empty parentheses.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixtureAlso applies to: 19-19
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
15-15: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/leaders_test.py (1)
11-11: Remove parentheses from pytest.fixture decoratorsThe static analysis tool has flagged that these decorators should not include empty parentheses. Fix this across all fixtures in the file.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixtureAlso applies to: 18-18, 24-24, 32-32
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
11-11: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/events_test.py (1)
46-46: Remove parentheses from pytest.fixture decoratorsThe static analysis tool has flagged that these decorators should not include empty parentheses.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixtureAlso applies to: 52-52
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
46-46: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/common/handlers/committees_test.py (3)
10-10: Use@pytest.fixtureinstead of@pytest.fixture().Remove the empty parentheses to follow pytest best practices and match the static analyzer's recommendation.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
10-10: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
24-24: Use@pytest.fixtureinstead of@pytest.fixture().Remove the empty parentheses to follow pytest best practices and match the static analyzer's recommendation.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
24-24: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
140-148: Make the pagination offset test more maintainable.The test is hardcoding the expected string "11. " which could make it fragile if the presentation format changes. Consider using a more reliable assertion method.
def test_pagination_offset(self, setup_mocks, mock_committee_data): setup_mocks["get_committees"].return_value = mock_committee_data page = 2 limit = 10 blocks = get_blocks(page=page, limit=limit) # First item should be numbered 11 (offset + 1) - assert "11. " in blocks[1]["text"]["text"] + expected_offset = (page - 1) * limit + 1 + assert f"{expected_offset}. " in blocks[1]["text"]["text"]backend/tests/app/slack/common/handlers/chapters_test.py (3)
10-10: Use@pytest.fixtureinstead of@pytest.fixture().Remove the empty parentheses to follow pytest best practices and match the static analyzer's recommendation.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
10-10: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
26-26: Use@pytest.fixtureinstead of@pytest.fixture().Remove the empty parentheses to follow pytest best practices and match the static analyzer's recommendation.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
26-26: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
1-95: Consider adding missing test cases for chapter handler.The committee handler tests include several test cases that are missing from the chapter handler tests, such as tests for single leader formatting, search query escaping, and chapters without leaders. This inconsistency may indicate gaps in test coverage.
Consider adding the following test methods to ensure consistent coverage:
def test_search_query_escaping(self, setup_mocks, mock_chapter_data): setup_mocks["get_chapters"].return_value = mock_chapter_data dangerous_query = "test & <script>" blocks = get_blocks(search_query=dangerous_query) assert "&" in blocks[0]["text"]["text"] assert "<script>" in blocks[0]["text"]["text"] def test_chapter_without_leaders(self, setup_mocks): mock_data = { "hits": [ { "idx_name": "No Leaders Chapter", "idx_country": "Test Country", "idx_suggested_location": "Test Location", "idx_summary": "Test Summary", "idx_url": "https://example.com", } ], "nbPages": 1, } setup_mocks["get_chapters"].return_value = mock_data presentation = EntityPresentation(include_metadata=True) blocks = get_blocks(presentation=presentation) assert "Leaders:" not in blocks[1]["text"]["text"] def test_pagination_offset(self, setup_mocks, mock_chapter_data): setup_mocks["get_chapters"].return_value = mock_chapter_data page = 2 limit = 10 blocks = get_blocks(page=page, limit=limit) expected_offset = (page - 1) * limit + 1 assert f"{expected_offset}. " in blocks[1]["text"]["text"]🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
10-10: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
26-26: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/contribute_test.py (5)
17-17: Use@pytest.fixtureinstead of@pytest.fixture().Remove the empty parentheses to follow pytest best practices and match the static analyzer's recommendation.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
17-17: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
24-24: Use@pytest.fixtureinstead of@pytest.fixture().Remove the empty parentheses to follow pytest best practices and match the static analyzer's recommendation.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
24-24: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
53-61: Improve test assertion to verify message content.The test only verifies the number of calls to
chat_postMessagebut doesn't validate the content of the messages.def test_contribute_handler( self, mock_client, mock_command, commands_enabled, command_text, expected_calls ): settings.SLACK_COMMANDS_ENABLED = commands_enabled mock_command["text"] = command_text contribute_handler(ack=MagicMock(), command=mock_command, client=mock_client) assert mock_client.chat_postMessage.call_count == expected_calls + if expected_calls > 0: + # Verify message content based on command_text + blocks = mock_client.chat_postMessage.call_args[1]["blocks"] + if command_text == "-h": + assert any("help" in str(block).lower() for block in blocks) + elif command_text: + assert any(command_text in str(block) for block in blocks)
1-85: Add test for error scenarios.The test suite doesn't include tests for error handling, such as when API calls fail.
Consider adding a test case for error handling:
def test_contribute_handler_api_error(self, mock_get_contributions, mock_client, mock_command): settings.SLACK_COMMANDS_ENABLED = True mock_get_contributions.side_effect = Exception("API Error") contribute_handler(ack=MagicMock(), command=mock_command, client=mock_client) # Verify error message is sent blocks = mock_client.chat_postMessage.call_args[1]["blocks"] assert any("error" in str(block).lower() for block in blocks)🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
17-17: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
24-24: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
1-85: Missing test for check_contribute_handler function.Based on the pattern seen in other similar test files, there should be a test for the
check_contribute_handlerfunction to verify channel ID validation.Consider adding the following test method:
def test_check_contribute_handler(self): from apps.slack.commands.contribute import check_contribute_handler from django.conf import settings # Save original value original_channel_id = getattr(settings, "OWASP_CONTRIBUTE_CHANNEL_ID", None) try: # Test with matching channel ID settings.OWASP_CONTRIBUTE_CHANNEL_ID = "C123456" assert check_contribute_handler("C123456") is True # Test with non-matching channel ID assert check_contribute_handler("C789012") is False finally: # Restore original value settings.OWASP_CONTRIBUTE_CHANNEL_ID = original_channel_id🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
17-17: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
24-24: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/github/models/mixins/repository_test.py (1)
14-14: Use@pytest.fixtureinstead of@pytest.fixture()The parentheses are redundant when no arguments are provided to a decorator. Remove them for cleaner code.
-@pytest.fixture() +@pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
14-14: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/owasp/api/committee_test.py (2)
29-33: Enhance test function to check validation errors for negative test cases.For negative test cases, it's valuable to verify the specific validation errors returned by the serializer.
def test_committee_serializer_validation(data, expected): + """ + Test the CommitteeSerializer validation with various input data. + + This test verifies that the CommitteeSerializer correctly validates + committee data, accepting valid data and rejecting invalid data with + appropriate error messages. + """ serializer = CommitteeSerializer(data=data) is_valid = serializer.is_valid() assert is_valid == expected + + # For failed validation, verify the specific errors + if not expected: + assert serializer.errors, "Expected validation errors but none were found" + + # You can also check for specific error fields if needed + # For example: assert 'name' in serializer.errors
5-5: Remove unnecessary empty line.There's an extra empty line that can be removed for better code organization.
import pytest from apps.owasp.api.committee import CommitteeSerializer - @pytest.mark.parametrize(backend/tests/app/github/graphql/queries/repository_test.py (1)
14-17: Simplify pytest fixture declarationsAccording to the project's linting rules, pytest fixtures should be declared without parentheses.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def mock_info(self): """GraphQL info mock fixture.""" return Mock() - @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def mock_project(self): """Project mock fixture.""" return Mock(spec=Project)Also applies to: 19-22
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
14-14: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/github/models/mixins/user_test.py (1)
10-11: Simplify pytest fixture declarationAccording to the project's linting rules, pytest fixtures should be declared without parentheses.
-@pytest.fixture() +@pytest.fixture def user_index_mixin_instance():🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
10-10: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/owasp/graphql/queries/committee_test.py (1)
34-37: Simplify pytest fixture declarationsAccording to the project's linting rules, pytest fixtures should be declared without parentheses.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def mock_committee(self): """Committee mock fixture.""" return Mock(spec=Committee) - @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def mock_info(self): """GraphQL info mock fixture.""" return Mock()Also applies to: 39-42
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
34-34: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/github/utils_test.py (2)
46-54: Consider adding more test cases for get_repository_pathThe test only includes one case (which expects a None result). Consider adding more cases with valid repository URLs that return expected paths.
@pytest.mark.parametrize( ("url", "expected"), [ ("github.com/user/repo", None), + ("https://github.com/user/repo", "user/repo"), + ("https://github.com/owasp/nest", "owasp/nest"), + ("http://github.com/user/repo/", "user/repo"), ], )
67-68: Add newline at end of fileStatic analysis flagged that the file is missing a newline at the end.
def test_normalize_url_with_invalid_url(self): result = normalize_url("invalid-url") assert result is None +backend/tests/app/common/utils_test.py (1)
85-85: Add newline at end of fileStatic analysis flagged that the file is missing a newline at the end.
mocker.patch.dict(settings._wrapped.__dict__, {"PUBLIC_IP_ADDRESS": "1.1.1.1"}) assert get_user_ip_address(request) == "1.1.1.1" +🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
85-85: No newline at end of file
Add trailing newline
(W292)
backend/tests/app/slack/utils_test.py (3)
155-155: Rename test to remove trailing underscoreThe test method name has a trailing underscore which is inconsistent with the naming convention of other test methods.
-def test_get_gsoc_projects_(monkeypatch): +def test_get_gsoc_projects(monkeypatch):
200-207: Clarify variable purpose and assertionsThe reuse of the
lengthvariable with different values is confusing, especially for the assertion ofmock_get.call_count.- length = 2 - result_limited = get_news_data(limit=2) - assert len(result_limited) == length + limit_value = 2 + result_limited = get_news_data(limit=limit_value) + assert len(result_limited) == limit_value mock_get.assert_called_with(OWASP_NEWS_URL, timeout=30) result2 = get_news_data() - assert mock_get.call_count == length + # Should be called twice: once for initial call and once for result2 + assert mock_get.call_count == 2 assert result == result2
226-226: Add newline at end of fileAdd a trailing newline to comply with standard code style practices.
"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/OWASP/owasp.github.io/main/_data/staff.yml", timeout=30 ) +backend/tests/app/common/open_ai_test.py (1)
17-17: Remove empty parentheses from pytest fixture decoratorAccording to pytest best practices, you should use
@pytest.fixtureinstead of@pytest.fixture()when no arguments are needed.- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def openai_instance(self): return OpenAi()🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
17-17: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/owasp/graphql/queries/project_test.py (4)
35-38: Simplify pytest fixture declaration.Remove the empty parentheses from the pytest.fixture decorator for cleaner code.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def mock_project(self): """Project mock fixture.""" return Mock(spec=Project)🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
35-35: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
40-43: Simplify pytest fixture declaration.Remove the empty parentheses from the pytest.fixture decorator for cleaner code.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def mock_info(self): """GraphQL info mock fixture.""" return Mock()🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
40-40: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
45-53: Add a comment explaining the key transformation logic.The test shows that the input key "test-project" gets transformed to "www-project-test-project" when querying the database. This transformation logic should be documented with a comment for clarity.
def test_resolve_project_existing(self, mock_project, mock_info): """Test resolving an existing project.""" with patch("apps.owasp.models.project.Project.objects.get") as mock_get: mock_get.return_value = mock_project result = ProjectQuery.resolve_project(None, mock_info, key="test-project") assert result == mock_project + # Verify that the key is transformed by prepending "www-project-" prefix mock_get.assert_called_once_with(key="www-project-test-project")
55-63: Add a comment explaining the key transformation logic.Similar to the previous test, document the key transformation for better code clarity.
def test_resolve_project_not_found(self, mock_info): """Test resolving a non-existent project.""" with patch("apps.owasp.models.project.Project.objects.get") as mock_get: mock_get.side_effect = Project.DoesNotExist result = ProjectQuery.resolve_project(None, mock_info, key="non-existent") assert result is None + # Verify that the key is transformed by prepending "www-project-" prefix mock_get.assert_called_once_with(key="www-project-non-existent")backend/tests/app/common/graphql/nodes_test.py (1)
15-18: Add a comment explaining the metaclass check.Line 18 is checking that BaseNode is an instance of DjangoObjectType's metaclass, which is a more advanced Python concept. Add a comment explaining this check for better understanding.
def test_base_node_meta(self): """Test if BaseNode Meta is properly configured.""" assert hasattr(BaseNode, "_meta") + # Verify that BaseNode uses the same metaclass as DjangoObjectType assert isinstance(BaseNode, DjangoObjectType.__class__)backend/tests/app/github/api/label_test.py (1)
5-5: Remove extra blank lineThere's an extra blank line here that could be removed for cleaner code.
backend/tests/app/github/api/issue_test.py (4)
5-5: Remove extra blank lineThere's an extra blank line here that could be removed.
30-30: Include error details in assertionFor better debugging, include serializer.errors in the assertion message like in label_test.py:
- assert serializer.is_valid() + assert serializer.is_valid(), serializer.errors
32-37: Reduce code duplication in datetime formattingThe datetime formatting logic is duplicated. Consider extracting it to a helper function to make the test more maintainable:
- validated_data["created_at"] = ( - validated_data["created_at"].isoformat().replace("+00:00", "Z") - ) - validated_data["updated_at"] = ( - validated_data["updated_at"].isoformat().replace("+00:00", "Z") - ) + for field in ["created_at", "updated_at"]: + validated_data[field] = ( + validated_data[field].isoformat().replace("+00:00", "Z") + )
15-16: Consider using realistic test datesThe test uses future dates (December 2024). While not a functional issue now, consider using past dates to avoid potential problems if date validation is added in the future.
Also applies to: 23-24
backend/tests/app/github/api/release_test.py (5)
5-5: Remove extra blank linesThere are unnecessary blank lines at lines 5 and 30 that could be removed.
Also applies to: 30-30
28-28: Include error details in assertionFor better debugging, include serializer.errors in the assertion message:
- assert serializer.is_valid() + assert serializer.is_valid(), serializer.errors
31-36: Reduce code duplication in datetime formattingThe datetime formatting logic is duplicated. Consider extracting it to a helper function:
- validated_data["created_at"] = ( - validated_data["created_at"].isoformat().replace("+00:00", "Z") - ) - validated_data["published_at"] = ( - validated_data["published_at"].isoformat().replace("+00:00", "Z") - ) + for field in ["created_at", "published_at"]: + validated_data[field] = ( + validated_data[field].isoformat().replace("+00:00", "Z") + )
14-15: Consider using realistic test datesThe test uses future dates (December 2024). Consider using past dates to avoid potential issues if date validation is implemented in the future.
Also applies to: 21-22
1-37: Consider a common test utility for serializer testsThe pattern of validating serializers and formatting dates is repeated across multiple test files. Consider extracting this logic into a common test utility function or base class to reduce duplication across the test suite.
backend/tests/app/github/graphql/nodes/user_test.py (1)
7-7: Remove extra blank lineThere's an extra blank line here that could be removed.
backend/tests/app/github/graphql/nodes/repository_test.py (2)
43-46: Unused parameter in test methodsThe
mockerparameter is passed to several test methods but is never used within them.Remove the unused parameter from the test methods that don't use it:
-def test_resolve_languages(self, mocker): +def test_resolve_languages(self):Apply similar changes to the other test methods that don't use the mocker parameter.
Also applies to: 48-51, 53-56, 58-61, 63-66, 68-71
11-72: Add docstrings to test methodsAdding descriptive docstrings to test methods improves readability and makes the purpose of each test clear.
Add descriptive docstrings to each test method. For example:
def test_repository_node_inheritance(self): + """Test that RepositoryNode inherits from BaseNode.""" assert issubclass(RepositoryNode, BaseNode)backend/tests/app/common/management/commands/load_data_test.py (3)
6-34: Add docstrings to test class and methodAdding descriptive docstrings improves code readability and maintainability.
Add docstrings to the test class and method:
class TestLoadDataCommand: + """Test cases for the LoadData management command.""" @patch("apps.common.management.commands.load_data.unregister_indexes") @patch("apps.common.management.commands.load_data.register_indexes") @patch("apps.common.management.commands.load_data.call_command") @patch("apps.common.management.commands.load_data.transaction.atomic") def test_handle( self, mock_atomic, mock_call_command, mock_register, mock_unregister, ): + """Test that the handle method executes the expected operations in the correct order."""
25-26: Remove unnecessary mock return valuesThese lines set the return values to
None, which is already the default for mocks.- mock_unregister.return_value = None - mock_register.return_value = None
32-32: Consider making the hardcoded path more maintainableHardcoded file paths in tests can lead to maintenance issues if the actual path changes.
Consider extracting the file path as a constant or class attribute:
+ DATA_FILE_PATH = "data/nest.json.gz" + @patch("apps.common.management.commands.load_data.unregister_indexes") # ... other patches def test_handle(self, ...): # ... existing code - mock_call_command.assert_called_once_with("loaddata", "data/nest.json.gz", "-v", "3") + mock_call_command.assert_called_once_with("loaddata", self.DATA_FILE_PATH, "-v", "3")backend/tests/app/owasp/models/post_test.py (3)
22-23: Use a more reliable date for testingUsing future dates (2025) in tests might lead to unexpected behavior if the tests are run after that date.
Consider using a fixed past date or a relative date based on the current date:
- published_at=datetime(2025, 1, 1, tzinfo=timezone.utc), + # Using a past date ensures test stability regardless of when it's run + published_at=datetime(2020, 1, 1, tzinfo=timezone.utc),
41-41: Use consistent date references in test dataSimilar to the previous comment, avoid using future dates in test data to ensure test reliability.
Replace the future date (2025) with a past date in all test data.
Also applies to: 48-48
33-75: Add negative test cases for data validationThe current parametrized tests only cover valid data scenarios. Adding tests for invalid data would improve coverage.
Consider adding test cases with invalid data, such as:
- Missing required fields
- Invalid URLs
- Invalid date formats
This will ensure the model's validation logic is properly tested.
backend/tests/app/common/management/commands/algolia_update_replicas_test.py (1)
27-30: Grammar issue in success messageThe success message has a minor grammatical error.
- "\n Replica have been Successfully created.\n" + "\n Replicas have been successfully created.\n"backend/tests/app/owasp/models/project_health_metrics_test.py (1)
14-14: Remove empty parentheses from pytest.fixture decoratorAccording to the static analysis tool, empty parentheses should be removed from the
pytest.fixturedecorator.- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
14-14: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/common/geocoding_test.py (4)
7-7: Remove unnecessary blank line.There's an extra blank line between imports and class definition.
- - class TestGeocoding:
8-31: Add docstrings to test methods.Adding docstrings to test methods would improve readability and maintainability by clearly stating the purpose of each test.
class TestGeocoding: @pytest.mark.parametrize( ("query", "mock_latitude", "mock_longitude"), [ ("San Francisco, CA", 37.7749, -122.4194), ], ) @patch("apps.common.geocoding.Nominatim.geocode") def test_get_location_coordinates( self, mock_geocode, query, mock_latitude, mock_longitude, ): + """Test that get_location_coordinates returns correct coordinates for valid location query.""" mock_geocode.return_value = MagicMock(latitude=mock_latitude, longitude=mock_longitude) with ( patch("apps.common.geocoding.time.sleep", return_value=None), patch("apps.common.geocoding.get_nest_user_agent", return_value="test_agent"), ): result = get_location_coordinates(query) assert result.latitude == mock_latitude assert result.longitude == mock_longitude
9-14: Consider adding more test cases for parameterized test.The current parametrized test only includes one test case. Adding more diverse test cases would increase coverage and ensure the function works correctly with different inputs.
@pytest.mark.parametrize( ("query", "mock_latitude", "mock_longitude"), [ ("San Francisco, CA", 37.7749, -122.4194), + ("New York, NY", 40.7128, -74.0060), + ("Tokyo, Japan", 35.6762, 139.6503), ], )
32-40: Add docstring to test_get_location_coordinates_none method.Similar to the other test method, this one would benefit from a docstring explaining its purpose.
def test_get_location_coordinates_none(self): + """Test that get_location_coordinates returns None for invalid location query.""" query = "Invalid Location" with ( patch("apps.common.geocoding.time.sleep", return_value=None), patch("apps.common.geocoding.Nominatim.geocode", return_value=None), patch("apps.common.geocoding.get_nest_user_agent", return_value="test_agent"), ): result = get_location_coordinates(query) assert result is Nonebackend/tests/app/github/api/repository_test.py (2)
6-36: Add docstrings and test invalid data scenarios.The test class and method would benefit from docstrings explaining their purpose. Additionally, the test only covers valid data scenarios. Consider adding tests for invalid data to ensure the serializer properly validates input.
class TestRepositorySerializer: + """Test cases for the RepositorySerializer.""" + @pytest.mark.parametrize( "repository_data", [ { "name": "Repo1", "description": "Description for Repo1", "created_at": "2024-12-30T00:00:00Z", "updated_at": "2024-12-30T00:00:00Z", }, { "name": "Repo2", "description": "Description for Repo2", "created_at": "2024-12-29T00:00:00Z", "updated_at": "2024-12-30T00:00:00Z", }, ], ) def test_repository_serializer(self, repository_data): + """Test that the repository serializer correctly validates and processes valid data.""" serializer = RepositorySerializer(data=repository_data) assert serializer.is_valid() validated_data = serializer.validated_data validated_data["created_at"] = ( validated_data["created_at"].isoformat().replace("+00:00", "Z") ) validated_data["updated_at"] = ( validated_data["updated_at"].isoformat().replace("+00:00", "Z") ) assert validated_data == repository_data
24-35: Add test for invalid data scenarios.The current test only covers valid data. Consider adding a test case for invalid data to ensure the serializer properly rejects it.
+ @pytest.mark.parametrize( + "invalid_repository_data", + [ + { + "name": "Repo1", + # Missing required fields + }, + { + "name": "Repo2", + "description": "Description for Repo2", + "created_at": "invalid-date-format", + "updated_at": "2024-12-30T00:00:00Z", + }, + ], + ) + def test_repository_serializer_invalid_data(self, invalid_repository_data): + """Test that the repository serializer correctly identifies invalid data.""" + serializer = RepositorySerializer(data=invalid_repository_data) + assert not serializer.is_valid()backend/tests/app/github/graphql/queries/user_test.py (2)
17-20: Fix pytest fixture declarations.Remove parentheses from pytest.fixture decorators to follow Pytest guidelines.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def mock_info(self): """GraphQL info mock fixture.""" return Mock() - @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def mock_user(self): """User mock fixture.""" return Mock(spec=User)Also applies to: 22-25, 46-49, 51-54
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
17-17: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
14-54: Consider consolidating fixtures.The
mock_infoandmock_userfixtures are duplicated between the two test classes. Consider moving them to the module level or using a base test class.You could consolidate the fixtures outside of both classes:
+@pytest.fixture +def mock_info(): + """GraphQL info mock fixture.""" + return Mock() + + +@pytest.fixture +def mock_user(): + """User mock fixture.""" + return Mock(spec=User) + + class TestUserQuery: """Test cases for UserQuery class.""" - @pytest.fixture() - def mock_info(self): - """GraphQL info mock fixture.""" - return Mock() - - @pytest.fixture() - def mock_user(self): - """User mock fixture.""" - return Mock(spec=User) -Then update the second class similarly to use the shared fixtures.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
17-17: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
22-22: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
46-46: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
51-51: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_scrape_committees_test.py (1)
14-16: Remove empty parentheses from pytest.fixture decorators.According to coding standards and static analysis hints, you should use
@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses when no arguments are provided.- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def command(self): return Command() - @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def mock_committee(self):Also applies to: 18-20
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
14-14: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_scrape_projects_test.py (2)
16-18: Consider removing parentheses from fixture declarationStatic analysis suggests using
@pytest.fixtureinstead of@pytest.fixture()for better adherence to pytest conventions.- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def command(self): return Command()🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
16-16: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
20-22: Consider removing parentheses from fixture declarationStatic analysis suggests using
@pytest.fixtureinstead of@pytest.fixture()for better adherence to pytest conventions.- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture def mock_project(self): project = mock.Mock(spec=Project)🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
20-20: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/github/models/repository_test.py (2)
29-29: Remove unnecessary parentheses from pytest.fixture decoratorAccording to pytest best practices, fixture decorators should be used without empty parentheses.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
29-29: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
71-76: Consider enhancing the latest_release testThe current test for latest_release is quite minimal - it's only testing that the mock attribute works, not any actual functionality of the Repository class related to releases.
Consider enhancing this test to verify how the Repository class uses or processes the latest_release information, rather than just testing that the mock attribute works.
backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_scrape_chapters_test.py (2)
14-14: Remove unnecessary parentheses from pytest.fixture decoratorAccording to pytest best practices, fixture decorators should be used without empty parentheses.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
14-14: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
18-18: Remove unnecessary parentheses from pytest.fixture decoratorAccording to pytest best practices, fixture decorators should be used without empty parentheses.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
18-18: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/github/management/commands/github_update_project_related_repositories_test.py (3)
12-14: Minor style improvement: Use@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses.The current
@pytest.fixture()usage works but can be simplified to@pytest.fixturewhen no parameters are needed.-@pytest.fixture() +@pytest.fixture def command(): return Command()🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
12-12: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
17-23: Minor style improvement: Use@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses.Similar to the previous fixture, remove empty parentheses for cleaner code.
-@pytest.fixture() +@pytest.fixture def mock_project(): project = mock.Mock(spec=Project) project.owasp_url = "https://owasp.org/www-project-test" project.related_urls = {"https://github.com/OWASP/test-repo"} project.invalid_urls = set() return project🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
17-17: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
97-97: Consider more specific output verification.The test verifies that something was printed, but not what was printed. Consider adding assertions to verify the content of the print calls for more thorough testing.
# Example improvement to verify print content assert any("Processing project" in call_args[0][0] for call_args in mock_print.call_args_list)backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_enrich_chapters_test.py (2)
13-15: Minor style improvement: Use@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses.The current
@pytest.fixture()usage works but can be simplified to@pytest.fixturewhen no parameters are needed.-@pytest.fixture() +@pytest.fixture def command(self): return Command()🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
13-13: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
17-25: Minor style improvement: Use@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses.Similar to the previous fixture, remove empty parentheses for cleaner code.
-@pytest.fixture() +@pytest.fixture def mock_chapter(self): chapter = mock.Mock(spec=Chapter) chapter.owasp_url = "https://owasp.org/www-chapter-test" chapter.summary = None chapter.suggested_location = None chapter.latitude = None chapter.longitude = None return chapter🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
17-17: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/owasp/graphql/queries/chapter_test.py (2)
34-37: Consider updating fixture syntax.The test fixtures are well defined, but there's a minor style issue.
-@pytest.fixture() +@pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
34-34: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
39-42: Consider updating fixture syntax.Similar to the previous fixture, this can be simplified.
-@pytest.fixture() +@pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
39-39: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/common/models_test.py (2)
9-16: Consider updating fixture syntax.The fixture is well-defined, but could follow the recommended style.
-@pytest.fixture() +@pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
9-9: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
18-24: Consider updating fixture syntax.Similar to the previous fixture, this can be simplified.
-@pytest.fixture() +@pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
18-18: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/core/api/algolia_test.py (1)
21-26: Consider updating fixture syntax.The fixture is well-defined, but could follow the recommended style.
-@pytest.fixture() +@pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
21-21: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_enrich_committees_test.py (2)
13-16: Consider updating fixture syntax.The fixture is well-defined, but could follow the recommended style.
-@pytest.fixture() +@pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
13-13: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
17-22: Consider updating fixture syntax.Similar to the previous fixture, this can be simplified.
-@pytest.fixture() +@pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
17-17: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/github/api/user_test.py (2)
18-19: Consider using past dates in test dataThe test data contains future dates (e.g., "2024-12-30T00:00:00Z"). Using future dates in tests can potentially cause issues if tests are run after these dates, as system behavior might change. Consider using past dates or dates relative to the current time to ensure test stability and long-term validity.
- "created_at": "2024-12-30T00:00:00Z", - "updated_at": "2024-12-30T00:00:00Z", + "created_at": "2023-01-15T00:00:00Z", + "updated_at": "2023-01-15T00:00:00Z",Similarly update the second test case dates.
Also applies to: 26-27
43-45: Consider simplifying datetime format conversionThe code is manually formatting datetime objects to ISO 8601 format with 'Z' suffix. Django Rest Framework provides utilities that can make this conversion cleaner and more maintainable.
- validated_data["created_at"] = ( - validated_data["created_at"].isoformat().replace("+00:00", "Z") - ) - validated_data["updated_at"] = ( - validated_data["updated_at"].isoformat().replace("+00:00", "Z") - ) + from rest_framework.utils.representation import datetime_to_string + validated_data["created_at"] = datetime_to_string(validated_data["created_at"]) + validated_data["updated_at"] = datetime_to_string(validated_data["updated_at"])Alternatively, if you prefer to keep your current approach, consider extracting this to a helper function to avoid duplication.
Also applies to: 46-48
backend/tests/app/common/index_test.py (1)
71-71: Fix pytest fixture styleAccording to the static analysis tool,
@pytest.fixture()should be written as@pytest.fixturewithout parentheses.- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixture🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
71-71: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_enrich_projects_test.py (3)
13-13: Fix pytest fixture styleAccording to the static analysis tool, the pytest fixtures should be written without parentheses.
- @pytest.fixture() + @pytest.fixtureThis should be applied to both fixture decorators on lines 13 and 17.
Also applies to: 17-17
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
13-13: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
48-50: Consider simplifying the mock side_effectThe current implementation of the side effect is slightly complex. Consider using a simpler approach with a lambda function or a dedicated method for better readability.
- mock_project.generate_summary.side_effect = lambda *_args, **__kwargs: setattr( - mock_project, "summary", "Generated summary" - ) + def set_summary(*_args, **__kwargs): + mock_project.summary = "Generated summary" + mock_project.generate_summary.side_effect = set_summaryAlternatively, for a more concise approach:
- mock_project.generate_summary.side_effect = lambda *_args, **__kwargs: setattr( - mock_project, "summary", "Generated summary" - ) + mock_project.generate_summary.side_effect = lambda *_, **__: setattr(mock_project, "summary", "Generated summary")
54-74: Consider simplifying mock setup with helper methodsThe setup for
mock_active_projectsandmock_active_projects_without_summaryis duplicated and complex. Consider extracting this to a helper method to reduce duplication and improve readability.+ def create_mock_projects_queryset(mock_projects_list): + mock_queryset = mock.MagicMock() + mock_queryset.__iter__.return_value = iter(mock_projects_list) + mock_queryset.count.return_value = len(mock_projects_list) + mock_queryset.__getitem__.side_effect = ( + lambda idx: mock_projects_list[idx.start : idx.stop] + if isinstance(idx, slice) + else mock_projects_list[idx] + ) + mock_queryset.order_by.return_value = mock_queryset + return mock_queryset + mock_projects_list = [mock_project] * projects - - mock_active_projects = mock.MagicMock() - mock_active_projects.__iter__.return_value = iter(mock_projects_list) - mock_active_projects.count.return_value = len(mock_projects_list) - mock_active_projects.__getitem__.side_effect = ( - lambda idx: mock_projects_list[idx.start : idx.stop] - if isinstance(idx, slice) - else mock_projects_list[idx] - ) - mock_active_projects.order_by.return_value = mock_active_projects - - mock_active_projects_without_summary = mock.MagicMock() - mock_active_projects_without_summary.__iter__.return_value = iter(mock_projects_list) - mock_active_projects_without_summary.count.return_value = len(mock_projects_list) - mock_active_projects_without_summary.__getitem__.side_effect = ( - lambda idx: mock_projects_list[idx.start : idx.stop] - if isinstance(idx, slice) - else mock_projects_list[idx] - ) - mock_active_projects_without_summary.order_by.return_value = ( - mock_active_projects_without_summary - ) + mock_active_projects = create_mock_projects_queryset(mock_projects_list) + mock_active_projects_without_summary = create_mock_projects_queryset(mock_projects_list)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (103)
.gitignore(1 hunks)backend/apps/common/index.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/common/geocoding_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/common/graphql/nodes_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/common/graphql/queries_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/common/index_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/common/management/commands/add_project_custom_tags_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/common/management/commands/algolia_update_replicas_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/common/management/commands/algolia_update_synonyms_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/common/management/commands/load_data_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/common/management/commands/purge_data_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/common/models_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/common/open_ai_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/common/utils_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/core/api/algolia_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/core/utils/match_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/core/validators_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/api/issue_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/api/label_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/api/organization_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/api/release_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/api/repository_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/api/urls_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/api/user_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/graphql/nodes/issue_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/graphql/nodes/release_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/graphql/nodes/repository_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/graphql/nodes/user_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/graphql/queries/repository_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/graphql/queries/user_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/management/commands/github_enrich_issues_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/management/commands/github_update_owasp_organization_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/management/commands/github_update_project_related_repositories_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/models/issue_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/models/label_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/models/mixins/issue_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/models/mixins/organization_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/models/mixins/release_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/models/mixins/repository_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/models/mixins/user_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/models/organization_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/models/release_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/models/repository_contributor_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/models/repository_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/models/user_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/github/utils_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/api/chapter_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/api/committee_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/api/event_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/api/project_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/api/search/chapter_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/api/search/committee_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/api/search/issue_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/api/search/project_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/api/urls_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/graphql/nodes/project_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/graphql/queries/chapter_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/graphql/queries/committee_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/graphql/queries/project_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_aggregate_projects_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_enrich_chapters_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_enrich_committees_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_enrich_projects_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_scrape_chapters_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_scrape_committees_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_scrape_projects_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_sync_posts_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_update_project_health_requirements_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/process_snapshots_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/models/chapter_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/models/committee_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/models/common_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/models/event_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/models/mixins/common_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/models/post_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/models/project_health_metrics_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/models/project_health_requirements_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/models/project_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/models/snapshot_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/models/sponsors_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/owasp/scraper_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/slack/actions/home_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/slack/commands/chapters_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/slack/commands/committees_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/slack/commands/contribute_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/slack/commands/events_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/slack/commands/gsoc_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/slack/commands/leaders_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/slack/commands/owasp_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/slack/commands/projects_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/slack/commands/sponsors_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/slack/commands/staff_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/slack/common/contribute_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/slack/common/handlers/chapters_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/slack/common/handlers/committees_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/slack/common/handlers/projects_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/slack/events/app_home_opened_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/slack/events/team_join_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/slack/events/url_verification_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/slack/events/user_joined_channel/contribute_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/slack/events/user_joined_channel/gsoc_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/app/slack/utils_test.py(1 hunks)docker/docker-compose-local.yaml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (8)
backend/tests/app/common/management/commands/algolia_update_replicas_test.py (2)
backend/tests/app/common/management/commands/algolia_update_synonyms_test.py (2)
_setup(15-24)test_handle_exception(62-72)backend/tests/app/common/index_test.py (1)
_setup(112-124)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/chapters_test.py (4)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/committees_test.py (3)
mock_get_absolute_url(10-13)mock_command(25-29)mock_client(32-35)backend/tests/app/slack/commands/contribute_test.py (3)
mock_get_absolute_url(10-13)mock_command(18-22)mock_client(25-28)backend/tests/app/slack/commands/owasp_test.py (4)
mock_get_absolute_url(42-45)mock_command(11-15)mock_client(18-21)mock_get_chapters(24-27)backend/tests/app/slack/commands/projects_test.py (3)
mock_get_absolute_url(11-14)mock_command(26-30)mock_client(33-36)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/contribute_test.py (4)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/chapters_test.py (3)
mock_get_absolute_url(10-13)mock_command(25-29)mock_client(32-35)backend/tests/app/slack/commands/committees_test.py (3)
mock_get_absolute_url(10-13)mock_command(25-29)mock_client(32-35)backend/tests/app/slack/commands/owasp_test.py (3)
mock_get_absolute_url(42-45)mock_command(11-15)mock_client(18-21)backend/tests/app/slack/commands/projects_test.py (3)
mock_get_absolute_url(11-14)mock_command(26-30)mock_client(33-36)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/committees_test.py (4)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/chapters_test.py (3)
mock_get_absolute_url(10-13)mock_command(25-29)mock_client(32-35)backend/tests/app/slack/commands/contribute_test.py (3)
mock_get_absolute_url(10-13)mock_command(18-22)mock_client(25-28)backend/tests/app/slack/commands/owasp_test.py (4)
mock_get_absolute_url(42-45)mock_command(11-15)mock_client(18-21)mock_get_committees(30-33)backend/tests/app/slack/commands/projects_test.py (3)
mock_get_absolute_url(11-14)mock_command(26-30)mock_client(33-36)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/projects_test.py (4)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/chapters_test.py (3)
mock_get_absolute_url(10-13)mock_command(25-29)mock_client(32-35)backend/tests/app/slack/commands/committees_test.py (3)
mock_get_absolute_url(10-13)mock_command(25-29)mock_client(32-35)backend/tests/app/slack/commands/contribute_test.py (3)
mock_get_absolute_url(10-13)mock_command(18-22)mock_client(25-28)backend/tests/app/slack/commands/owasp_test.py (4)
mock_get_absolute_url(42-45)mock_command(11-15)mock_client(18-21)mock_get_projects(36-39)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/owasp_test.py (4)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/chapters_test.py (3)
mock_command(25-29)mock_client(32-35)mock_get_chapters(38-41)backend/tests/app/slack/commands/committees_test.py (3)
mock_command(25-29)mock_client(32-35)mock_get_committees(38-41)backend/tests/app/slack/commands/contribute_test.py (2)
mock_command(18-22)mock_client(25-28)backend/tests/app/slack/commands/projects_test.py (3)
mock_command(26-30)mock_client(33-36)mock_get_projects(39-42)
backend/tests/app/common/management/commands/algolia_update_synonyms_test.py (2)
backend/tests/app/common/management/commands/algolia_update_replicas_test.py (2)
_setup(15-20)test_handle_exception(34-43)backend/tests/app/common/index_test.py (1)
_setup(112-124)
backend/tests/app/common/models_test.py (1)
backend/tests/app/common/index_test.py (1)
mock_model(72-76)
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
backend/tests/app/slack/events/url_verification_test.py
9-9: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
16-16: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/events/app_home_opened_test.py
9-9: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/github/graphql/queries/repository_test.py
14-14: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
19-19: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/owasp/graphql/queries/committee_test.py
34-34: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
39-39: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/owasp/models/project_health_metrics_test.py
14-14: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/github/models/mixins/release_test.py
9-9: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_scrape_projects_test.py
16-16: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
20-20: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/staff_test.py
13-13: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
19-19: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
25-25: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/owasp/scraper_test.py
13-13: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
21-21: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
38-38: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/core/api/algolia_test.py
21-21: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/chapters_test.py
24-24: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
31-31: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/common/handlers/projects_test.py
10-10: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
28-28: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/github/models/mixins/user_test.py
10-10: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/contribute_test.py
17-17: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
24-24: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/leaders_test.py
11-11: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
18-18: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
24-24: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
32-32: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/events/user_joined_channel/gsoc_test.py
11-11: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
15-15: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/common/handlers/committees_test.py
10-10: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
24-24: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_scrape_committees_test.py
14-14: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
18-18: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/gsoc_test.py
13-13: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
20-20: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_sync_posts_test.py
14-14: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
18-18: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
31-31: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_enrich_chapters_test.py
13-13: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
17-17: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/events/team_join_test.py
9-9: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/owasp/graphql/queries/project_test.py
35-35: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
40-40: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/committees_test.py
24-24: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
31-31: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/github/management/commands/github_update_owasp_organization_test.py
35-35: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
40-40: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/projects_test.py
25-25: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
32-32: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/common/open_ai_test.py
17-17: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_enrich_committees_test.py
13-13: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
17-17: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/actions/home_test.py
15-15: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
19-19: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/events_test.py
46-46: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
52-52: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/sponsors_test.py
38-38: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
44-44: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/github/management/commands/github_update_project_related_repositories_test.py
12-12: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
17-17: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/github/models/mixins/issue_test.py
14-14: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/owasp_test.py
10-10: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
17-17: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
23-23: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
29-29: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
35-35: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/common/utils_test.py
85-85: No newline at end of file
Add trailing newline
(W292)
backend/tests/app/owasp/graphql/nodes/project_test.py
22-22: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/owasp/graphql/queries/chapter_test.py
34-34: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
39-39: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_scrape_chapters_test.py
14-14: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
18-18: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/github/models/repository_test.py
29-29: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_aggregate_projects_test.py
9-9: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
13-13: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/common/index_test.py
71-71: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/common/models_test.py
9-9: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
18-18: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/events/user_joined_channel/contribute_test.py
15-15: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
19-19: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/github/models/mixins/repository_test.py
14-14: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/github/graphql/queries/user_test.py
17-17: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
22-22: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
46-46: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
51-51: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_enrich_projects_test.py
13-13: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
17-17: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/common/handlers/chapters_test.py
10-10: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
26-26: Use @pytest.fixture over @pytest.fixture()
Remove parentheses
(PT001)
🔇 Additional comments (163)
backend/tests/app/github/models/mixins/issue_test.py (1)
1-78: Well-structured test implementation with good coverage.This test file provides comprehensive test coverage for the
IssueIndexMixinclass. The parameterized test approach efficiently verifies all index attributes in a clean, maintainable way. The fixture setup is thorough and clearly establishes the test data.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
14-14: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/events/url_verification_test.py (1)
1-7: Well-structured imports.The imports are correctly organized following Python's best practices with standard library imports first, followed by third-party imports, and then application-specific imports.
backend/tests/app/owasp/models/mixins/common_test.py (2)
1-5: Clean import structure.The imports are well-organized with standard library imports first (pytest), followed by application-specific imports, with appropriate spacing between them.
7-10: Good approach for testing mixins.Creating a concrete model class that inherits from the target mixins is a good practice for testing mixins. The comment explaining why
abstract = Falseis set provides helpful context.backend/tests/app/owasp/scraper_test.py (3)
1-215: Well-structured test suite with comprehensive coverageThis test suite provides excellent coverage for the
OwaspScraperclass with well-organized test cases that:
- Cover happy paths and error conditions
- Test various HTTP status codes and redirect scenarios
- Verify URL handling and extraction with different constraints
- Validate error handling and logging
- Use fixtures and parametrization effectively to minimize code duplication
The tests align well with the PR objective of improving quality and reducing duplication.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
13-13: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
21-21: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
38-38: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
46-57: Good error handling test coverageYour tests explicitly verify how the scraper handles multiple error cases (parser errors, request exceptions, timeouts). This comprehensive error handling is particularly important for network-dependent code like scrapers.
Also applies to: 159-165, 209-214
75-101: Excellent use of parametrizationThe use of
@pytest.mark.parametrizeto test multiple redirect status codes is a great practice that reduces code duplication while ensuring comprehensive test coverage.backend/tests/app/github/management/commands/github_update_owasp_organization_test.py (3)
109-120: Good implementation of the custom PaginatedListMock classNice work on implementing the custom
PaginatedListMockclass that inherits from list and maintains thetotalCountproperty during slicing. This correctly mimics GitHub's API pagination behavior and helps isolate tests from external dependencies.
48-175: Well-structured parameterized test with comprehensive coverageThe test_handle function is well-structured with parameterization that covers various scenarios:
- Different repository name patterns (project, chapter, committee)
- Testing with specific repository names and with None
- Testing with different offsets
The mocking approach effectively isolates the test from external dependencies, and the assertions properly verify the expected behaviors. This aligns well with the PR's objective to improve code quality.
1-175: Overall excellent test implementationThis test file provides thorough coverage of the GitHub organization update command functionality. The tests are well-organized, use appropriate fixtures and mocks, and effectively verify the behavior of the command with different inputs. The parameterized approach makes the tests concise yet comprehensive.
The implementation aligns well with the PR objectives to improve code quality and maintainability. Great job avoiding hardcoded values and properly structuring the tests.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
35-35: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
40-40: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/owasp/api/urls_test.py (1)
1-32: Test structure and parametrization look good!The test file effectively uses pytest's parametrize decorator to validate router registration for multiple viewsets. The assertions provide clear error messages which will help with debugging if tests fail.
backend/tests/app/github/api/urls_test.py (3)
1-10: LGTM: Imports are clear and well-organizedThe imports are well-structured, with the pytest framework imported first, followed by all the relevant viewsets and the router that will be tested.
12-23: Well-structured parameterized testThe parameterization of the test cases is clean and follows pytest best practices. The test covers all the main viewsets (issues, labels, organizations, releases, repositories, and users) with their expected URL prefixes.
28-36: Robust validation of route configurationThe test correctly validates both the URL pattern and the viewset class for each route. The assertions include helpful error messages that will make debugging easier if a test fails.
backend/tests/app/github/models/user_test.py (3)
1-7: Well-organized imports with appropriate spacing.The imports are properly organized with standard library imports first, followed by third-party imports, and then application-specific imports. This follows the PEP 8 style guide recommendation.
8-20: Good use of parameterized tests for string representation.The test effectively verifies multiple scenarios for the User model's string representation using pytest's parameterization. This is a best practice that makes the tests more maintainable and readable while reducing code duplication.
21-34: LGTM: Clean test for from_github method.The test properly validates that attributes from a GitHub user are correctly transferred to a User model instance. The assertions are clear and focused on the behavior being tested.
backend/tests/app/github/models/mixins/release_test.py (1)
1-68: LGTM: Well-structured test with good coverageOverall, this is a well-structured test file that thoroughly tests the ReleaseIndexMixin class. The test covers both standard cases and edge cases (null values), and uses pytest fixtures and parameterization effectively to reduce code duplication.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
9-9: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/owasp/api/chapter_test.py (1)
1-4: Import statements look goodThe imports are appropriately structured, bringing in the necessary pytest module and the ChapterSerializer from the correct module.
backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/process_snapshots_test.py (4)
1-10: Well-structured imports with clean organization.The imports are properly organized with standard library imports first, followed by third-party libraries, and then application-specific imports. There's also good use of blank lines to separate import groups.
39-73: Thorough error handling test with comprehensive assertions.This test effectively verifies the error path:
- Properly mocks required objects and dependencies
- Simulates an exception scenario
- Verifies multiple aspects of error handling (status update, error message, logging, saving)
The test coverage here is excellent, covering both the happy path and error scenarios.
74-91: Effective test for empty result handling.Good test for the case when no pending snapshots exist:
- Clear setup with appropriate mocking
- Specific assertion to verify the expected log message
- Focused on a single responsibility
The test is concise and verifies an important edge case.
92-104: Good exception propagation test.This test properly verifies that the
handlemethod correctly propagates exceptions by:
- Using pytest's exception testing mechanism
- Checking the exact error message
- Confirming the correct exception type is raised
Clean implementation that follows pytest's recommended approach for testing exceptions.
backend/tests/app/owasp/models/snapshot_test.py (1)
11-27: Good use of MagicMock for isolated testing.The setUp method is well-structured, properly mocking the Snapshot model and its ManyToMany relationships to avoid database interactions. This is good practice for unit testing.
backend/tests/app/owasp/graphql/nodes/project_test.py (5)
24-40: LGTM! Well-structured mock setup.The fixture provides a comprehensive mock project with all necessary attributes and behavior needed for the tests. The setup clearly mocks the related objects and their method chains, making the tests robust and isolated from actual database operations.
92-114: Well-implemented field validation.Good approach to exclude custom fields when verifying that node fields exist in the model. This prevents false negatives while ensuring the GraphQL node accurately represents the underlying model structure.
1-17: LGTM! Good organization of imports.The imports are well-structured, separating standard library imports from third-party and application-specific imports.
42-62: LGTM! Thorough testing of node structure.These tests properly verify the inheritance hierarchy and field configurations, ensuring that the GraphQL node is correctly set up.
79-91: Same feedback as for recent_issues test.Similar to the test_resolve_recent_issues feedback, consider adding a test case with non-empty results to verify the limiting logic with actual data.
backend/tests/app/owasp/models/common_test.py (6)
1-7: Appropriate imports and structure.The imports are well-organized, separating standard library imports from third-party and application imports with blank lines.
9-13: Good test implementation of abstract model.The
EntityModelclass is correctly implemented as a concrete version ofRepositoryBasedEntityModelfor testing purposes, withabstract = Falseto allow instantiation.
16-49: Well-structured parameterized test for leader extraction.The test effectively covers various markdown formats and edge cases for leader extraction. The parametrization approach provides good test coverage with minimal code duplication.
95-106: Good test for github_url property.The test effectively validates the URL construction logic with different keys.
108-119: Good test for owasp_url property.Similar to the github_url test, this properly validates the OWASP URL construction.
121-130: Well-structured test for deactivate method.The test effectively verifies both the state change and the correct parameters for the save method call.
backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_aggregate_projects_test.py (2)
22-30: Good use of parameterized testingThe test effectively uses pytest's parameterization to test multiple combinations of offset and project counts, which provides good coverage of the command's behavior under different conditions.
72-77: Good verification approachThe assertions correctly verify both that the bulk_save method was called and that the expected number of projects were processed based on the offset. The verification of the URL in the output is also a good practice.
backend/tests/app/core/utils/match_test.py (2)
1-144: Well-structured test suite that follows a consistent pattern.This is a comprehensive test suite that covers various index types for the
get_params_for_indexfunction. The tests follow a consistent structure which is good for maintainability.
52-53:✅ Verification successful
Verify the
aroundLatLngViaIPparameterWhile this parameter doesn't contain a hardcoded IP address directly, it does indicate geolocation lookup based on IP. This seems to align with the PR objective of removing hardcoded IP addresses. Please verify that the underlying implementation doesn't use hardcoded IPs when this parameter is set to
True.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Find references to aroundLatLngViaIP in the codebase to verify implementation rg "aroundLatLngViaIP" --type py -C 3Length of output: 1398
No hardcoded IPs detected for
aroundLatLngViaIPusageAfter reviewing the code references, it appears that the
aroundLatLngViaIPparameter is solely used as a flag inbackend/apps/core/utils/index.py(and verified in related test files) without any hardcoded IP addresses. Please ensure that the dynamic geolocation lookup remains intact, but from our review, the implementation meets the PR objective without embedding any fixed IPs.backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_sync_posts_test.py (2)
1-8: Well-structured and thorough test suiteThe test suite is well-structured with a good separation of concerns:
- Constants for reused values
- Fixtures for test data
- Comprehensive test coverage including success case and edge cases
- Proper use of mocking to isolate the command being tested
The tests thoroughly verify the command's behavior in different scenarios:
- Successful processing of posts
- Handling posts without front matter
- Handling when update_data returns None
This approach helps ensure the command is robust and handles various input conditions correctly.
Also applies to: 10-13, 99-118, 119-144
42-98:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify URL construction logic
The test asserts that specific URLs are constructed for each post:
https://owasp.org/blog/2023/01/01/test-post.htmlhttps://owasp.org/blog/2023/01/02/another-post.htmlThe URL construction appears to use the post date and name rather than just the filename. This is a good pattern, but it would be helpful to verify this logic is consistent with the actual implementation.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Find how the URL is constructed in the Command implementation grep -r "url.*=" --include="*.py" backend/apps/owasp/management/commands/Length of output: 3678
Action Required: Verify URL Transformation Logic
The test asserts that post URLs are constructed as follows:
https://owasp.org/blog/2023/01/01/test-post.htmlhttps://owasp.org/blog/2023/01/02/another-post.htmlOur grep output from
backend/apps/owasp/management/commands/owasp_sync_posts.pyreveals that the command retrieves the URL via:download_url = repository_file.get("download_url")However, there isn’t clear evidence from the file showing any transformation of this
download_urlinto the date-and-title-based blog URL format the tests expect. Please verify that:
- The transformation from the repository file’s
download_urlto the final blog URL (which integrates the post’s publication date and slug) is correctly implemented.- The logic used to construct the URL is consistent with both production needs and the test assertions.
Review the implementation in the command and ensure that any adjustments in URL formatting are appropriately reflected in the tests.
backend/tests/app/slack/events/app_home_opened_test.py (1)
46-64: LGTM! Good asserting of expected view structure.The assertions properly verify that the handler correctly formats and sends the home view with the expected content structure. The test effectively validates both the function call and the content structure of the view.
backend/tests/app/slack/events/team_join_test.py (1)
35-45: Good use of block content checking.The approach of extracting and checking the text from the message blocks is effective. The assertions properly verify that all expected content is present in the welcome message.
backend/tests/app/slack/actions/home_test.py (1)
14-63: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage for handle_home_actions.The test suite covers all essential aspects including:
- Handling different action IDs
- Verifying view blocks
- Error handling for SlackApiError
The test mocking is well-structured with appropriate fixtures to isolate functionality.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
15-15: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
19-19: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/gsoc_test.py (1)
12-91: Well-structured tests with good coverage of gsoc_handler functionality.The test suite effectively:
- Tests both enabled and disabled commands
- Validates different command inputs
- Verifies project display in responses
The parameterized approach minimizes code duplication while ensuring comprehensive coverage.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
13-13: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
20-20: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/projects_test.py (1)
62-86: Good testing of projects_handler with realistic project data.The test effectively validates that project information is correctly formatted in the Slack message blocks, with a comprehensive test project object that covers all relevant fields.
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/owasp_test.py (2)
47-60: Great use of Python's context manager with multiple mocks.The
_mock_active_countsfixture efficiently uses Python's context manager with multiple mocks in a single with statement. This is a clean pattern for mocking multiple related calls.
87-124: Excellent parameterized testing of subcommand delegation.The test effectively verifies that the owasp_handler properly delegates to the appropriate subcommand handlers for each OWASP command variant. The implementation with side effects ensures complete validation of the command flow.
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/committees_test.py (5)
9-13: Well-structured mock fixture.This fixture effectively mocks the
get_absolute_urlutility function to return a consistent URL for testing purposes, helping isolate the test from external dependencies.
16-20: Good implementation of fixture for mocking committee count.The fixture correctly mocks the
active_committees_countmethod, ensuring tests run with a consistent and predictable value.
37-41: Good implementation of mock for get_committees.This fixture effectively isolates the test from actual API calls by mocking the committee search functionality.
43-60: Well-structured parametrized test.This test effectively checks different scenarios based on whether commands are enabled and whether search queries are provided, ensuring the handler behaves as expected in all cases.
61-79: Comprehensive test for results scenario.This test thoroughly verifies that committee data is properly formatted and included in the response when results are available. The assertions check both the presence of expected committee details in the response blocks.
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/staff_test.py (1)
42-86: Comprehensive parametrized test with thorough assertions.This test effectively checks the behavior of the staff_handler under different conditions:
- When commands are disabled
- When commands are enabled with staff data
- When commands are enabled without staff data
The assertions thoroughly verify the behavior in each case, including checking the content and formatting of the response messages.
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/sponsors_test.py (5)
1-9: Good documentation and imports.The file includes a clear docstring and appropriate imports for testing the sponsors command handler.
11-32: Well-structured mock class and test data.The
MockSponsorclass and mock sponsors list provide realistic test data with appropriate attributes for testing the sponsors handler functionality.
50-73: Well-structured parametrized test.This test effectively checks the behavior of the sponsors_handler under different scenarios with appropriate parameters and setup.
74-86: Good handling of disabled commands scenario.The test correctly verifies that no Slack API calls are made when commands are disabled.
87-118: Thorough verification of response structure and content.The test performs detailed assertions on the response structure and content, ensuring that sponsor information is correctly formatted in the message blocks.
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/chapters_test.py (5)
9-14: Well-structured mock fixture.This fixture effectively mocks the
get_absolute_urlutility function, ensuring consistent testing behavior.
16-21: Good implementation of fixture for mocking chapter count.The fixture correctly mocks the
active_chapters_countmethod, ensuring tests run with a consistent and predictable value.
37-42: Good implementation of mock for get_chapters.This fixture effectively isolates the test from actual API calls by mocking the chapter search functionality.
43-61: Well-structured parametrized test with multiple scenarios.This test effectively checks different scenarios, including the help flag "-h", ensuring the handler behaves correctly in all cases.
62-84: Comprehensive test for results scenario.This test thoroughly verifies that chapter data is properly formatted and included in the response when results are available.
backend/tests/app/slack/common/handlers/projects_test.py (2)
103-111: Good security practice: properly testing query escapingThe test for search query escaping is a great practice, as it validates that user input is properly sanitized before being displayed in Slack messages. This helps prevent potential XSS-like issues in the Slack interface.
35-42: LGTM: Effective mocking patternThe autouse fixture that patches external dependencies is a clean approach that avoids repetitive setup code across test methods. This reduces code duplication which aligns with the PR objectives.
backend/tests/app/slack/events/user_joined_channel/contribute_test.py (2)
25-42: Good use of parameterizationThis is a good approach using parameterized tests to handle both enabled and disabled event scenarios. The comprehensive test cases ensure proper behavior in all situations.
82-93: Solid defensive programming with getattr fallbackUsing getattr with a fallback implementation is a robust approach to handle cases where the function might not be directly accessible or changes in the future. This makes tests more resilient to implementation changes.
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/leaders_test.py (2)
80-111: Excellent security testing for special charactersThe parameterized test for special character handling is a strong security practice. It ensures that potentially dangerous characters in user input are properly escaped before being displayed in Slack messages.
113-155: Comprehensive testing of output formattingThe test for leader formatting with multiple test cases is thorough and ensures the output will be consistent across different data scenarios. This is particularly important for maintaining a professional UI/UX in Slack responses.
backend/tests/app/slack/commands/events_test.py (2)
11-20: Well-structured mock classUsing a dedicated mock class to represent events provides better type safety and readability compared to simple dictionaries. This is a good practice that makes the tests more maintainable.
92-123: Detailed verification of response structureThe detailed assertions against the response blocks are excellent - they verify not just that some content exists, but the exact structure and content of the response. This thorough validation ensures the handler behaves correctly.
backend/tests/app/github/models/mixins/repository_test.py (3)
1-7: LGTM: Import structure is clean and organizedThe imports are well organized with standard library imports first, followed by third-party libraries, and then application-specific imports.
8-12: LGTM: Constants are well-definedUsing uppercase constants for test values is a good practice for maintainability.
15-31: LGTM: Fixture is comprehensiveThe fixture properly initializes all necessary attributes for testing the
RepositoryIndexMixinclass..gitignore (1)
38-38: LGTM: Added .qodo to gitignoreThis addition helps ensure the
.qododirectory or files are properly excluded from version control.backend/tests/app/github/models/mixins/organization_test.py (1)
6-18: Well-structured test for Organization index mixinGood implementation of parametrized tests that verify the concatenation logic of the
idx_nameandidx_companyattributes. This helps reduce code duplication while providing clear test coverage.backend/tests/app/github/graphql/queries/repository_test.py (1)
1-66: Well-structured test file with comprehensive coverage!The tests thoroughly cover all resolution paths for repositories, including both happy path and error cases. Good use of mocking and assertions throughout.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
14-14: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
19-19: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/github/management/commands/github_enrich_issues_test.py (1)
1-116: Excellent test implementation with comprehensive coverage!The tests thoroughly cover both argument parsing and command handling logic, with excellent use of parameterization to test multiple scenarios. The mock setup is robust and verifies all conditional paths in the command handler.
backend/tests/app/github/models/mixins/user_test.py (1)
1-112: Well-implemented tests with comprehensive coverage!The tests thoroughly cover both the indexability logic and all index fields. Excellent use of fixtures and parameterization to maintain clean test code.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
10-10: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/owasp/graphql/queries/committee_test.py (1)
1-63: Well-organized test file with good separation of concerns!The tests are well-structured with separate test classes for query structure and resolution logic. Good coverage of both happy path and error cases.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
34-34: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
39-39: Use
@pytest.fixtureover@pytest.fixture()Remove parentheses
(PT001)
backend/tests/app/github/models/repository_contributor_test.py (1)
1-47: LGTM! Well-structured test suite for RepositoryContributor.The tests are comprehensive and cover the key functionality of the class. Each test method is focused and has clear assertions. Good use of mocking to isolate the code being tested.
backend/tests/app/owasp/models/committee_test.py (1)
1-99: Well-structured test cases with comprehensive coverage!The test suite covers all essential functionality of the Committee model, including string representation, active committees count, save method with conditional summary generation, bulk save operations, and GitHub integration. Good use of parametrization and mocking throughout.
backend/tests/app/core/validators_test.py (1)
1-117: Thorough validation test cases with good error handling verification!This test suite comprehensively covers both valid and invalid input scenarios for all validator functions. The parametrized tests effectively verify error messages and edge cases, providing solid test coverage.
backend/tests/app/owasp/models/chapter_test.py (4)
33-53: Well-implemented location generation tests with thorough mocking!The test correctly validates location generation behavior across different input combinations using appropriate mocking of location services. All edge cases are properly covered.
65-93: Comprehensive testing of suggested location generation with proper OpenAI mocking!The test thoroughly verifies the conditional behavior of location suggestion, including input preparation, prompt setting, and result handling. Great job with the detailed assertions on the mock object interactions.
127-150: Good test coverage for save method's conditional behavior!The test properly verifies that location-related methods are only called when needed, using parameterization to cover all possible combinations of suggested location and coordinates presence.
157-194: Well-structured GitHub integration test with proper field mapping verification!The test thoroughly validates that repository data is correctly mapped to chapter attributes, with appropriate mocking of the parent method.
backend/tests/app/common/open_ai_test.py (2)
7-14: Good use of constants to replace magic values!Using named constants improves readability and maintainability of the test code by eliminating magic values.
54-65: Good error handling test with proper exception verification!The test properly verifies that the OpenAI client handles exceptions gracefully, returns None, and logs the error appropriately.
backend/tests/app/common/graphql/queries_test.py (1)
1-14: LGTM! Test checks the basic inheritance structure.The test verifies that BaseQuery inherits from ObjectType, which is fundamental to the GraphQL schema design.
backend/tests/app/github/graphql/nodes/release_test.py (1)
11-37: LGTM! Well-structured tests for ReleaseNode.The tests verify the inheritance hierarchy, field configuration, and special fields like author. The use of set comparison for fields is a clean approach to ensure all expected fields are present without being affected by order.
backend/tests/app/github/api/label_test.py (2)
1-28: Well-structured test implementation!The test class is well-organized, using pytest's parametrization to efficiently test multiple label data scenarios against the LabelSerializer. This approach reduces code duplication and ensures consistent validation across different label types.
24-24: Good error reporting in assertionIncluding
serializer.errorsin the assertion message will provide useful debug information when tests fail - this is an excellent practice.backend/tests/app/github/api/issue_test.py (1)
1-38: Well-structured test implementation with parameterized test casesThe test file is well-organized and uses parameterization effectively to test multiple scenarios.
backend/tests/app/github/api/release_test.py (1)
1-37: Well-structured test with parameterized casesThe test implementation is clear, concise, and follows best practices with pytest's parameterization.
backend/tests/app/github/graphql/nodes/user_test.py (3)
1-39: Well-documented test implementationThis test file is properly documented with clear docstrings for both the class and methods. The tests are thorough, checking both inheritance and meta configuration.
11-13: Good inheritance checkThis test appropriately verifies that UserNode inherits from BaseNode, which helps ensure the expected class hierarchy is maintained.
15-38: Comprehensive field verificationThe Meta configuration test thoroughly verifies all expected fields, which will catch any accidental field changes or removals. This is excellent for maintaining backward compatibility.
backend/tests/app/github/graphql/nodes/issue_test.py (1)
1-28: LGTM! Well-structured test with good docstringsThe test class is well-organized with clear docstrings explaining the purpose of each test method. Good job maintaining a clean and readable testing approach.
backend/tests/app/owasp/models/post_test.py (1)
1-106: LGTM! Well-structured and comprehensive testsThe tests are well-organized, with good use of parameterization, docstrings, and mocking. The test coverage appears comprehensive, testing different aspects of the Post model.
backend/tests/app/github/models/release_test.py (1)
1-45: Well-structured test file with good coverageThe test suite thoroughly covers the functionality of the
Releasemodel, including thebulk_save,update_data, andfrom_githubmethods. Each test isolates and verifies a specific behavior, which is a good testing practice.backend/tests/app/github/api/organization_test.py (1)
1-55: Well-implemented test suite for OrganizationSerializerThe test class effectively validates both the
OrganizationSerializerand theget_loginsmethod of theOrganizationmodel. The parameterized tests provide good coverage of different input scenarios, and the mocking approach ensures tests run without actual database access.backend/tests/app/github/api/repository_test.py (1)
10-21:✅ Verification successful
Review test dates in the future.
The test dates (2024-12-30, 2024-12-29) appear to be in the future. Consider using dates in the past to avoid potential issues if the code checks for valid date ranges.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the dates used in tests are in the future echo "Current date: $(date)" echo "Test is using dates like 2024-12-30 which may be in the future" # Search for any date validation logic in the RepositorySerializer rg -A 5 -B 5 "created_at|updated_at" --include "*.py" | grep -i "valid\|date"Length of output: 759
Test dates verified: No changes required.
After verifying the test data inbackend/tests/app/github/api/repository_test.pyand searching for any date validation logic (e.g., in aRepositorySerializer), it turns out that—as of the current execution date (Mar 25, 2025)—the hard-coded dates (2024-12-30and2024-12-29) are already in the past. Moreover, our search did not reveal any logic that would treat these dates as invalid. There’s no need to update these static dates at this time.backend/tests/app/owasp/models/sponsors_test.py (1)
8-94: Well-structured and comprehensive tests.Your test implementation is excellent, with clear docstrings, good use of parameterization for multiple test cases, and thorough coverage of the Sponsor model's functionality. The tests cover string representation, property access, bulk saving, and dictionary mapping - all key aspects of the model.
backend/tests/app/common/management/commands/algolia_update_synonyms_test.py (1)
1-84: Good job! This test file is well-structured with comprehensive test coverage.This new test file provides excellent coverage of the
algolia_update_synonymscommand. I particularly like:
- The well-organized test fixture with proper mocking of dependencies
- Parameterized tests covering multiple scenarios with various count combinations
- Proper exception handling test with appropriate assertions
- Test for mixed results when one index returns None
This comprehensive test suite ensures the command behaves correctly under various conditions, making it resilient to future changes.
backend/tests/app/github/models/organization_test.py (1)
1-40: Good implementation of model tests with appropriate mocking.The test cases effectively cover the Organization model's core functionality:
- String representation
- Bulk saving
- Data updates with proper exception handling
- GitHub conversion
Your approach of isolating each test with appropriate mocking is excellent practice, ensuring tests are focused and independent of external dependencies.
backend/tests/app/github/models/issue_test.py (1)
1-71: Excellent test coverage with robust parameterized testing.This test file provides thorough coverage of the Issue model:
- Basic properties and string representation tests
- Repository ID access test
- Bulk save functionality with proper mocking
- Exception handling during update_data
- Parameterized test for the save method covering all combinations of hint/summary presence
The parameterized testing approach for the save method is particularly efficient, as it tests all possible combinations without code duplication.
backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_scrape_committees_test.py (1)
28-93: Excellent parameterized test with thorough validation.Your test implementation for the
handlemethod is very comprehensive:
- Using parameterization to test various offset and committee count combinations
- Thorough mocking of dependencies including environment variables
- Proper verification of bulk_save being called
- Detailed validation of print calls and URL processing
This thorough approach ensures the command behaves correctly across different input scenarios.
backend/tests/app/owasp/models/event_test.py (1)
1-30: LGTM - Well-structured test file for Event modelThe new test file provides good coverage for the Event model with well-designed parameterized tests for string representation and bulk saving functionality. The test cases are comprehensive and follow pytest best practices.
backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_scrape_projects_test.py (1)
30-107: Well-structured parameterized test for command handlingThe test provides comprehensive coverage of the command functionality with good mocking of external dependencies and thorough verification of expected behavior.
backend/tests/app/common/management/commands/add_project_custom_tags_test.py (1)
1-109: LGTM - Well-designed test file with good error handling coverageThis test file is well-structured with comprehensive parameterized tests that cover various scenarios including error conditions (file not found, empty file, non-existent project) and successful tag addition. The use of MockProject class is an elegant approach to simulate the behavior of the Project model.
backend/tests/app/common/management/commands/purge_data_test.py (1)
1-49: LGTM - Well-structured parameterized test for data purge commandThe test is well-designed with good use of parameterization and mocking to verify the command's behavior across different apps and models.
backend/tests/app/owasp/models/project_test.py (1)
1-133: Good implementation of test cases for the Project model!The test suite provides comprehensive coverage of the Project model's functionality with well-structured parametrized tests for various methods including
get_related_url, string representation, type checking methods, and model operations likedeactivateandupdate_data. The mocking strategy is effective for testing integration with GitHub repository data.backend/tests/app/github/models/repository_test.py (3)
11-27: The repository update_data test looks goodThis test effectively validates that the Repository.update_data method correctly updates the node_id and calls from_github once.
49-59: Good test for missing funding YAML scenarioThe test correctly validates repository behavior when funding YAML is missing by simulating a 404 GitHub exception.
60-70: Good test for funding YAML presenceThe test properly validates the repository behavior when funding YAML exists by mocking the get_contents response.
backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_scrape_chapters_test.py (1)
28-92: Well-structured comprehensive test for the command handlerThe test_handle method effectively tests the Command.handle method with various combinations of offsets and chapter counts. It properly mocks all external dependencies and validates expected behaviors including:
- Proper URL verification
- Bulk saving of chapters
- Progress reporting via print statements
- Correct population of invalid_urls and related_urls lists
The parameterization approach allows testing multiple scenarios efficiently.
backend/tests/app/github/models/label_test.py (3)
7-11: Good test for bulk_save functionalityThis test effectively verifies that Label.bulk_save correctly delegates to BulkSaveModel.bulk_save with the right parameters.
13-27: The label update_data test looks goodThis test effectively validates that the Label.update_data method correctly updates the node_id and calls from_github once.
29-40: Good test for from_github functionalityThe test properly verifies that the Label's from_github method correctly sets all required properties from the GitHub label data.
backend/tests/app/github/management/commands/github_update_project_related_repositories_test.py (5)
26-34: Good parameterization of test cases.The parametrization covers a good range of offset and project count combinations, which helps ensure the command works correctly with different pagination scenarios.
45-53: Well-structured test function with clear parameter organization.The test function's signature clearly organizes the parameters, with mocks first, fixtures next, and parameterized values last, making it easier to understand the function's dependencies.
66-76: Well-implemented mock for the projects list.The mock implementation for the active projects list is thorough, handling iteration, count, and indexing operations to properly simulate real object behavior.
78-82: Good use of context managers for patching.The use of a context manager with multiple patches ensures all mocks are properly applied and cleaned up after the test.
93-93: Effective verification of call count based on parameters.The assertion checks that the sync_repository function is called the correct number of times based on the offset and project count parameters, which is important for validating the pagination logic.
backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_update_project_health_requirements_test.py (6)
14-23: Good test setup with clear documentation.The
_setupfixture is well documented and properly sets up the test environment with the necessary mocks. The use ofautouse=Trueensures the setup is automatically applied to all tests in the class.
25-40: Well-structured parameterization for testing different project levels.The parameterization covers different project levels, including the default case when level is None, and verifies both the output and display name for each case.
41-53: Comprehensive test for successful creation scenarios.The test handles both specified and default levels, capturing and verifying the command output in each case. The assertions effectively verify the expected behavior.
55-63: Good exception handling test.The test properly verifies that exceptions during the update process are correctly propagated as CommandError with the right error message.
65-74: Complete coverage of project level cases.The parameterization includes all possible project levels, ensuring comprehensive coverage of the command's behavior for different types of projects.
75-96: Thorough verification of requirements dictionary structure.The test verifies that all expected keys are present in the requirements dictionary for each project level, and confirms that the values match the predefined defaults in the command.
backend/tests/app/owasp/models/project_health_requirements_test.py (6)
8-10: Good class documentation.The class-level docstring clearly explains the purpose of the test class, focusing on model validation and behavior.
11-30: Well-organized constants for test data.The class defines constants for valid levels, invalid levels, and positive integer fields, making the tests more maintainable and easier to understand.
32-44: Comprehensive testing of string representation.The parameterized test covers all project levels and an empty string, ensuring that the string representation works correctly in all cases.
46-48: Efficient testing of default values.The parameterized test checks that all positive integer fields default to zero, avoiding duplicate test code.
50-54: Good validation testing for valid levels.The test ensures that valid project levels can be assigned without raising validation errors, covering all possible valid values.
55-60: Comprehensive testing of invalid level handling.The test verifies that both a string that doesn't match any valid level and None value trigger a ValidationError, and confirms that the error dictionary contains an entry for "level".
backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_enrich_chapters_test.py (5)
27-35: Good parameterization with geographical coordinates.The test parameters include not only offset and chapter counts but also latitude and longitude values, providing comprehensive test coverage for location-based functionality.
44-52: Clever use of side effects for attribute setting.The side_effect lambda functions efficiently set attributes on the mock chapter object during test execution, simulating the behavior of the actual methods.
54-64: Well-implemented mock for the chapters list.The mock implementation properly handles iteration, counting, and indexing operations for both integer indices and slices, simulating real object behavior.
66-73: Good use of context managers for multiple patches.The test uses a context manager with multiple patches to control the environment during test execution, ensuring all mocks are properly applied and cleaned up.
86-90: Thorough verification of chapter attributes.The test verifies that each chapter in the list has been updated with the expected values for summary, suggested location, and geographical coordinates, ensuring the command processed all chapters correctly.
backend/tests/app/owasp/graphql/queries/chapter_test.py (4)
15-18: Test correctly verifies ChapterQuery inheritance.The test properly validates that ChapterQuery inherits from BaseQuery, which is a good practice for ensuring the inheritance hierarchy is maintained.
19-28: Well-structured field configuration test.This test thoroughly validates the structure of the GraphQL field, including its type and argument configuration. The assertions are comprehensive and verify both the field type and the required arguments.
44-52: Good mocking practices for testing existing chapter resolution.The test effectively uses patching to mock database operations and verifies both the correct result and that the model method was called with the expected parameters.
54-62: Effective error case testing.The test properly verifies the behavior when a chapter doesn't exist, ensuring the resolver gracefully returns None instead of propagating an exception.
backend/tests/app/common/models_test.py (2)
26-34: Good test coverage for bulk_save with specified fields.The test effectively verifies that the bulk_save method correctly separates objects for creation and update, and that the appropriate bulk operations are called exactly once.
36-42: Good test coverage for default fields scenario.The test ensures that bulk_save works correctly when no fields are specified, which is an important edge case to verify.
backend/tests/app/core/api/algolia_test.py (3)
31-80: Well-structured parameterized test for valid Algolia search scenarios.This parameterized test effectively covers multiple valid search scenarios with different indices and parameters. The mocking approach and assertions are thorough.
81-91: Good error handling test for invalid HTTP method.This test properly verifies that the function rejects non-POST methods with the appropriate status code and error message.
92-140: Comprehensive test coverage for invalid request parameters.The parameterized test effectively covers various validation failure scenarios with appropriate error messages for each case.
backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_enrich_committees_test.py (5)
24-32: Good use of parameterization for comprehensive test coverage.The test uses parameterization effectively to test various combinations of arguments, which ensures thorough test coverage of the command's behavior.
33-44: Well-structured test setup with environment and method mocking.The test correctly sets up the required environment variables and mocks the necessary methods to isolate the command's behavior.
45-75: Thorough mock setup for testing committee processing.The test creates comprehensive mock structures to simulate committees with and without summaries, including the necessary methods and properties for testing the command's behavior.
76-92: Effective use of context manager for multiple patches.The test uses a context manager with multiple patches effectively to mock all the necessary components for testing the command.
94-112: Good verification of command behavior based on input parameters.The test thoroughly verifies that the command behaves correctly based on the input parameters, checking both the method calls and the effects on the committee objects.
backend/tests/app/github/api/user_test.py (1)
9-64: LGTM! Test structure and coverage look good.The test class provides good coverage for the
UserSerializerandUser.is_indexablefunctionality. Parameterized tests are used effectively to test multiple scenarios with minimal code duplication.backend/tests/app/common/index_test.py (4)
163-166: LGTM! Good error handling in _parse_synonyms_file_empty testThis test appropriately verifies that the function handles empty files, comments, and whitespace correctly.
168-195: LGTM! Good error handling in get_total_count_error testThis test thoroughly verifies the error handling behavior when Algolia throws an exception, ensuring the method gracefully returns 0 and logs the error.
197-207: LGTM! Good verification of caching behaviorThe test effectively verifies that the cache mechanism works correctly for
get_total_count, ensuring that repeated calls with the same parameters return consistent results and only make a single API call.
126-162: LGTM! Thorough parameterized testing of replica configurationThe parameterized test for
configure_replicascovers multiple important scenarios based on local build status and indexability.backend/tests/app/owasp/management/commands/owasp_enrich_projects_test.py (1)
92-110: LGTM! Good conditional assertion and verificationThe test does a good job of verifying different behaviors based on the input parameters, checking for both the method calls and the resulting summary values.
| @pytest.mark.parametrize( | ||
| ("data", "expected"), | ||
| [ | ||
| ( | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "Test Event", | ||
| "description": "A test event", | ||
| "url": "https://github.com/owasp/Nest", | ||
| }, | ||
| True, | ||
| ), | ||
| ( | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "biggest event", | ||
| "description": "this is a biggest event", | ||
| "url": "https://github.com/owasp", | ||
| }, | ||
| True, | ||
| ), | ||
| ], | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add negative test cases to verify validation behavior.
The test parameters only include valid cases where validation succeeds. To ensure robust testing, consider adding negative test cases with invalid data (e.g., missing required fields, malformed URLs, etc.) to verify that the serializer correctly rejects invalid inputs.
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
("data", "expected"),
[
(
{
"name": "Test Event",
"description": "A test event",
"url": "https://github.com/owasp/Nest",
},
True,
),
(
{
"name": "biggest event",
"description": "this is a biggest event",
"url": "https://github.com/owasp",
},
True,
),
+ (
+ {
+ "name": "",
+ "description": "A test event",
+ "url": "https://github.com/owasp/Nest",
+ },
+ False,
+ ),
+ (
+ {
+ "name": "Test Event",
+ "description": "A test event",
+ "url": "invalid-url",
+ },
+ False,
+ ),
+ (
+ {},
+ False,
+ ),
],
)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @pytest.mark.parametrize( | |
| ("data", "expected"), | |
| [ | |
| ( | |
| { | |
| "name": "Test Event", | |
| "description": "A test event", | |
| "url": "https://github.com/owasp/Nest", | |
| }, | |
| True, | |
| ), | |
| ( | |
| { | |
| "name": "biggest event", | |
| "description": "this is a biggest event", | |
| "url": "https://github.com/owasp", | |
| }, | |
| True, | |
| ), | |
| ], | |
| ) | |
| @pytest.mark.parametrize( | |
| ("data", "expected"), | |
| [ | |
| ( | |
| { | |
| "name": "Test Event", | |
| "description": "A test event", | |
| "url": "https://github.com/owasp/Nest", | |
| }, | |
| True, | |
| ), | |
| ( | |
| { | |
| "name": "biggest event", | |
| "description": "this is a biggest event", | |
| "url": "https://github.com/owasp", | |
| }, | |
| True, | |
| ), | |
| ( | |
| { | |
| "name": "", | |
| "description": "A test event", | |
| "url": "https://github.com/owasp/Nest", | |
| }, | |
| False, | |
| ), | |
| ( | |
| { | |
| "name": "Test Event", | |
| "description": "A test event", | |
| "url": "invalid-url", | |
| }, | |
| False, | |
| ), | |
| ( | |
| {}, | |
| False, | |
| ), | |
| ], | |
| ) |
| @pytest.mark.parametrize( | ||
| ("is_draft", "expected_indexable"), | ||
| [ | ||
| (False, True), | ||
| (True, False), | ||
| ], | ||
| ) | ||
| def test_is_indexable(self, is_draft, expected_indexable): | ||
| release = Release(is_draft=is_draft) | ||
| assert release.is_indexable == expected_indexable |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Test appears to be in the wrong test class
This test is validating the is_indexable property of the Release class, but it's located in the TestRepositoryIndexMixin class. This seems misplaced as it isn't testing the mixin itself.
Consider moving this test to a dedicated TestRelease class or clarify the relationship between Release and RepositoryIndexMixin with a comment if Release inherits from this mixin.
| { | ||
| "name": "Test Project", | ||
| "description": "A test project", | ||
| "created_at": "2024-11-01T00:00:00Z", | ||
| "updated_at": "2024-07-02T00:00:00Z", | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the test data inconsistency and date logic issue.
The test data appears to be for a Project rather than a Committee (references "Test Project" and "A test project"), suggesting this might be copied from a project test. Additionally, the dates have logical issues:
created_atis set to November 2024, which is a future dateupdated_atis set to July 2024, which is before the creation date
Apply this fix to make the test data consistent with a Committee entity and use logical dates:
{
- "name": "Test Project",
- "description": "A test project",
- "created_at": "2024-11-01T00:00:00Z",
- "updated_at": "2024-07-02T00:00:00Z",
+ "name": "Test Committee",
+ "description": "A test committee",
+ "created_at": "2023-07-02T00:00:00Z",
+ "updated_at": "2023-11-01T00:00:00Z",
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| { | |
| "name": "Test Project", | |
| "description": "A test project", | |
| "created_at": "2024-11-01T00:00:00Z", | |
| "updated_at": "2024-07-02T00:00:00Z", | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "name": "Test Committee", | |
| "description": "A test committee", | |
| "created_at": "2023-07-02T00:00:00Z", | |
| "updated_at": "2023-11-01T00:00:00Z", | |
| }, |
| from unittest.mock import patch | ||
|
|
||
| import pytest | ||
| from algoliasearch.http.exceptions import AlgoliaException |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Potential import path inconsistency
The code imports AlgoliaException from algoliasearch.http.exceptions, but according to the PR summary, there might be a change to import it from algoliasearch.https.exceptions. Please verify that the import path is consistent with the rest of the codebase.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for AlgoliaException import paths in the codebase
echo "Checking AlgoliaException import paths in the codebase..."
rg -A 1 "from algoliasearch" | rg -A 1 "AlgoliaException"Length of output: 1952
Action Required: Align Import Paths for AlgoliaException
The current file in backend/tests/app/common/management/commands/algolia_update_replicas_test.py imports AlgoliaException from algoliasearch.http.exceptions, while production code (e.g., in backend/apps/common/index.py) now uses algoliasearch.https.exceptions. This inconsistency might lead to unexpected behavior under the new PR changes. Please update the test file (and any similar test files) to use the new import path (algoliasearch.https.exceptions) to ensure consistency across the codebase.
- File(s) to update:
backend/tests/app/common/management/commands/algolia_update_replicas_test.py- (Verify if similar updates are needed for other test files importing from
algoliasearch.http.exceptions)
| (VALID_SCORE, True), | ||
| (MAX_SCORE, True), | ||
| (MIN_SCORE, True), | ||
| (MAX_SCORE + 0.1, False), | ||
| (MIN_SCORE - 10.0, False), | ||
| (None, False), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Missing self reference for class constants
The class constants are referenced without the 'self' prefix which may lead to unexpected behavior. Class constants should be accessed via self to ensure the correct values are used.
- (VALID_SCORE, True),
- (MAX_SCORE, True),
- (MIN_SCORE, True),
- (MAX_SCORE + 0.1, False),
- (MIN_SCORE - 10.0, False),
+ (self.VALID_SCORE, True),
+ (self.MAX_SCORE, True),
+ (self.MIN_SCORE, True),
+ (self.MAX_SCORE + 0.1, False),
+ (self.MIN_SCORE - 10.0, False),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| (VALID_SCORE, True), | |
| (MAX_SCORE, True), | |
| (MIN_SCORE, True), | |
| (MAX_SCORE + 0.1, False), | |
| (MIN_SCORE - 10.0, False), | |
| (None, False), | |
| (self.VALID_SCORE, True), | |
| (self.MAX_SCORE, True), | |
| (self.MIN_SCORE, True), | |
| (self.MAX_SCORE + 0.1, False), | |
| (self.MIN_SCORE - 10.0, False), | |
| (None, False), |
| for model_name in mock_models[app_name]: | ||
| table_name = f"{app_name.lower()}_{model_name.lower()}" | ||
| cursor_instance.execute.assert_any_call(f"TRUNCATE TABLE {table_name} CASCADE") | ||
| mock_print.assert_any_call(f"Purged GitHub {model_name}s") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix hardcoded app name in print assertion
The assertion uses hardcoded "GitHub" instead of using the variable app_name, which will cause the test to fail for non-GitHub app models.
- mock_print.assert_any_call(f"Purged GitHub {model_name}s")
+ mock_print.assert_any_call(f"Purged {app_name.capitalize()} {model_name}s")📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| mock_print.assert_any_call(f"Purged GitHub {model_name}s") | |
| mock_print.assert_any_call(f"Purged {app_name.capitalize()} {model_name}s") |
| "nbPages": 5, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| CLIENT_IP_ADDRESS = "127.0.0.1" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace hardcoded IP address with a constant or configuration variable.
This hardcoded IP address should be replaced with a configurable value or constant, aligning with the PR's objective to eliminate hardcoded IP addresses.
Consider defining this in a test configuration or using an environment variable to align with the PR's objective of removing hardcoded IPs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docker/docker-compose-local.yaml (1)
22-24: Update Environment Variables and DocumentationThe new environment variables (
PUBLIC_DNS_IP,PUBLIC_IP_ADDRESS, andREMOTE_IP_ADDRESS) correctly replace the previously hardcoded IP addresses to enhance configuration management. Please ensure that these variables are also included in the project documentation (e.g., in the README or configuration documentation) with a note that no default values are provided, so that users are aware of the required configuration.Additionally, there is a trailing space at the end of line 23, which triggers a YAML lint warning. Removing the trailing space will help adhere to quality standards.
- PUBLIC_IP_ADDRESS: ${PUBLIC_IP_ADDRESS} + PUBLIC_IP_ADDRESS: ${PUBLIC_IP_ADDRESS}🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
[error] 23-23: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docker/docker-compose-local.yaml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
docker/docker-compose-local.yaml
[error] 23-23: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
|
|
Beyond the deadline |
@arkid15r I understand the PR was closed due to the deadline—apologies for the delay! I’ve since resolved all the issues you flagged:
The app now runs locally without errors using |
|
It was closed based on #1169 (review) and the deadline date. |
Alright thank you, |
Resolves #1144
Description
This PR resolves #1144 by removing hardcoded IPs from test/app, and reducing test code duplication, enhancing PR #1138 "Add missing apps directory for backend tests"