Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Have a github action to compare git-secrets and trufflehog without any configuration update #424

Open
1 of 15 tasks
commjoen opened this issue Sep 22, 2022 · 3 comments
Open
1 of 15 tasks
Labels
hacktoberfest help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@commjoen
Copy link
Collaborator

commjoen commented Sep 22, 2022

Create a multistage pipelien in which we check the performance of

for their detection out of the box.

@commjoen commjoen added help wanted Extra attention is needed Hacktoberfest labels Oct 5, 2022
@commjoen commjoen self-assigned this Nov 29, 2022
@commjoen commjoen changed the title HAve a github action to compare git-secrets and trufflehog without any configuration update Have a github action to compare git-secrets and trufflehog without any configuration update Nov 29, 2022
@commjoen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

commjoen commented Dec 5, 2022

There is no action yet for git-secrets: see awslabs/git-secrets#214

@swanasingh
Copy link

Hello @commjoen is this issue to create multistage pipelien in which we check the performance of all the security tools integrated or to have a github action to compare git-secrets and trufflehog ?

@commjoen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

yes @swanasingh and also the other tools listed in the issue :) , but indeed. the idea would be to create a multi stage pipeline that run on this project which then counts the number of found secrets and compares this per tool as the output like a "performance benchmark"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hacktoberfest help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
Status: To do
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants