You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi. First I just discovered and tested your tool a few days ago. If my request has no sense or linked to something I didn't understand well, feel free to remove my message.
I would like to filter reads of FASTQ files to keep only very high quality sequences : reads where ALL bases are above Q30 by example. Two filter options seem to be appropriate :
-q QUALIFIED_QUALITY_PHRED --> set to "-q 30"
-u UNQUALIFIED_BASE_LIMIT --> would be logic to set "-u 0" to be sure to remove all reads where at least one base is under Q30. But sadly if you set "-u 0" in fact by default it do not filter reads by low quality base count at all (see -u UNQUALIFIED_BASE_LIMIT info). So I guess it is impossible to filter "perfect quality reads" (reads with no bases lower a specific quality). Default option to deactivate UNQUALIFIED_BASE_LIMIT should not be something other than 0?
Thanks a lot,
Max
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
-u UNQUALIFIED_BASE_LIMIT, --unqualified_base_limit=UNQUALIFIED_BASE_LIMIT
if exists more than unqualified_base_limit bases that
quality is lower than qualified quality, then this
read/pair is bad. Default 0 means do not filter reads
by low quality base count
So 0 will actually disable the unqualified_base filtering.
Hi. First I just discovered and tested your tool a few days ago. If my request has no sense or linked to something I didn't understand well, feel free to remove my message.
I would like to filter reads of FASTQ files to keep only very high quality sequences : reads where ALL bases are above Q30 by example. Two filter options seem to be appropriate :
-q QUALIFIED_QUALITY_PHRED --> set to "-q 30"
-u UNQUALIFIED_BASE_LIMIT --> would be logic to set "-u 0" to be sure to remove all reads where at least one base is under Q30. But sadly if you set "-u 0" in fact by default it do not filter reads by low quality base count at all (see -u UNQUALIFIED_BASE_LIMIT info). So I guess it is impossible to filter "perfect quality reads" (reads with no bases lower a specific quality). Default option to deactivate UNQUALIFIED_BASE_LIMIT should not be something other than 0?
Thanks a lot,
Max
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: