You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Introduce the log_prio option to expand priority logging from just a
single bit information (priority high vs low) to the full value of the
priority value used to execute IOs. When this option is set, the
priority value is printed as a 16-bits hexadecimal value combining
the I/O priority class and priority level as defined by the
ioprio_value() helper.
Similarly to the log_offset option, this option does not result in
actual I/O priority logging when log_avg_msec is set.
This patch also fixes a problem with the IO_U_F_PRIORITY flag, namely
that this flag is used to indicate that the IO is being executed with a
high priority on the device while at the same time indicating how to
account for the IO completion latency (high_prio clat vs low_prio clat).
With the introduction of the cmdprio_class and cmdprio options, these
assumptions are not necesarilly compatible anymore.
These problems are addressed as follows:
* The priority_bit field of struct iosample is replaced with the
16-bits priority field representing the full io_u->ioprio value. When
log_prio is set, the priority field value is logged as is. When
log_prio is not set, 1 is logged as the entry's priority field if the
sample priority class is IOPRIO_CLASS_RT, and 0 otherwise.
* IO_U_F_PRIORITY is renamed to IO_U_F_HIGH_PRIO to indicate that a job
IO has the highest priority within the job context and so must be
accounted as such using high_prio clat.
While fio final statistics only show accounting of high vs low IO
completion latency statistics, the log_prio option allows a user to
perform more detailed statistical analysis of a workload using
multiple different IO priorities.
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
0 commit comments