You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Part of #83; depends on #118; feeds the P1 full-integration effort
Produce the "RL-Kernel to vime integration" design doc. The goal is to define a non-intrusive integration path and positioning statement before any broad implementation work starts.
Non-intrusive activation path: custom op / optional backend / config flag shape, with pure vime inference and native RL paths unaffected when disabled.
Change-surface estimate: what can live entirely in RL-Kernel, what requires vime/slime adapter code, and what would need upstream vLLM/vllm-router changes.
Positioning statement: RL-Kernel provides operator-level consistency beneath vime's framework-level alignment; complementary rather than competing.
Risk and fallback section: private API reliance, version pinning, missing extension points, unsupported hardware, and how the PoC should fail safely.
Non-goals: no production integration, no vime upstream PR, and no claim that this closes real-engine train-inference consistency. WS5 scopes the path; WS3/P1 own the full real-engine integration.
Start after the hook-point inventory in #118 is usable.
Part of #83; depends on #118; feeds the P1 full-integration effort
Produce the "RL-Kernel to vime integration" design doc. The goal is to define a non-intrusive integration path and positioning statement before any broad implementation work starts.
Planned:
Non-goals: no production integration, no vime upstream PR, and no claim that this closes real-engine train-inference consistency. WS5 scopes the path; WS3/P1 own the full real-engine integration.
Start after the hook-point inventory in #118 is usable.