Dear RSNA-ICA dataset maintainers,
Thank you for making the RSNA Intracranial Aneurysm Detection dataset available to the research community.
We are preparing a non-commercial academic research resource based on the MRA subset of the RSNA Intracranial Aneurysm Detection dataset. Our plan is to release additional derived vessel segmentation annotations, metadata, split files, and baseline/evaluation code. If permitted, we would also like to redistribute the corresponding MRA images together with these derived annotations, while preserving the upstream RSNA-ICA terms.
We would like to clarify two practical points before finalizing our release.
-
If we strictly follow the RSNA-ICA upstream terms, including non-commercial research/education use only, are we allowed to redistribute the corresponding MRA images together with our additional derived annotations?
We will also strictly follow the stated restriction: “Not to make any attempt to identify or contact any individual(s) who may be the subjects of the data.”
-
The AWS Registry page states that any sharing or redistribution should include the RSNA-ICA Dataset, July 2025 citation and DOI: https://registry.opendata.aws/rsna-intracranial-aneurysm-detection-dataset/
However, the DOI link on the AWS page appears to lead to a DOI Not Found page, whether or not the trailing bracket is included. Should we still cite the DOI exactly as written on the AWS Registry page, or is there an updated DOI/citation text that you recommend?
Thank you again for providing this dataset. We want to make sure that our derived annotation releaseis fully aligned with the upstream RSNA-ICA terms.
Dear RSNA-ICA dataset maintainers,
Thank you for making the RSNA Intracranial Aneurysm Detection dataset available to the research community.
We are preparing a non-commercial academic research resource based on the MRA subset of the RSNA Intracranial Aneurysm Detection dataset. Our plan is to release additional derived vessel segmentation annotations, metadata, split files, and baseline/evaluation code. If permitted, we would also like to redistribute the corresponding MRA images together with these derived annotations, while preserving the upstream RSNA-ICA terms.
We would like to clarify two practical points before finalizing our release.
If we strictly follow the RSNA-ICA upstream terms, including non-commercial research/education use only, are we allowed to redistribute the corresponding MRA images together with our additional derived annotations?
We will also strictly follow the stated restriction: “Not to make any attempt to identify or contact any individual(s) who may be the subjects of the data.”
The AWS Registry page states that any sharing or redistribution should include the RSNA-ICA Dataset, July 2025 citation and DOI: https://registry.opendata.aws/rsna-intracranial-aneurysm-detection-dataset/
However, the DOI link on the AWS page appears to lead to a DOI Not Found page, whether or not the trailing bracket is included. Should we still cite the DOI exactly as written on the AWS Registry page, or is there an updated DOI/citation text that you recommend?
Thank you again for providing this dataset. We want to make sure that our derived annotation releaseis fully aligned with the upstream RSNA-ICA terms.