You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
bytemuck allows safe transmuting of simple types with no uninhabited values. I would be really useful if hybrid-array implemented it the same way bytemuck implements it on native constant-sized arrays. Obviously, the dependency would be optional.
How ?
This is the impl for the standard generic array, it should be trivial to adapt:
Implementing it would instantly make hybrid arrays of int/bytes/etc. safely transmutable with other kinds of arrays at no cost, including non-standard ones
Why not ?
It adds a dependency
It's always possible to get access to the underlying &[T; N]/&mut [T; N] (and vice-versa) using normal hybrid_array::Array methods and give these to bytemuck instead. It adds one "level" of conversion, which is acceptable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
bytemuck
allows safe transmuting of simple types with no uninhabited values. I would be really useful ifhybrid-array
implemented it the same waybytemuck
implements it on native constant-sized arrays. Obviously, the dependency would be optional.How ?
This is the impl for the standard generic array, it should be trivial to adapt:
source: https://github.com/Lokathor/bytemuck/blob/005ee3254fdfa63d67d024cfc598319331dab0cb/src/pod.rs#L87
Why ?
bytemuck
is quite popular (3.5M downloads/month, 600+ GH stars)Why not ?
&[T; N]
/&mut [T; N]
(and vice-versa) using normalhybrid_array::Array
methods and give these tobytemuck
instead. It adds one "level" of conversion, which is acceptable.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: