New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should our handling of STASH objects be rationalised? #6286

Open

ESadek-MO opened this issue Jan 15, 2025 · 1 comment

Contributor

ESadek-MO commented Jan 15, 2025

Fallout from #6239.

Do we need STASH attributes encoded as an object?
Should we encode them as a string?
Can we rationalise this across GRIB_PARAM as well?

scitools-ci bot added this to 🚴 Peloton

Member

rcomer commented Jan 15, 2025

I think when Iris first appeared a lot of scientists were confused/surprised that the stash code wasn't just an int, as used in the pp-header.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment