Skip to content

chore(specs): set real RTX PRO 6000 all-in power and cost tiers / 设置 RTX PRO 6000 的正式整机功耗与成本档位 - #627

Merged
functionstackx merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
chore/rtx6000pro-power-cost-values
Jul 27, 2026
Merged

chore(specs): set real RTX PRO 6000 all-in power and cost tiers / 设置 RTX PRO 6000 的正式整机功耗与成本档位#627
functionstackx merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
chore/rtx6000pro-power-cost-values

Conversation

@functionstackx

@functionstackx functionstackx commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Replaces the 9.99 placeholder values for the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition in HW_REGISTRY (packages/constants/src/gpu-keys.ts) with the official values from the SemiAnalysis AI Cloud TCO model:

Field Meaning Old New
power All-in kW per GPU 9.99 0.975
costh Owning – Hyperscaler ($/GPU/hr) 9.99 0.43
costn Owning – Neocloud Giant ($/GPU/hr) 9.99 0.676
costr 3 Year Rental ($/GPU/hr) 9.99 0.52

With real numbers in place, $/token and per-MW metrics for this SKU are now meaningful, so the placeholder TODO comment is removed. TDP stays at the datasheet 600 W max board power.

No presentation/UI code changes — HW_REGISTRY is the single source of truth and all cost/power metrics derive from it at render time, for both official runs and ?unofficialrun= overlays (the overlay path reads the same registry, so no separate overlay work applies).

Testing

  • pnpm typecheck, pnpm lint, pnpm fmt — pass
  • pnpm test:unit — 2810 tests pass (no test pinned the placeholder values)

中文说明

HW_REGISTRYpackages/constants/src/gpu-keys.ts)中 NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition 的 9.99 占位值替换为 SemiAnalysis AI Cloud TCO 模型的正式数值:

字段 含义 旧值 新值
power 每 GPU 整机功耗 (kW) 9.99 0.975
costh 自有 – Hyperscaler ($/GPU/hr) 9.99 0.43
costn 自有 – Neocloud Giant ($/GPU/hr) 9.99 0.676
costr 3 年租赁 ($/GPU/hr) 9.99 0.52

正式数值就位后,该 SKU 的 $/token 与每 MW 指标随之有效,因此移除了占位 TODO 注释。TDP 保持数据手册标称的 600 W 最大板卡功耗。

不涉及展示层/UI 代码改动 —— HW_REGISTRY 是唯一数据源,所有成本/功耗指标(包括官方运行与 ?unofficialrun= 覆盖层)都在渲染时从同一注册表推导,无需单独的覆盖层适配。

测试:pnpm typecheckpnpm lintpnpm fmt 通过;pnpm test:unit 2810 个测试全部通过(无测试固定占位值)。

🤖 Generated with Claude Code


Note

Low Risk
Single-registry data update with no logic changes; only RTX PRO 6000 derived metrics change.

Overview
Updates rtx6000pro in HW_REGISTRY so RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell metrics use SemiAnalysis AI Cloud TCO values instead of 9.99 placeholders.

power is now 0.975 kW/GPU (all-in); costh, costn, and costr are 0.43, 0.676, and 0.52 $/GPU/hr respectively. tdp stays 600 W. The TODO about pending TCO numbers is removed and the block comment now states that power and costs come from the TCO model.

Because everything that derives $/token and per-MW figures reads this registry, RTX PRO 6000 comparisons and overlays pick up the new economics without separate UI changes.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit ca59df2. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Replace the 9.99 placeholders in HW_REGISTRY with the official values
from the SemiAnalysis AI Cloud TCO model:

- All-in power: 0.975 kW/GPU
- Owning - Hyperscaler (costh): $0.43/GPU/hr
- Owning - Neocloud Giant (costn): $0.676/GPU/hr
- 3 Year Rental (costr): $0.52/GPU/hr

$/token and per-MW metrics for this SKU are now meaningful.

中文:将 HW_REGISTRY 中 RTX PRO 6000 的 9.99 占位值替换为 SemiAnalysis
AI Cloud TCO 模型的正式数值:整机功耗 0.975 kW/GPU;自有 - Hyperscaler
$0.43/GPU/hr;自有 - Neocloud Giant $0.676/GPU/hr;3 年租赁 $0.52/GPU/hr。
该 SKU 的 $/token 与每 MW 指标自此有效。

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@functionstackx
functionstackx requested a review from adibarra as a code owner July 27, 2026 02:17
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
inferencemax-app Building Building Preview, Comment Jul 27, 2026 2:17am

Request Review

@functionstackx
functionstackx merged commit 6d298ec into master Jul 27, 2026
22 of 23 checks passed
@functionstackx
functionstackx deleted the chore/rtx6000pro-power-cost-values branch July 27, 2026 02:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant