Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Design improvements #17

Open
phlind opened this issue Nov 2, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Design improvements #17

phlind opened this issue Nov 2, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@phlind
Copy link

phlind commented Nov 2, 2021

I would propose to make the plugin look less cluttered by moving the algorithm setting and the "zero" and "infinity" checkboxes into the settings panel. One has to really make the sidebar big, in order not to spread the settings across several lines.

Also, in the link predictions panel the table header should not be shown when there's no note
Bildschirmfoto 2021-11-02 um 13 49 32
.

@SkepticMystic
Copy link
Owner

What do you mean into the settings panel? The plugin settings? I feel that's quite an inconvenience if you want to quickly change algs. Maybe there is a better middle ground.

And yes, I agree that the table header should be hidden if there are no notes

@SkepticMystic
Copy link
Owner

@phlind You'll see I've slimmed down the AnalysisView a bit. Let me know your thoughts

@SkepticMystic
Copy link
Owner

@phlind lots of new changes to the ui in 0.6.4! Let us know what you think

@phlind
Copy link
Author

phlind commented Nov 15, 2021

Yes, I see many changes going on in the last two weeks, and I really like it, especially the scrolling mode. ❤️

Maybe one improvement that could be made is to make the font size the same as the file explorer. I just checked with the default theme and no snippets. Here the font looks bigger than the actual note text:

Bildschirmfoto 2021-11-15 um 08 18 16

Of course that's very easy to achive via CSS by every user, but maybe one could make it default?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants