You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.00139 suggests that the "Chambolle-Pock.... can take the stepsize of the dual iteration up to 4/3 of the previously proven one." and that " The condition for Chambolle-Pock is also proved to be optimal and can not be relaxed"
We should look at our convergence test for PDHG and if we need to update it for this bound and look at our defaults for the step sizes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
This paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.00139 suggests that the "Chambolle-Pock.... can take the stepsize of the dual iteration up to 4/3 of the previously proven one." and that " The condition for Chambolle-Pock is also proved to be optimal and can not be relaxed"
We should look at our convergence test for PDHG and if we need to update it for this bound and look at our defaults for the step sizes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: