Skip to content

AdvancedVI 0.3 and compatibility with Turing.jl #2430

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
mhauru opened this issue Dec 5, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #2506
Open

AdvancedVI 0.3 and compatibility with Turing.jl #2430

mhauru opened this issue Dec 5, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #2506
Assignees
@yebai @Red-Portal
Labels
roadmap Turing.jl meta issues
Milestone
Turing v1.0.0

Comments

@mhauru
Copy link
Member

mhauru commented Dec 5, 2024 •
edited by yebai
Loading

The new DynamicPPL.LogDensityFunction interface paves the way for this...
@mhauru mhauru added this to the Turing v1.0.0 milestone Dec 5, 2024
@mhauru mhauru mentioned this issue Dec 5, 2024
Open
15 tasks
@penelopeysm penelopeysm added the roadmap Turing.jl meta issues label Dec 7, 2024
@Red-Portal
Copy link
Member

Red-Portal commented Mar 16, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Hi all! I added a PR for this: #2506 , which is already functional. Things weren't as a big deal as I was worried. What remains is to converge to an interface for exposing the features of AdvancedVI, and this will also involve deciding how much breaking changes we are willing to allow.

@yebai yebai linked a pull request Apr 21, 2025 that will close this issue
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@yebai yebai

@Red-Portal Red-Portal

Labels
roadmap Turing.jl meta issues
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Turing v1.0.0
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Update to the [email protected] interface TuringLang/Turing.jl
4 participants
@yebai @mhauru @Red-Portal @penelopeysm