Skip to content

[Feat]: Preproduction QA Validation of UCP Implementations #142

@RyanLamanskyInsite

Description

@RyanLamanskyInsite

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
No documented strategy for pre-production QA validation, or at least it's not apparent on the site.

Describe the solution you'd like
The documentation basically says if you do everything right, it will work, but it implies that a real site with real products and real payments are all required.

We need an officially documented way to connect a real agent to a pre-production site to get the "all-clear" for production deployment.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Internet research suggests that testing must be done with a tool like Postman and validated manually by cross-checking results with the official spec. This could lead to both false positives and false negatives if the spec is misunderstood by either the original developer or QA personnel.

Additional context
My company's production deployment process has rigorous QA steps and I need to make sure UCP is testable.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions