reference_integrity_audit.md

全书引用完整性与真实性审计报告

• 生成时间：2026-06-08T09:33:04.674275+00:00
• 范围：当前 Springer 中文交付稿 docs/zh 中的正文章、项目章和附录。
• 扫描文件：70
• 参考文献条目：901
• 正文 author-year 引用：1091
• 正文引用未在同章参考文献解析到：50
• 章末参考文献未被同章正文引用：358
• 同章疑似重复参考文献组：1

外部核验概览

状态	数量	含义
check-error	54	外部服务请求失败
metadata-mismatch	9	外部记录存在，但题名或年份弱匹配/不一致
needs-manual-review	604	缺少可机器核验标识
not-found	1	外部元数据未查到
url-problem	5	URL 不可访问或状态异常
url-reachable	45	URL 可访问，但非论文元数据强校验
verified	183	arXiv / DOI / Crossref / OpenAlex 强匹配

主要结论

• 需要优先人工复核的外部核验问题：15 条。
• 缺少 DOI / arXiv / URL 的条目：604 条；其中一部分可由 Crossref/OpenAlex 题名检索确认，但 Springer 终稿仍建议补 DOI 或稳定 URL。
• url-reachable 只能证明网页当前可达，不能证明引文格式、版本日期和题名完全符合出版社要求。
• 当前报告只确认“同章 author-year 可解析对应关系”；对于一段话是否应该引用更精确来源，仍需人工学术编辑判断。

正文引用未解析到同章参考文献

文件	行	引用	上下文
docs/zh/part13/ch45_posttrain_recipes.md	87	Dubey et al. 2024)	* Llama-3 (Dubey et al. 2024) 代表了重资产工业路线。其报告披露了多轮后训练、偏好标注、奖励模型重训和拒绝采样等关键机制，但很多数据细节并未完整开放，因此更适合作为理解工业闭环的参照，而不是直接复刻的对象。
docs/zh/part13/ch45_posttrain_recipes.md	100	Wang et al. 2022)	Self-Instruct (Wang et al. 2022) 是指令合成的代表性方法之一。它依赖少量人工编写的种子任务（Seed Tasks）作为启动点，通常是数百个样例。流程中，强模型会参考这些种子，泛化生成新的 instruction、input 和 output，也就是指令、输入上下文和预期输出。
docs/zh/part13/ch45_posttrain_recipes.md	107	Xu et al. 2023)	为了解决 Self-Instruct 难度不足的问题，WizardLM (Xu et al. 2023) 提出了 Evol-Instruct 路线。该路线的核心是将简单的指令通过特定的“进化规则”强制变难。常见的进化操作包括：加约束条件、增加推理深度、引入多条件分支、要求多步骤解答等。
docs/zh/part13/ch45_posttrain_recipes.md	159	Shao et al. 2024)	GRPO (Shao et al. 2024) 常用于处理长推理任务，它不再依赖全局的绝对 Reward 基线，而是强调同一 prompt 下的组内相对质量。
docs/zh/part13/ch45_posttrain_recipes.md	201	Lambert et al. 2024)	Tülu-3 (Lambert et al. 2024) 的 SFT 阶段并不追求无边界扩张的样本量。其 SFT-Mix 规模约 939K [D]，这一数字来自公开材料中披露的训练数据规模，使用时应与对应数据集卡或论文表格保持一致。
docs/zh/part13/ch45_posttrain_recipes.md	209	Zheng et al. 2023)	差异偏好的体现： chosen 和 rejected 的设计不应随机选取。Tülu-3 在构建数据时，强调避免一种危险倾向：不要把“表面更礼貌但事实更差”的回答选为 chosen。如果数据管线使用未经校准的 LLM-as-a-Judge，模型容易受到此类偏好误导（Length Bias & Sycophancy (Zheng et al. 2023)）。因此，高质量的 DPO 对需要在“事实正确性”上具有明确差异。
docs/zh/part13/ch45_posttrain_recipes.md	232	Dubey et al. 2024)	Llama-3 (Dubey et al. 2024) 的后训练代表了一类高投入工业路线。与 Tülu-3 更强调公开 recipe 的可复现性不同，Llama-3 报告强调多轮 RLHF 迭代。其关键不在于单个数据集，而在于偏好采集、奖励模型更新、拒绝采样和失败样本回流之间的工程流转机制。
docs/zh/part13/ch46_rl_reasoning_data.md	195	Meurer et al. 2017)	数学 verifier 通常包括答案提取、单位归一化、符号化比较和容差判断。对于 \frac{1}{2}、0.5、50% 这类等价答案，不能只做字符串比较。更稳妥的方式是使用 sympy (Meurer et al. 2017) 等符号工具做表达式化简。
docs/zh/part13/ch46_rl_reasoning_data.md	231	Hendrycks et al. 2021)	| source | 数据来源，如 GSM8K (Cobbe et al. 2021)、MATH (Hendrycks et al. 2021)、HumanEval (Chen et al. 2021)、自有题库 |
docs/zh/part13/ch46_rl_reasoning_data.md	294	Günther et al. 2025)	OpenThoughts-114K (Günther et al. 2025) 是开源社区中重要的推理数据集之一，Hugging Face 数据集卡显示其以 Apache-2.0 许可证发布，并提供 parquet 格式数据 [D]。它的价值在于提供了可下载、可检查、可用于训练的 Long-CoT 样本，使研究者能够复现实验并研究推理数据配方。
docs/zh/part13/ch47_vlm_data_recipes.md	13	Liu et al. 2024	2025 年春，某国内头部人工智能（AI）实验室的多模态团队经历了一次典型的“数据配方复现失败”。他们的出发点看起来较为充分：使用与 Qwen2.5-VL 相同规格的视觉编码器（InternViT-6B），接入同等参数规模的中文基座大语言模型（LLM），并严格按照 LLaVA-1.5 (Liu et al. 2024b) 的经典两阶段训练方案执行——Stage-1 用 LAION-CC-SBU 的 558K 图文对做视觉对齐预训练...
docs/zh/part3/ch09_recaptioning_ocr.md	40	Liu et al. 2023	这不仅会削弱模型的细节捕捉能力，还会引发逻辑对齐冲突。设想图片中主体是一只白猫，而爬取的短文本只提“白色背景”。当视觉编码器（Vision Encoder）抽取出猫的轮廓向量特征，而训练目标却要求它与“背景”对齐时，模型就会学习到错误对应关系，从而损害多模态基础理解层在 MME (Fu et al. 2023)、MMBench (Liu et al. 2023b) 等评测中的稳定性。
docs/zh/part3/ch09_recaptioning_ocr.md	114	Liu et al. 2023	在这个模块中，原本给人类阅读的连续文本，需要被转化为一套自带坐标信息的数据流标记结构。在高分图片的重写流水线上，架构师会在旁路（Side-car Workflow）调用 GroundingDINO (Liu et al. 2023c)、SAM (Segment Anything Model) (Kirillov et al. 2023) 等零样本或弱监督目标检测框架，提取图像中物体的精确像素或归一化坐标序列（例如：...
docs/zh/part3/ch11_cross_modal_alignment.md	106	Oord et al. 2017)	大语言模型的主干通常以离散 Token 序列为接口，因此图像、音频和视频特征需要通过 Placeholder Engineering 与量化机制进入训练流。当通过 VQ-VAE (van den Oord et al. 2017) 或离散 Auto-Encoder 抽取特征后，连续的视觉或声学张量可以被表示为离散编号，例如将图像块映射为 <IMG_TK_451>。
docs/zh/part4/ch12_sft.md	119	Standards and Technology 2023)	系统任务层，则是很多团队最容易忽视但最重要的一层。这一层不面向业务内容，而面向系统行为本身，例如遵守安全策略、识别越权请求、执行拒答模板、根据开发者设定保持语气、优先服从system指令、控制工具调用格式、处理上下文冲突等。类似的系统行为约束，在 Model Spec、Constitutional AI 与 AI 风险管理框架中都被作为模型治理与安全对齐的重要组成部分讨论。(Bai et al. 2022; National In...
docs/zh/part4/ch12_sft.md	598	Standards and Technology 2023)	当SFT进入行业场景时，真正的难点不在于“换一批领域文本”，而在于指令体系本身必须随着行业责任结构而变化。NIST AI RMF 将 AI 风险管理放在具体使用情境中讨论，强调开发和部署组织需要识别不同场景中的潜在影响与风险，这与行业 SFT 中“按责任结构设计指令体系”的思路一致。(National Institute of Standards and Technology 2023)不同场景对模型的要求，不仅体现在知识内容上，...
docs/zh/part7/ch21_rag_pipeline.md	59	Pesala and Abraham 2022	表格抽取与长上下文研究同样提示，结构位置、表头关系与上下文位置会显著影响后续信息利用效果（Smock, Pesala and Abraham 2022; Liu et al. 2024）。在大量未能实现预期业务价值的检索增强生成项目中，其数据预处理环节普遍存在范式缺陷。典型的做法是将海量异构文档直接导入解析脚本，在剥离全部版式特征后将其转化为纯文本流，继而依据硬编码的固定阈值（如 500 Tokens）进行机械式切片，最终输入至嵌...
docs/zh/part7/ch21_rag_pipeline.md	140	Raghavan and Schütze 2008	这一过程可以抽象为（Manning, Raghavan and Schütze 2008）：
docs/zh/part7/ch21_rag_pipeline.md	373	Yepes et al. 2024	固定长度切分是最常见的初始方案。例如，每 500 tokens 或 1000 tokens 切成一个片段，并设置一定 overlap。这种方式实现简单、吞吐高，也便于工程并行处理。但它最大的缺陷是忽视语义边界。一个规则条款、一个表格说明、一个操作步骤或一个案例分析，可能被切断在两个 chunk 中。模型拿到其中任意一半，都无法理解完整含义。更合理的方式是基于语义结构进行切分。对于制度文件，可以按章节、条款和子条款切分；对于产品手册...
docs/zh/part7/ch21_rag_pipeline.md	395	Douze and Jégou 2019	当采集、解析、清洗与切分环节被整合为端到端的数据流水线，系统面临的核心挑战便从单一算法的优化转向整体工程的稳定性。生产级检索增强生成系统必须在精度、成本、吞吐、鲁棒性与可治理性之间寻求动态平衡（Johnson, Douze and Jégou 2019）。计算资源消耗与处理效率是首要考量。鉴于复杂文档解析常涉及光学字符识别、版面分析及视觉模型推理等高开销操作，面对百万级文档规模时，必须设计批处理机制、并发调度策略、缓存复用逻辑及增...
docs/zh/part7/ch21_rag_pipeline.md	563	Raghavan and Schütze 2008	检索层评测关注系统是否找到了正确证据。这里的“正确证据”不是简单相关文本，而是能够支撑答案的内容。传统检索指标如 Recall@k、Precision@k、MRR 等仍然有价值，但在 RAG 场景中还不够（Manning, Raghavan and Schütze 2008）。因为一个片段可能与问题语义相关，却不足以回答问题。例如，用户问“试用期员工是否可以申请差旅补贴”，系统召回了“差旅补贴标准”，但没有召回“适用人群限制”，这...
docs/zh/part7/ch23_online_feedback_knowledge_update.md	237	Koren and Volinsky 2008	在工程实践中，可以把显式反馈视为“强信号”，把隐式反馈视为“弱信号”。强信号适合直接进入人工审核和失败样本库；弱信号适合用于发现异常趋势和筛选候选问题（Hu, Koren and Volinsky 2008; Joachims et al. 2017）。例如，如果某类问题的点踩率上升，这是强烈的失败信号；如果某类问题的平均追问轮数上升、引用点击率下降、转人工率上升，即使没有大量点踩，也说明系统可能出现了质量退化。
docs/zh/part7/ch23_online_feedback_knowledge_update.md	247	Kühl and Hirschl 2023	一个完整的事件 schema 至少应包含六类信息：用户与会话信息、查询信息、检索信息、生成信息、反馈信息和治理信息。用户与会话信息用于标识一次交互所属的上下文。它不一定需要保存用户真实身份，但应记录匿名用户 ID、会话 ID、租户、权限范围、语言、终端和时间戳等信息。对于企业系统，还需要记录用户所属组织、角色或权限组，以便判断某些答案是否存在越权召回。查询信息用于描述用户输入本身，包括原始 query、规范化 query、quer...
docs/zh/part7/ch23_online_feedback_knowledge_update.md	285	Kühl and Hirschl 2023	知识缺失通常由内容负责人、业务专家或知识库运营人员处理。他们需要判断是否补充文档、更新条款、增加 FAQ 或修订知识结构。检索缺陷通常由数据工程和检索工程团队处理，重点检查 chunk、索引、metadata、query rewrite 和 rerank。生成缺陷通常由模型应用团队处理，涉及 prompt、上下文格式、引用约束和生成策略。策略缺陷则需要产品、业务、合规和安全团队共同决定，因为它涉及系统是否应该回答、如何回答以及何时...
docs/zh/part7/ch23_online_feedback_knowledge_update.md	384	Kühl and Hirschl 2023	具体来看，版本治理的主要方法可以总结为版本冻结、灰度发布与快速回滚三种类型。版本冻结是指在某个时间点将知识库、索引、prompt、模型配置和评测集状态固定下来，形成可复现的发布版本。对于生产级 RAG 系统而言，版本不应只记录文档文件夹，而应记录完整依赖关系，包括原始文档版本、解析器版本、chunk 策略、embedding 模型、索引构建参数、rerank 模型、prompt 模板和权限规则。只有这样，团队才能在问题发生时准确复...
docs/zh/part7/ch23_online_feedback_knowledge_update.md	412	Tang and Xu 2020	如表23-9所示，在线反馈闭环中，最常用的一组核心指标包括在线成功率、人工接管率、纠错率和知识命中率。它们分别从用户结果、人工成本、错误暴露和知识覆盖四个角度衡量系统表现。指标的设计通常会注意避免只涉及单一平均值。在线实验和搜索系统评估通常强调同时观察成功率、用户行为、错误成本和长尾影响，因为单一指标的上升可能掩盖高风险子场景的退化（Kohavi, Tang and Xu 2020; Joachims et al. 2017）。
docs/zh/part7/ch23_online_feedback_knowledge_update.md	539	Tang and Xu 2020	高价值反馈样本通常具备以下特征：涉及高频问题、来自高风险场景、伴随强负反馈、包含用户纠错文本、触发人工接管、与近期知识更新相关，或者同类失败在短时间内集中出现。系统可以为每个反馈样本计算一个优先级分数，用于决定是否进入人工审核、知识更新队列或评测集扩展。对这类样本的筛选类似于主动学习和在线学习中的样本选择问题：系统应优先利用不确定性高、风险高、频次高或能够代表错误簇的样本，而不是平均处理所有日志（Settles 2009; Koh...
docs/zh/part8/ch24_dataops_flywheel_team.md	8	Humble and Kim 2018	本章将从四个层面展开。高绩效技术组织研究强调，交付频率、变更前置时间、恢复时间和失败率等指标背后，本质上是团队协作、反馈速度和持续改进能力（Forsgren, Humble and Kim 2018）。首先解释为什么传统数据团队结构在 LLM 项目中会出现断裂，并揭示新型组织形态的设计逻辑。其次，建立角色分工、接口协议与 RACI 职责矩阵，使团队能够明确"谁做什么、谁决策、谁审批"。第三，介绍 DataOps 飞轮的运转机制与周...
docs/zh/part8/ch24_dataops_flywheel_team.md	36	Kühl and Hirschl 2023	LLM 数据工程打破了这个假设。MLOps 研究通常把模型开发、数据管理、训练、部署、监控和反馈看作一个连续生命周期，而不是彼此孤立的阶段（Kreuzberger, Kühl and Hirschl 2023）。训练数据的需求来自多个变化快速的源头：算法团队的实验结果会改变数据配比需求，产品团队的版本迭代会引入新的数据类别，RLHF 阶段需要人类偏好标注，RAG 场景需要企业知识库的持续更新。数据不再是被动的"搬运对象"，而是主动...
docs/zh/part8/ch24_dataops_flywheel_team.md	316	Molesky and O'Reilly 2015	飞轮要持续转动，需要固定的时间节点来驱动。持续交付实践强调固定节奏、自动化验证和小批量变更，目的正是降低交付风险并提高反馈速度（Humble and Farley 2010; Humble, Molesky and O'Reilly 2015）。以下是一套适合中等规模 LLM 数据团队（10-30 人）的周度节奏设计：
docs/zh/part8/ch24_dataops_flywheel_team.md	787	Molesky and O'Reilly 2015	最后，通过 E 公司从 5 人小团队到平台化 DataOps 的案例，展示了这套方法论在真实场景中的落地过程和量化效果。案例中的变化也呼应了精益企业实践的观点：组织能力的提升来自价值流优化、快速实验、反馈闭环和跨职能协作，而不是单纯扩大团队规模（Humble, Molesky and O'Reilly 2015）。
docs/zh/part8/ch25_data_versioning_experiment_tracking.md	62	Khanna and Tan 2001	谱系管理（Lineage Management）是对文件夹管理的系统升级。数据溯源研究长期区分“为什么出现这条结果”和“这条结果从哪里来”，并通过过程、实体和活动关系描述数据生成链路（Buneman, Khanna and Tan 2001; Moreau and Missier 2013）。它不仅记录数据的"存在状态"，还记录数据的"生成历史"：这个数据集是从哪些数据源加工而来，经过了哪些处理步骤，每个步骤产生了什么样的变化，最...
docs/zh/part8/ch25_data_versioning_experiment_tracking.md	74	Leisch and Peng 2014	场景一：实验可重现。算法团队六个月后想重跑一个历史实验，需要找到当时的数据版本。计算科学中的可复现实践强调，应将原始数据、处理脚本、运行环境和结果一起纳入记录，而不是只保存最终输出（Stodden, Leisch and Peng 2014）。如果有版本管理，可以直接通过实验 ID 找到对应的数据集版本号，进而还原训练环境。
docs/zh/part8/ch25_data_versioning_experiment_tracking.md	294	Kühl and Hirschl 2023	结果回写的含义是：当一次实验的评测结果出来后，不只是把结果写入实验卡片，还要把结果"回写"到数据集的元数据中，形成双向关联。生产级 ML 平台通常要求训练流水线、元数据存储、验证组件和模型注册系统形成闭环，否则实验结果无法稳定反哺数据治理（Baylor et al. 2017; Kreuzberger, Kühl and Hirschl 2023）：
docs/zh/part8/ch25_data_versioning_experiment_tracking.md	447	Plale and Gannon 2005	谱系治理规则是数据团队约定的一套"数据行为准则"，规定了哪些操作是被允许的、哪些需要审批、哪些是被禁止的。数据溯源综述指出，血缘信息只有与查询、审计、调试和复现需求结合，才会真正产生工程价值（Simmhan, Plale and Gannon 2005）。
docs/zh/part8/ch25_data_versioning_experiment_tracking.md	576	Leisch and Peng 2014	这次快速回溯之所以成功，依赖于以下几个关键的版本管理设计。可复现计算研究反复强调，只有把数据、代码、环境和结果绑定记录，失败实验才能成为可分析资产，而不是一次性事故（Peng 2011; Stodden, Leisch and Peng 2014）：
docs/zh/part8/ch26_data_platform_observability.md	72	Kühl and Hirschl 2023	这些故障模式的共同特点是：表面的系统指标健康，但实质的数据健康已经出问题。生产 ML 平台需要同时关注数据、模型、基础设施和业务反馈，才能覆盖这类跨层故障（Amershi et al. 2019; Kreuzberger, Kühl and Hirschl 2023）。传统的基础设施监控体系无法感知这类问题，需要专门针对数据内容的质量监控来覆盖。
docs/zh/part9/ch27_data_catalog_and_metadata_governance.md	179	Golab and Naumann 2015	对于结构信息，可以通过扫描数据库 schema、parquet 文件头、JSON 文件样本等自动提取；借助数据剖析（data profiling）技术，还能从样本中自动推断字段类型、取值范围和潜在约束（Abedjan, Golab and Naumann 2015）。对于血缘信息，可以从数据处理的 DAG 中自动识别。对于质量指标，可以通过定期的数据质量检查任务自动更新。对于访问记录，可以从审计日志...
docs/zh/part9/ch27_data_catalog_and_metadata_governance.md	230	Khanna and Tan 2001	数据血缘在数据库研究中有一个更经典的名字——数据溯源（data provenance）。围绕"某条结果数据为什么会是现在的值""它由哪些输入、经哪些操作产生"这两类问题，研究者发展出了 why-provenance、where-provenance 等不同粒度的刻画（Buneman, Khanna and Tan 2001），并在此后二十年里形成了覆盖数据库、工作流与脚本计算的系统性方法论（Herschel, Diestelkäm...
docs/zh/part9/ch28_data_productization_and_data_contracts.md	38	Costa and Santos 2022	数据产品（Data Product）这一概念，近年来随着数据网格（Data Mesh）架构的兴起而被广泛讨论（Dehghani 2022; Machado, Costa and Santos 2022）。其核心主张是：数据应当像面向用户的软件产品一样被对待——它有明确的消费者、有承诺的服务质量、有专门的负责人，并以可预期的方式演进。
docs/zh/part9/ch28_data_productization_and_data_contracts.md	42	Urma and Lawrence 2022	这一视角与机器学习系统工程中的普遍经验相呼应：部署在真实环境中的 ML 系统，其可靠性往往不取决于模型本身，而取决于围绕数据建立的工程纪律是否扎实（Paleyes, Urma and Lawrence 2022; Lwakatare et al. 2020）。当数据被当作产品来运营时，这种工程纪律就有了明确的载体。
docs/zh/part9/ch28_data_productization_and_data_contracts.md	103	Lee and Wang 1997	Quality 契约约定数据的质量底线。它把抽象的"数据质量好"拆解为一组可度量的指标：完整率、有效率、去重率、异常值比例、分布稳定性等（Wang and Strong 1996; Redman 1998）。Quality 契约通常与自动化质量校验工具结合，由流水线持续度量并在违约时告警（Schelter et al. 2018）。需要强调的是，质量是相对于用途而言的——同一份数据，用于粗粒度统计与用于模型训练，其质量门槛...
docs/zh/part9/ch29_data_valuation_and_reuse.md	71	Athalye and Mueller 2021	先看从数据到模型指标。一份数据能让某个离线指标上升，这当然是价值的信号，但它远不是价值的全部，也并不总是可靠。其一，指标提升可能是局部且可被替代的——同样的提升或许可以由一份成本更低的数据达成，此时这份数据的边际价值并不高。要严格衡量单份数据对模型效果的真实贡献，需要借助更原则化的方法，例如基于合作博弈中沙普利值的数据估值，它通过考察一份数据在各种数据组合中的平均边际贡献来分摊价值（Ghorbani and Zou 2019; J...
docs/zh/part9/ch29_data_valuation_and_reuse.md	73	Hitt and Kim 2011	再看从模型指标到业务价值，这中间横亘着一道更宽的鸿沟。模型某个准确率提升一个百分点，未必能转化为可感知的业务收益：提升的可能恰好是业务上不敏感的部分，可能被产品体验、响应延迟或用户信任等其他瓶颈所抵消，也可能因为部署、维护与监控的额外成本而被吞没。生产环境中机器学习系统的真实价值，往往不取决于模型指标本身，而取决于围绕数据与模型建立的工程纪律是否扎实（Sculley et al. 2015）。与此同时，数据驱动决策对企业绩效的正向...
docs/zh/part9/ch29_data_valuation_and_reuse.md	226	Athalye and Mueller 2021	评测数据的价值不在于直接提升模型，而在于它是判断一切改进是否有效的标尺。没有可靠的评测集，所有训练增益与检索命中的度量都失去了基准，29.2 中的整个价值指标体系也无从谈起。正因如此，评测集的质量至关重要——评测集中的标注错误会系统性地扭曲模型排名，让错误的改进看起来有效，让正确的改进被埋没（Northcutt, Athalye and Mueller 2021）。评测复用的收益记录应包括：该数据支撑了多少模型/版本的评估决策、覆...
docs/zh/part9/ch29_data_valuation_and_reuse.md	422	Athalye and Mueller 2021	强时效资产（如金融法规、新闻语料、客服知识库）的价值衰减快，应当高频复盘，重点关注 RAG 路径的命中率是否因内容过时而下降；稳定资产（如基础语言语料、长期有效的领域知识）价值衰减慢，可以低频复盘；评测资产则有其特殊性——它需要在每次重大模型版本或知识库更新后复盘，重点确认评测集本身是否仍然有效、是否存在泄漏风险（Northcutt, Athalye and Mueller 2021）。
docs/zh/part9/ch30_internal_data_market_and_sharing_governance.md	23	Stahl and Vossen 2013	企业内部数据市场要解决的，正是这种“数据存在但流动困难”的问题。它并不是把企业内部数据简单摆成一个目录，也不是把权限审批做成一个表单，而是把数据资产、数据产品、授权流程、使用审计、价值反馈和共享激励连接成一个可持续运行的治理系统。数据市场研究强调，市场机制的核心不只是目录展示，还包括供需匹配、交易规则、质量信号和信任机制（Schomm, Stahl and Vossen 2013）。
docs/zh/part9/ch30_internal_data_market_and_sharing_governance.md	185	Sammon and Daly 2016	为了让流程可执行，需要把各角色责任明确到关键动作。角色责任矩阵不只是项目管理工具，也是审计依据。当数据共享出现争议时，组织可以回到矩阵中判断哪个环节应承担解释、修复或改进责任。数据治理组织设计研究表明，治理职责需要根据业务复杂度、集中化程度和决策权分布进行适配，不存在一种适合所有企业的固定模式（Weber, Otto and Österle 2009; Otto 2011; Alhassan, Sammon and Daly 20...
docs/zh/part9/ch30_internal_data_market_and_sharing_governance.md	216	NIST 2020	内部数据市场的共享治理，需要在效率和安全之间取得平衡。如果所有数据都层层审批，市场会变成新的流程瓶颈，消费者最终绕开平台，回到私下找人要数据的老路。安全与隐私控制体系强调，访问控制、审计、用途约束和问责机制应当按风险分层，而不是对所有对象采用同一种强度（NIST 2020a; NIST 2020b）。如果所有数据都开放自助获取，敏感数据又会失去边界，组织难以满足审计、隐私和监管要求。因此，共享治理应遵循四个原则。
docs/zh/part9/ch30_internal_data_market_and_sharing_governance.md	252	NIST 2020	访问日志是共享治理的基础。没有日志，组织无法知道授权是否被按预期使用，也无法在风险事件发生后追踪影响范围。审计与可追踪性也是安全控制基线中的关键能力，它们让访问行为从不可见的系统事件变成可复核的治理事实（NIST 2020a）。访问日志至少应记录访问主体、访问时间、数据产品、数据版本、字段范围、查询条件、访问方式、用途标识、授权编号、返回行数和异常标记。对于高敏数据，还应记录查询来源、设备信息、网络环境、导出行为和二次加工链路。

章末参考文献未被正文引用

文件	行	序号	Key	题名	条目
docs/zh/appendix_a_tools_and_frameworks_quick_reference.md	285	1	gebru:2021	Datasheets for Datasets	Gebru T, Morgenstern J, Vecchione B, Vaughan J W, Wallach H, Daumé III H, Crawford K (2021) Datasheets for Datasets. Communications of the ACM 64(12): 86-92.
docs/zh/appendix_a_tools_and_frameworks_quick_reference.md	287	2	mitchell:2019	Model Cards for Model Reporting	Mitchell M, Wu S, Zaldivar A, Barnes P, Vasserman L, Hutchinson B, Spitzer E, Raji I D, Gebru T (2019) Model Cards for Model Reporting. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, ...
docs/zh/appendix_a_tools_and_frameworks_quick_reference.md	289	3	pushkarna:2022	Data Cards: Purposeful and Transparent Dataset Documentation for Responsible AI	Pushkarna M, Zaldivar A, Kjartansson O, Cicconi P, Chen V, Efrat A, Zou Y, Mueller J, Taly A, Ehyaei A, Karkkainen K, Marathe A, Han X, Mittal A, Schuster T, Yarmand M, Sohn H, Dwarakanath N C, McCann B (2022) Data Ca...
docs/zh/appendix_b_compliance_and_release_checklist.md	316	4	nist:2023	AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)	National Institute of Standards and Technology (2023) AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). Available at: https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework
docs/zh/appendix_b_compliance_and_release_checklist.md	318	5	regulation:2024		Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/el...
docs/zh/appendix_b_compliance_and_release_checklist.md	320	6	mitchell:2019	Model Cards for Model Reporting	Mitchell M, Wu S, Zaldivar A, Barnes P, Vasserman L, Hutchinson B, Spitzer E, Raji I D, Gebru T (2019) Model Cards for Model Reporting. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, ...
docs/zh/appendix_c_cost_estimation_and_resource_templates.md	316	1	patterson:2021	Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Training	Patterson D, Gonzalez J, Le Q, Liang C, Munguia L, Rothchild D, So D, Texier M, Dean J (2021) Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.10350.
docs/zh/appendix_c_cost_estimation_and_resource_templates.md	318	2	narayanan:2021	Efficient Large-Scale Language Model Training on GPU Clusters Using Megatron-LM	Narayanan D, Shoeybi M, Casper J, LeGresley P, Patwary M, Catanzaro B (2021) Efficient Large-Scale Language Model Training on GPU Clusters Using Megatron-LM. In: Proceedings of the International Conference for High Pe...
docs/zh/appendix_c_cost_estimation_and_resource_templates.md	320	3	kwon:2023	Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention	Kwon W, Li Z, Zhuang S, Sheng Y, Zheng L, Yu C H, Gonzalez J E, Zhang H, Stoica I (2023) Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGOPS 29th Symposi...
docs/zh/appendix_d_paper_to_implementation_guide.md	395	1	sculley:2015	Hidden Technical Debt in Machine Learning Systems	Sculley D, Holt G, Golovin D, Davydov E, Phillips T, Ebner D, Chaudhary V, Young M, Dennison D (2015) Hidden Technical Debt in Machine Learning Systems. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28.
docs/zh/appendix_d_paper_to_implementation_guide.md	397	2	breck:2017	The ML Test Score: A Rubric for ML Production Readiness and Technical Debt Reduction	Breck E, Cai S, Nielsen E, Salib M, Sculley D (2017) The ML Test Score: A Rubric for ML Production Readiness and Technical Debt Reduction. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Big Data, pp 1123-1132.
docs/zh/appendix_d_paper_to_implementation_guide.md	399	3	gebru:2021	Datasheets for Datasets	Gebru T, Morgenstern J, Vecchione B, Vaughan J W, Wallach H, Daum茅 III H, Crawford K (2021) Datasheets for Datasets. Communications of the ACM 64(12): 86-92.
docs/zh/appendix_d_paper_to_implementation_guide.md	401	4	mitchell:2019	Model Cards for Model Reporting	Mitchell M, Wu S, Zaldivar A, Barnes P, Vasserman L, Hutchinson B, Spitzer E, Raji I D, Gebru T (2019) Model Cards for Model Reporting. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, ...
docs/zh/appendix_d_paper_to_implementation_guide.md	403	5	pushkarna:2022	Data Cards: Purposeful and Transparent Dataset Documentation for Responsible AI	Pushkarna M, Zaldivar A, Kjartansson O, Cicconi J, Chen V, Efrat A, Zou Y, Mueller J, Taly A, Ehyaei A, Karkkainen K, Marathe A, Han X, Mittal A, Schuster T, Yarmand M, Sohn H, Dwarakanath N C, McCann B (2022) Data Ca...
docs/zh/appendix_e_common_bug_debugging_manual.md	447	1	sculley:2015	Hidden Technical Debt in Machine Learning Systems	Sculley D, Holt G, Golovin D, Davydov E, Phillips T, Ebner D, Chaudhary V, Young M, Dennison D (2015) Hidden Technical Debt in Machine Learning Systems. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28.
docs/zh/appendix_e_common_bug_debugging_manual.md	449	2	breck:2017	The ML Test Score: A Rubric for ML Production Readiness and Technical Debt Reduction	Breck E, Cai S, Nielsen E, Salib M, Sculley D (2017) The ML Test Score: A Rubric for ML Production Readiness and Technical Debt Reduction. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Big Data, pp 1123-1132.
docs/zh/appendix_e_common_bug_debugging_manual.md	451	3	amershi:2019	Software Engineering for Machine Learning: A Case Study	Amershi S, Begel A, Bird C, Devanbu P, Gall H, Kamar E, Nagappan N, Nushi B, Zimmermann T (2019) Software Engineering for Machine Learning: A Case Study. In: Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Softwar...
docs/zh/appendix_e_common_bug_debugging_manual.md	453	4	google:2016	Site Reliability Engineering: How Google Runs Production Systems	Google SRE (2016) Site Reliability Engineering: How Google Runs Production Systems. O'Reilly Media.
docs/zh/appendix_f_terminology_and_chinese_english_mapping.md	401	1	mitchell:2019	Model Cards for Model Reporting	Mitchell M, Wu S, Zaldivar A, Barnes P, Vasserman L, Hutchinson B, Spitzer E, Raji I D, Gebru T (2019) Model Cards for Model Reporting. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, ...
docs/zh/appendix_f_terminology_and_chinese_english_mapping.md	403	2	gebru:2021	Datasheets for Datasets	Gebru T, Morgenstern J, Vecchione B, Vaughan J W, Wallach H, Daum茅 III H, Crawford K (2021) Datasheets for Datasets. Communications of the ACM 64(12): 86-92.
docs/zh/appendix_f_terminology_and_chinese_english_mapping.md	405	3	pushkarna:2022	Data Cards: Purposeful and Transparent Dataset Documentation for Responsible AI	Pushkarna M, Zaldivar A, Kjartansson O, Cicconi J, Chen V, Efrat A, Zou Y, Mueller J, Taly A, Ehyaei A, Karkkainen K, Marathe A, Han X, Mittal A, Schuster T, Yarmand M, Sohn H, Dwarakanath N C, McCann B (2022) Data Ca...
docs/zh/appendix_f_terminology_and_chinese_english_mapping.md	407	4	iso:2022		ISO/IEC 22989:2022 Information technology - Artificial intelligence - Artificial intelligence concepts and terminology.
docs/zh/appendix_g_mindspore_note.md	51	1	mindspore:2026	MindSpore Documentation	MindSpore Contributors (2026) MindSpore Documentation. Available at: https://www.mindspore.cn/view/en.
docs/zh/appendix_g_mindspore_note.md	53	2	mindspore:2026	MindSpore source repository	MindSpore Contributors (2026) MindSpore source repository. Available at: https://github.com/mindspore-ai/mindspore.
docs/zh/appendix_g_mindspore_note.md	55	3	mindspore:2026	Automatic Differentiation, MindSpore Tutorials	MindSpore Contributors (2026) Automatic Differentiation, MindSpore Tutorials. Available at: https://www.mindspore.cn/tutorials/en/r2.9.0/beginner/autograd.html.
docs/zh/part1/ch01_data_change.md	314	13	heafield:2011	KenLM: Faster and Smaller Language Model Queries	Heafield K (2011) KenLM: Faster and Smaller Language Model Queries. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pp 187-197.
docs/zh/part1/ch01_data_change.md	316	14	broder:1997	On the Resemblance and Containment of Documents	Broder A Z (1997) On the Resemblance and Containment of Documents. In: Proceedings of the Compression and Complexity of Sequences, pp 21-29.
docs/zh/part1/ch01_data_change.md	340	26	bloom:1970	Space/time Trade-offs in Hash Coding with Allowable Errors	Bloom B H (1970) Space/time Trade-offs in Hash Coding with Allowable Errors. Communications of the ACM 13(7):422-426.
docs/zh/part1/ch02_quality_framework.md	488	1	cohen:1960	A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales	Cohen J (1960) A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20(1):37-46.
docs/zh/part1/ch02_quality_framework.md	501	7	chen:2021	Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code (HumanEval)	Chen M, Tworek J, Jun H, Yuan Q, Pinto H P d O, Kaplan J, Edwards H, Burda Y, Joseph N, Brockman G, others (2021) Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code (HumanEval). arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374.
docs/zh/part1/ch02_quality_framework.md	503	8	cobbe:2021	Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems (GSM8K)	Cobbe K, Kosaraju V, Bavarian M, Chen M, Jun H, Kaiser L, Plappert M, Tworek J, Hilton J, Nakano R, Hesse C, Schulman J (2021) Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems (GSM8K). arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14168.
docs/zh/part1/ch02_quality_framework.md	505	9	hendrycks:2021	Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU)	Hendrycks D, Burns C, Basart S, Zou A, Mazeika M, Song D, Steinhardt J (2021) Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU). In: International Conference on Learning Representations.
docs/zh/part1/ch02_quality_framework.md	507	10	broder:1997	On the Resemblance and Containment of Documents	Broder A Z (1997) On the Resemblance and Containment of Documents. In: Proceedings of the Compression and Complexity of Sequences, pp 21-29.
docs/zh/part1/ch02_quality_framework.md	509	11	heafield:2011	KenLM: Faster and Smaller Language Model Queries	Heafield K (2011) KenLM: Faster and Smaller Language Model Queries. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pp 187-197.
docs/zh/part1/ch03_data_stack.md	341	3	broder:1997	On the Resemblance and Containment of Documents	Broder A Z (1997) On the Resemblance and Containment of Documents. In: Proceedings of the Compression and Complexity of Sequences, pp 21-29.
docs/zh/part1/ch03_data_stack.md	343	4	heafield:2011	KenLM: Faster and Smaller Language Model Queries	Heafield K (2011) KenLM: Faster and Smaller Language Model Queries. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pp 187-197.
docs/zh/part10/ch31_agent_architecture.md	576	1	besta:2024	Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Models	Besta M, Blach N, Kubicek A, Gerstenberger R, Podstawski M, Gianinazzi L, Gajda J, Lehmann T, Niewiadomski H, Nyczyk P, Hoefler T (2024) Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Models. In: Pr...
docs/zh/part10/ch31_agent_architecture.md	578	2	gao:2023	PAL: Program-aided Language Models	Gao L, Madaan A, Zhou S, Alon U, Liu P, Yang Y, Callan J, Neubig G (2023) PAL: Program-aided Language Models. In: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp 10764-10799.
docs/zh/part10/ch31_agent_architecture.md	580	3	karpas:2022	MRKL Systems: A Modular, Neuro-Symbolic Architecture That Combines Large Language Models, External Knowledge Sources and Discrete Reasoning	Karpas E, Abend O, Belinkov Y, Lenz B, Lieber O, Ratner N, Shoham Y, Bata H, Levine Y, Leyton-Brown K, Muhlgay D, Rozen N, Schwartz E, Shashua A, Shuster K, Tenenbaum J, Wolf L, Zettlemoyer L, Riedel S (2022) MRKL Sys...
docs/zh/part10/ch31_agent_architecture.md	582	4	kreuzberger:2023	Machine Learning Operations (MLOps): Overview, Definition, and Architecture	Kreuzberger D, Kühl N, Hirschl S (2023) Machine Learning Operations (MLOps): Overview, Definition, and Architecture. IEEE Access 11:31866-31879.
docs/zh/part10/ch31_agent_architecture.md	584	5	madaan:2023	Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback	Madaan A, Tandon N, Gupta P, Hallinan S, Gao L, Wiegreffe S, Alon U, Dziri N, Prabhumoye S, Yang Y, Gupta S, Majumder B P, Hermann K, Welleck S, Yazdanbakhsh A, Clark P (2023) Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Se...
docs/zh/part10/ch31_agent_architecture.md	586	6	mialon:2023	Augmented Language Models: A Survey	Mialon G, Dessì R, Lomeli M, Nalmpantis C, Pasunuru R, Raileanu R, Rozière B, Schick T, Dwivedi-Yu J, Celikyilmaz A, Grave E, LeCun Y, Scialom T (2023) Augmented Language Models: A Survey. Transactions on Machine Lear...
docs/zh/part10/ch31_agent_architecture.md	588	7	nakano:2021	WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback	Nakano R, Hilton J, Balaji S, Wu J, Ouyang L, Kim C, Hesse C, Jain S, Kosaraju V, Saunders W, Jiang X, Cobbe K, Eloundou T, Krueger G, Button K, Knight M, Chess B, Schulman J (2021) WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-a...
docs/zh/part10/ch31_agent_architecture.md	590	8	nist:2023	Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)	NIST (2023) Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). National Institute of Standards and Technology.
docs/zh/part10/ch31_agent_architecture.md	592	9	nist:2024	Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile	NIST (2024) Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile. NIST AI 600-1.
docs/zh/part10/ch31_agent_architecture.md	594	10	park:2023	Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior	Park J S, O'Brien J C, Cai C J, Morris M R, Liang P, Bernstein M S (2023) Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Tec...
docs/zh/part10/ch31_agent_architecture.md	596	11	patil:2023	Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIs	Patil S G, Zhang T, Wang X, Gonzalez J E (2023) Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.15334.
docs/zh/part10/ch31_agent_architecture.md	598	12	qin:2024	ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIs	Qin Y, Liang S, Ye Y, Zhu K, Yan L, Lu Y, Lin Y, Cong X, Tang X, Qian B, Zhao S, Tian R, Xie R, Zhou J, Gerstein M, Li D, Liu Z, Sun M (2024) ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world API...
docs/zh/part10/ch31_agent_architecture.md	600	13	schick:2023	Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools	Schick T, Dwivedi-Yu J, Dessì R, Raileanu R, Lomeli M, Hambro E, Zettlemoyer L, Cancedda N, Scialom T (2023) Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing...
docs/zh/part10/ch31_agent_architecture.md	602	14	shinn:2023	Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning	Shinn N, Cassano F, Gopinath A, Narasimhan K, Yao S (2023) Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36.
docs/zh/part10/ch31_agent_architecture.md	604	15	wang:2023	A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents	Wang L, Ma C, Feng X, Zhang Z, Yang H, Zhang J, Chen Z, Tang J, Chen X, Lin Y, Zhao W X, Wei Z, Wen J-R (2023) A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.11432.
docs/zh/part10/ch31_agent_architecture.md	606	16	wu:2023	AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation	Wu Q, Bansal G, Zhang J, Wu Y, Li B, Zhu E, Jiang L, Zhang X, Zhang S, Liu J, Awadallah A H, White R W, Burger D, Wang C (2023) AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation. arXiv preprint ...
docs/zh/part10/ch31_agent_architecture.md	608	17	xi:2023	The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey	Xi Z, Chen W, Guo X, He W, Ding Y, Hong B, Zhang M, Wang J, Jin S, Zhou E, Zheng R, Fan X, Wang X, Xiong L, Zhou Y, Wang W, Jiang C, Zou Y, Liu X, Yin Z, Dou S, Weng R, Cheng W, Zhang Q, Qin W, Zheng Y, Qiu X, Huang X...
docs/zh/part10/ch31_agent_architecture.md	610	18	yao:2023	ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models	Yao S, Zhao J, Yu D, Du N, Shafran I, Narasimhan K, Cao Y (2023) ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models. In: International Conference on Learning Representations.
docs/zh/part10/ch31_agent_architecture.md	612	19	yao:2023	Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models	Yao S, Yu D, Zhao J, Shafran I, Griffiths T L, Cao Y, Narasimhan K (2023) Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36.
docs/zh/part10/ch32_auto_collection_parsing_cleaning.md	415	1	barbaresi:2021	Trafilatura: A Web Scraping Library and Command-Line Tool for Text Discovery and Extraction	Barbaresi A (2021) Trafilatura: A Web Scraping Library and Command-Line Tool for Text Discovery and Extraction. In: Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 122-131.
docs/zh/part10/ch32_auto_collection_parsing_cleaning.md	417	2	blecher:2023	Nougat: Neural Optical Understanding for Academic Documents	Blecher N, Cresci G, Ballas N, Bautista M (2023) Nougat: Neural Optical Understanding for Academic Documents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.13418.
docs/zh/part10/ch32_auto_collection_parsing_cleaning.md	419	3	carlini:2021	Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models	Carlini N, Tramer F, Wallace E, Jagielski M, Herbert-Voss A, Lee K, Roberts A, Brown T, Song D, Erlingsson U, Oprea A, Raffel C (2021) Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models. In: Proceedings of the 30th U...
docs/zh/part10/ch32_auto_collection_parsing_cleaning.md	421	4	chen:2024	Data-Juicer: A One-Stop Data Processing System for Large Language Models	Chen J, Yan X, Lin D, Qu X, Wang Y, Huang X, Zhao Z, Yu T, Zhang Z, Li H, Zheng Y, Xu R, Zhu J, Qiu X (2024) Data-Juicer: A One-Stop Data Processing System for Large Language Models. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD ...
docs/zh/part10/ch32_auto_collection_parsing_cleaning.md	423	5	chowdhery:2022	PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways	Chowdhery A, Narang S, Devlin J, Bosma M, Mishra G, Roberts A, Barham P, Chung H W, Sutton C, Gehrmann S, Schuh P, Shi K, Tsvyashchenko S, Maynez J, Rao A, Barnes P, Tay Y, Shazeer N, Prabhakaran V, Reif E, Du N, Hutc...
docs/zh/part10/ch32_auto_collection_parsing_cleaning.md	425	6	dodge:2021	Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpus	Dodge J, Sap M, Marasović A, Agnew W, Ilharco G, Groeneveld D, Mitchell M, Gardner M (2021) Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpus. In: Proceedings of the 2021 Conference ...
docs/zh/part10/ch32_auto_collection_parsing_cleaning.md	427	7	gao:2020	The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modeling	Gao L, Biderman S, Black S, Golding L, Hoppe T, Foster C, Phang J, He H, Thite A, Nabeshima N, Presser S, Leahy C (2020) The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.00027.
docs/zh/part10/ch32_auto_collection_parsing_cleaning.md	429	8	huang:2022	LayoutLMv3: Pre-training for Document AI with Unified Text and Image Masking	Huang Y, Lv T, Cui L, Lu Y, Wei F (2022) LayoutLMv3: Pre-training for Document AI with Unified Text and Image Masking. In: Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp 4083-4091.
docs/zh/part10/ch32_auto_collection_parsing_cleaning.md	431	9	kim:2022	OCR-free Document Understanding Transformer	Kim G, Hong T, Yim M, Nam J, Park J, Yim J, Hwang W, Yun S, Han D, Park S (2022) OCR-free Document Understanding Transformer. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp 498-517.
docs/zh/part10/ch32_auto_collection_parsing_cleaning.md	433	10	laurencon:2022	The BigScience ROOTS Corpus: A 1.6TB Composite Multilingual Dataset	Laurençon H, Saulnier L, Wang T, Akiki C, del Moral A V, Le Scao T, Von Werra L, Mou C, González Ponferrada E, Nguyen H, Frohberg J, Šaško M, Lhoest Q, McMillan-Major A, Dupont G, Biderman S, Rogers A, Allal L B, De T...
docs/zh/part10/ch32_auto_collection_parsing_cleaning.md	435	11	lee:2022	Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Better	Lee K, Ippolito D, Nystrom A, Zhang C, Eck D, Callison-Burch C, Carlini N (2022) Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Better. In: Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computationa...
docs/zh/part10/ch32_auto_collection_parsing_cleaning.md	437	12	longpre:2023	The Data Provenance Initiative: A Large Scale Audit of Dataset Licensing and Attribution in AI	Longpre S, Mahari R, Lee A, et al. (2023) The Data Provenance Initiative: A Large Scale Audit of Dataset Licensing and Attribution in AI. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.16787.
docs/zh/part10/ch32_auto_collection_parsing_cleaning.md	439	13	nguyen:2024	CulturaX: A Cleaned, Enormous, and Multilingual Dataset for Large Language Models in 167 Languages	Nguyen T, et al. (2024) CulturaX: A Cleaned, Enormous, and Multilingual Dataset for Large Language Models in 167 Languages. In: Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Lang...
docs/zh/part10/ch32_auto_collection_parsing_cleaning.md	441	14	ortiz:2020	A Monolingual Approach to Contextualized Word Embeddings for Mid-Resource Languages	Ortiz Suárez P J, Sagot B, Romary L (2020) A Monolingual Approach to Contextualized Word Embeddings for Mid-Resource Languages. In: Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pp 1703-1714.
docs/zh/part10/ch32_auto_collection_parsing_cleaning.md	443	15	pfitzmann:2022	DocLayNet: A Large Human-Annotated Dataset for Document-Layout Analysis	Pfitzmann B, Auer C, Dolfi M, Nassar A S, Staar P (2022) DocLayNet: A Large Human-Annotated Dataset for Document-Layout Analysis. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Minin...
docs/zh/part10/ch32_auto_collection_parsing_cleaning.md	445	16	penedo:2024	The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scale	Penedo G, Kydlíček H, Allal L B, Lozhkov A, Mitchell M, Raffel C, von Werra L, Wolf T (2024) The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scale. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Sys...
docs/zh/part10/ch32_auto_collection_parsing_cleaning.md	447	17	penedo:2023	The RefinedWeb Dataset for Falcon LLM: Outperforming Curated Corpora with Web Data Only	Penedo G, Malartic Q, Hesslow D, Cojocaru R, Cappelli A, Alobeidli H, Pannier B, Almazrouei E, Launay J (2023) The RefinedWeb Dataset for Falcon LLM: Outperforming Curated Corpora with Web Data Only. In: Advances in N...
docs/zh/part10/ch32_auto_collection_parsing_cleaning.md	449	18	raffel:2020	Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer	Raffel C, Shazeer N, Roberts A, Lee K, Narang S, Matena M, Zhou Y, Li W, Liu P J (2020) Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer. Journal of Machine Learning Research 21(140):1...
docs/zh/part10/ch32_auto_collection_parsing_cleaning.md	451	19	soldaini:2024	Dolma: An Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Research	Soldaini L, Kinney R, Bhagia A, Schwenk D, Atkinson D, Authur A, Bogin B, Chen X, Dumas G, Elazar Y, Hofmann V, Jha A H, Kumar S, Lucy L, Lyu X, Lambert N, Magnusson I, Morrison J, Muennighoff N, Naik A, Nam G, Peters...
docs/zh/part10/ch32_auto_collection_parsing_cleaning.md	453	20	wenzek:2020	CCNet: Extracting High Quality Monolingual Datasets from Web Crawl Data	Wenzek G, Lachaux M-A, Conneau A, Chaudhary V, Guzmán F, Joulin A, Grave E (2020) CCNet: Extracting High Quality Monolingual Datasets from Web Crawl Data. In: Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation ...
docs/zh/part10/ch33_labeling_synthesis_evaluation.md	432	1	alemohammad:2024	Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MAD	Alemohammad S, Casco-Rodriguez J, Luzi L, et al. (2024) Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MAD. In: International Conference on Learning Representations.
docs/zh/part10/ch33_labeling_synthesis_evaluation.md	434	2	bai:2022	Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback	Bai Y, Kadavath S, Kundu S, et al. (2022) Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.08073.
docs/zh/part10/ch33_labeling_synthesis_evaluation.md	436	3	cui:2023	UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedback	Cui G, Yuan L, Ding N, Yao G, Zhu W, Ni Y, Xie G, Liu Z, Sun M (2023) UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.01377.
docs/zh/part10/ch33_labeling_synthesis_evaluation.md	438	4	dubois:2023	AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedback	Dubois Y, Li X, Taori R, Zhang T, Gulrajani I, Ba J, Guestrin C, Liang P, Hashimoto T B (2023) AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedback. In: Advances in Neural Information Processi...
docs/zh/part10/ch33_labeling_synthesis_evaluation.md	440	5	gerstgrasser:2024	Is Model Collapse Inevitable? Breaking the Curse of Recursion by Accumulating Real and Synthetic Data	Gerstgrasser M, Schaeffer R, Dey A, et al. (2024) Is Model Collapse Inevitable? Breaking the Curse of Recursion by Accumulating Real and Synthetic Data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.01413.
docs/zh/part10/ch33_labeling_synthesis_evaluation.md	442	6	kim:2024	Prometheus: Inducing Fine-grained Evaluation Capability in Language Models	Kim S, Shin J, Cho Y, Jang J, Longpre S, Lee H, Yun S, Shin S, Kim S, Thorne J, Seo M (2024) Prometheus: Inducing Fine-grained Evaluation Capability in Language Models. In: International Conference on Learning Represe...
docs/zh/part10/ch33_labeling_synthesis_evaluation.md	444	7	kim:2024	Prometheus 2: An Open Source Language Model Specialized in Evaluating Other Language Models	Kim S, Suk J, Longpre S, Lin B Y, Shin J, Welleck S, Neubig G, Lee M, Lee K, Seo M (2024) Prometheus 2: An Open Source Language Model Specialized in Evaluating Other Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.01535.
docs/zh/part10/ch33_labeling_synthesis_evaluation.md	446	8	koh:2021	WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts	Koh P W, Sagawa S, Marklund H, et al. (2021) WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts. In: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp 5637-5664.
docs/zh/part10/ch33_labeling_synthesis_evaluation.md	448	9	lambert:2024	RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling	Lambert N, Pyatkin V, Morrison J, Miranda L, Lin B Y, Chandu K, Dziri N, Kumar S, Zick T, Choi Y, Smith N A, Hajishirzi H (2024) RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.1...
docs/zh/part10/ch33_labeling_synthesis_evaluation.md	450	10	liang:2023	Holistic Evaluation of Language Models	Liang P, Bommasani R, Lee T, et al. (2023) Holistic Evaluation of Language Models. Transactions on Machine Learning Research.
docs/zh/part10/ch33_labeling_synthesis_evaluation.md	452	11	liu:2023	G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment	Liu Y, Iter D, Xu Y, et al. (2023) G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment. In: Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp 2511-2522.
docs/zh/part10/ch33_labeling_synthesis_evaluation.md	454	12	lin:2024	WildBench: Benchmarking LLMs with Challenging Tasks from Real Users in the Wild	Lin B Y, et al. (2024) WildBench: Benchmarking LLMs with Challenging Tasks from Real Users in the Wild. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.04770.
docs/zh/part10/ch33_labeling_synthesis_evaluation.md	456	13	ouyang:2022	Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback	Ouyang L, Wu J, Jiang X, Almeida D, Wainwright C, Mishkin P, Zhang C, Agarwal S, Slama K, Ray A, Schulman J, Hilton J, Kelton F, Miller L, Simens M, Askell A, Welinder P, Christiano P, Leike J, Lowe R (2022) Training ...
docs/zh/part10/ch33_labeling_synthesis_evaluation.md	458	14	perez:2022	Red Teaming Language Models with Language Models	Perez E, Huang S, Song F, Cai T, Ring R, Aslanides J, Glaese A, McAleese N, Irving G (2022) Red Teaming Language Models with Language Models. In: Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Lang...
docs/zh/part10/ch33_labeling_synthesis_evaluation.md	460	15	rafailov:2023	Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model	Rafailov R, Sharma A, Mitchell E, Manning C D, Ermon S, Finn C (2023) Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36.
docs/zh/part10/ch33_labeling_synthesis_evaluation.md	462	16	ribeiro:2020	Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP Models with CheckList	Ribeiro M T, Wu T, Guestrin C, Singh S (2020) Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP Models with CheckList. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 4902-4912.
docs/zh/part10/ch33_labeling_synthesis_evaluation.md	464	17	shumailov:2024	AI models collapse when trained on recursively generated data	Shumailov I, Shumaylov Z, Zhao Y, et al. (2024) AI models collapse when trained on recursively generated data. Nature 631:755-759.
docs/zh/part10/ch33_labeling_synthesis_evaluation.md	466	18	wang:2023	Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions	Wang Y, Kordi Y, Mishra S, et al. (2023) Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions. In: Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 13484-...
docs/zh/part10/ch33_labeling_synthesis_evaluation.md	468	19	zheng:2023	Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena	Zheng L, Chiang W-L, Sheng Y, et al. (2023) Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36.
docs/zh/part10/ch33_labeling_synthesis_evaluation.md	470	20	zhu:2023	JudgeLM: Fine-tuned Large Language Models are Scalable Judges	Zhu L, Wang X, Wang Y, et al. (2023) JudgeLM: Fine-tuned Large Language Models are Scalable Judges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.17631.
docs/zh/part10/ch33_labeling_synthesis_evaluation.md	472	21	zhou:2023	LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment	Zhou C, Liu P, Xu P, et al. (2023) LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36.
docs/zh/part10/ch34_dataops_agent.md	468	1	amershi:2019	Software Engineering for Machine Learning: A Case Study	Amershi S, Begel A, Bird C, Devanbu P, Gall H, Kamar E, Nagappan N, Nushi B, Zimmermann T (2019) Software Engineering for Machine Learning: A Case Study. In: Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Softwar...
docs/zh/part10/ch34_dataops_agent.md	470	2	breck:2019	Data Validation for Machine Learning	Breck E, Polyzotis N, Roy S, Whang S E, Zinkevich M (2019) Data Validation for Machine Learning. In: Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems 1, pp 334-347.
docs/zh/part10/ch34_dataops_agent.md	472	3	dang:2019	AIOps: Real-World Challenges and Research Innovations	Dang Y, Lin Q, Huang P (2019) AIOps: Real-World Challenges and Research Innovations. In: Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings, pp 4-5.
docs/zh/part10/ch34_dataops_agent.md	474	4	he:2021	A Survey on Automated Log Analysis for Reliability Engineering	He S, He P, Chen Z, Yang T, Su Y, Lyu M R (2021) A Survey on Automated Log Analysis for Reliability Engineering. ACM Computing Surveys 54(6):1-37.
docs/zh/part10/ch34_dataops_agent.md	476	5	huyen:2022	Designing Machine Learning Systems: An Iterative Process for Production-Ready Applications	Huyen C (2022) Designing Machine Learning Systems: An Iterative Process for Production-Ready Applications. O'Reilly Media.
docs/zh/part10/ch34_dataops_agent.md	478	6	kreuzberger:2023	Machine Learning Operations (MLOps): Overview, Definition, and Architecture	Kreuzberger D, Kühl N, Hirschl S (2023) Machine Learning Operations (MLOps): Overview, Definition, and Architecture. IEEE Access 11:31866-31879.
docs/zh/part10/ch34_dataops_agent.md	480	7	makinen:2021	Who Needs MLOps: What Data Scientists Seek to Accomplish and How Can MLOps Help? In: Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/ACM 1st Workshop on AI Engineering - Software Engineering for AI, pp 109-112	Makinen S, Skogstrom H, Laaksonen E, Mikkonen T (2021) Who Needs MLOps: What Data Scientists Seek to Accomplish and How Can MLOps Help? In: Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/ACM 1st Workshop on AI Engineering - Software En...
docs/zh/part10/ch34_dataops_agent.md	482	8	lwakatare:2020	Large-scale Machine Learning Systems in Real-world Industrial Settings: A Review of Challenges and Solutions	Lwakatare L E, Raj A, Crnkovic I, Bosch J, Olsson H H (2020) Large-scale Machine Learning Systems in Real-world Industrial Settings: A Review of Challenges and Solutions. Information and Software Technology 127:106368.
docs/zh/part10/ch34_dataops_agent.md	484	9	nist:2023	Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)	NIST (2023) Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). National Institute of Standards and Technology.
docs/zh/part10/ch34_dataops_agent.md	486	10	nist:2024	Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile	NIST (2024) Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile. NIST AI 600-1.
docs/zh/part10/ch34_dataops_agent.md	488	11	paleyes:2022	Challenges in Deploying Machine Learning: A Survey of Case Studies	Paleyes A, Urma R-G, Lawrence N D (2022) Challenges in Deploying Machine Learning: A Survey of Case Studies. ACM Computing Surveys 55(6):1-29.
docs/zh/part10/ch34_dataops_agent.md	490	12	sambasivan:2021	"Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work": Data Cascades in High-Stakes AI	Sambasivan N, Kapania S, Highfill H, Akrong D, Paritosh P, Aroyo L M (2021) "Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work": Data Cascades in High-Stakes AI. In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Huma...
docs/zh/part10/ch34_dataops_agent.md	492	13	tamburri:2020	Sustainable MLOps: Trends and Challenges	Tamburri D A (2020) Sustainable MLOps: Trends and Challenges. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing, pp 17-23.
docs/zh/part10/ch34_dataops_agent.md	494	14	testi:2022	MLOps: A Taxonomy and a Methodology	Testi M, Ballabio M, Frontoni E, Iannello G, Moccia S, Soda P, Vessio G (2022) MLOps: A Taxonomy and a Methodology. IEEE Access 10:63606-63618.
docs/zh/part10/ch34_dataops_agent.md	496	15	treveil:2020	Introducing MLOps: How to Scale Machine Learning in the Enterprise	Treveil M, Omont N, Stenac C, Lefevre K, Phan D, Zentici J, Lavoillotte A, Miyazaki M, Heidmann L (2020) Introducing MLOps: How to Scale Machine Learning in the Enterprise. O'Reilly Media.
docs/zh/part10/ch34_dataops_agent.md	498	16	vela:2022	Temporal quality degradation in AI models	Vela D, Sharp A, Zhang R, Nguyen T, Hoang A, Pianykh O S (2022) Temporal quality degradation in AI models. Scientific Reports 12:11654.
docs/zh/part10/ch34_dataops_agent.md	500	17	zhu:2019	Tools and Benchmarks for Automated Log Parsing	Zhu J, He S, Liu J, He P, Xie Q, Zheng Z, Lyu M R (2019) Tools and Benchmarks for Automated Log Parsing. In: Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice, ...
docs/zh/part10/ch35_security_permission_collaboration.md	466	1	andriushchenko:2024	Jailbreaking Leading Safety-Aligned LLMs with Simple Adaptive Attacks	Andriushchenko M, Croce F, Flammarion N, Hein M (2024) Jailbreaking Leading Safety-Aligned LLMs with Simple Adaptive Attacks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.02151.
docs/zh/part10/ch35_security_permission_collaboration.md	468	2	chen:2024	StruQ: Defending Against Prompt Injection with Structured Queries	Chen S, Piet J, Sitawarin C, Wagner D (2024) StruQ: Defending Against Prompt Injection with Structured Queries. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.06363.
docs/zh/part10/ch35_security_permission_collaboration.md	470	3	debenedetti:2024	AgentDojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agents	Debenedetti E, Zhang J, Balunović M, et al. (2024) AgentDojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agents. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37.
docs/zh/part10/ch35_security_permission_collaboration.md	472	4	ganguli:2022	Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learned	Ganguli D, Lovitt L, Kernion J, Askell A, Bai Y, Kadavath S, Mann B, Perez E, Schiefer N, Ndousse K, Jones A, Bowman S R, Chen A, Conerly T, DasSarma N, Drain D, Elhage N, El-Showk S, Fort S, Hatfield-Dodds Z, Henigha...
docs/zh/part10/ch35_security_permission_collaboration.md	474	5	greshake:2023	Not What You've Signed Up For: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injection	Greshake K, Abdelnabi S, Mishra S, et al. (2023) Not What You've Signed Up For: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injection. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM Workshop on Artificia...
docs/zh/part10/ch35_security_permission_collaboration.md	476	6	hendrycks:2021	The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalization	Hendrycks D, Mazeika M, Zou A, Patel S, Zhu C, Navarro J, Mu J, Song D, Li B, Steinhardt J (2021) The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CV...
docs/zh/part10/ch35_security_permission_collaboration.md	478	7	huang:2024	Catastrophic Jailbreak of Open-source LLMs via Exploiting Generation	Huang Y, Gupta S, Xia M, Li K, Chen D (2024) Catastrophic Jailbreak of Open-source LLMs via Exploiting Generation. In: International Conference on Learning Representations.
docs/zh/part10/ch35_security_permission_collaboration.md	480	8	lapid:2023	Open Sesame! Universal Black Box Jailbreaking of Large Language Models	Lapid R, Langberg R, Sipper M (2023) Open Sesame! Universal Black Box Jailbreaking of Large Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.01446.
docs/zh/part10/ch35_security_permission_collaboration.md	482	9	liu:2023	Prompt Injection Attack against LLM-Integrated Applications	Liu Y, Deng G, Li Y, et al. (2023) Prompt Injection Attack against LLM-Integrated Applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05499.
docs/zh/part10/ch35_security_permission_collaboration.md	484	10	perez:2022	Red Teaming Language Models with Language Models	Perez E, Huang S, Song F, Cai T, Ring R, Aslanides J, Glaese A, McAleese N, Irving G (2022) Red Teaming Language Models with Language Models. In: Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Lang...
docs/zh/part10/ch35_security_permission_collaboration.md	486	11	ruan:2024	Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated Sandbox	Ruan Y, Dong H, Wang A, Pitis S, Zhou Y, Ba J, Dubois Y, Maddison C J, Hashimoto T B (2024) Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated Sandbox. In: International Conference on Learning Representations.
docs/zh/part10/ch35_security_permission_collaboration.md	488	12	tian:2023	Evil Geniuses: Delving into the Safety of LLM-based Agents	Tian Y, Yang X, Zhang J, Dong Y, Su H (2023) Evil Geniuses: Delving into the Safety of LLM-based Agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.11855.
docs/zh/part10/ch35_security_permission_collaboration.md	490	13	toyer:2024	Tensor Trust: Interpretable Prompt Injection Attacks from an Online Game	Toyer S, Watkins O, Mendes E A, Svegliato J, Bailey L, Wang T, Ong I, Elmaaroufi K, Abbeel P, Darrell T, Ritter A, Russell S (2024) Tensor Trust: Interpretable Prompt Injection Attacks from an Online Game. In: Interna...
docs/zh/part10/ch35_security_permission_collaboration.md	492	14	wallace:2024	The Instruction Hierarchy: Training LLMs to Prioritize Privileged Instructions	Wallace E, Xiao K, Leike R, Weng L, Heidecke J, Beutel A (2024) The Instruction Hierarchy: Training LLMs to Prioritize Privileged Instructions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.13208.
docs/zh/part10/ch35_security_permission_collaboration.md	494	15	wei:2023	Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?	Wei A, Haghtalab N, Steinhardt J (2023) Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail? arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02483.
docs/zh/part10/ch35_security_permission_collaboration.md	496	16	yi:2023	Benchmarking and Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Models	Yi J, Xie Y, Zhu B, Hines K, Kiciman E, Sun G, Xie X, Wu F (2023) Benchmarking and Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.14197.
docs/zh/part10/ch35_security_permission_collaboration.md	498	17	zhan:2024	InjecAgent: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injections in Tool-Integrated Large Language Model Agents	Zhan Q, Liang Z, Ying Z, Kang D (2024) InjecAgent: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injections in Tool-Integrated Large Language Model Agents. In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, pp 10...
docs/zh/part10/ch35_security_permission_collaboration.md	500	18	zou:2023	Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models	Zou A, Wang Z, Carlini N, Nasr M, Kolter J Z, Fredrikson M (2023) Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.15043.
docs/zh/part11/ch36_compliance_framework_and_governance.md	1180	5	european:2022	Data Protection Engineering	European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) (2022) Data Protection Engineering. ENISA Report.
docs/zh/part11/ch36_compliance_framework_and_governance.md	1186	8	hoepman:2014	Privacy Design Strategies	Hoepman J-H (2014) Privacy Design Strategies. In IFIP International Information Security Conference, pp 446-459.
docs/zh/part11/ch36_compliance_framework_and_governance.md	1190	10	dwork:2008	Differential Privacy: A Survey of Results	Dwork C (2008) Differential Privacy: A Survey of Results. In Theory and Applications of Models of Computation, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 1-19.
docs/zh/part11/ch37_federated_learning_and_privacy_preserving_technologies.md	448	4	dwork:2011	Differential Privacy	Dwork C (2011) Differential Privacy. In Encyclopedia of Cryptography and Security, Springer US, pp 338-340.
docs/zh/part12/ch38_structbill_cn_dataset.md	354	1	bai:2025	Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report	Bai, S., Chen, K., Liu, X., et al. (2025). Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13923.
docs/zh/part12/ch38_structbill_cn_dataset.md	356	2	blecher:2023	Nougat: Neural Optical Understanding for Academic Documents	Blecher, L., Cucurull, G., Scialom, T., and Stojnic, R. (2023). Nougat: Neural Optical Understanding for Academic Documents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.13418.
docs/zh/part12/ch38_structbill_cn_dataset.md	358	3	huang:2022	LayoutLMv3: Pre-training for Document AI with Unified Text and Image Masking. Proc	Huang, Y., Lv, T., Cui, L., Lu, Y., and Wei, F. (2022). LayoutLMv3: Pre-training for Document AI with Unified Text and Image Masking. Proc. ACM Multimedia.
docs/zh/part12/ch38_structbill_cn_dataset.md	360	4	huang:2019	ICDAR2019 Competition on Scanned Receipt OCR and Information Extraction	Huang, Z., Chen, K., He, J., Bai, X., Karatzas, D., Lu, S., and Jawahar, C.V. (2019). ICDAR2019 Competition on Scanned Receipt OCR and Information Extraction. Proc. ICDAR, pp. 1516–1520.
docs/zh/part12/ch38_structbill_cn_dataset.md	362	5	hu:2021	LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models	Hu, E.J., Shen, Y., Wallis, P., Allen-Zhu, Z., Li, Y., Wang, S., Wang, L., and Chen, W. (2021). LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685.
docs/zh/part12/ch38_structbill_cn_dataset.md	364	6	jaume:2019	FUNSD: A Dataset for Form Understanding in Noisy Scanned Documents	Jaume, G., Ekenel, H.K., and Thiran, J.-P. (2019). FUNSD: A Dataset for Form Understanding in Noisy Scanned Documents. ICDAR Workshop.
docs/zh/part12/ch38_structbill_cn_dataset.md	366	7	kuhn:1955	The Hungarian Method for the Assignment Problem	Kuhn, H.W. (1955). The Hungarian Method for the Assignment Problem. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 2(1–2), pp. 83–97.
docs/zh/part12/ch38_structbill_cn_dataset.md	368	8	levenshtein:1965	Binary Codes Capable of Correcting Deletions, Insertions and Reversals	Levenshtein, V.I. (1965). Binary Codes Capable of Correcting Deletions, Insertions and Reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady, 10, pp. 707–710.
docs/zh/part12/ch38_structbill_cn_dataset.md	370	9	liu:2024	A Survey on Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models	Liu, H., Xue, W., Chen, Y., et al. (2024). A Survey on Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.00253.
docs/zh/part12/ch38_structbill_cn_dataset.md	372	10	mathew:2021	DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Images	Mathew, M., Karatzas, D., and Jawahar, C.V. (2021). DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Images. Proc. WACV.
docs/zh/part12/ch38_structbill_cn_dataset.md	374	11	niu:2025	MinerU 2.5: A Decoupled Vision-Language Model for Efficient High-Resolution Document Parsing	Niu, J., Liu, Z., Gu, Z., et al. (2025). MinerU 2.5: A Decoupled Vision-Language Model for Efficient High-Resolution Document Parsing. arXiv preprint.
docs/zh/part12/ch38_structbill_cn_dataset.md	376	12	park:2019	CORD: A Consolidated Receipt Dataset for Post-OCR Parsing	Park, S., Shin, S., Lee, B., et al. (2019). CORD: A Consolidated Receipt Dataset for Post-OCR Parsing. NeurIPS Workshop on Document Intelligence.
docs/zh/part12/ch38_structbill_cn_dataset.md	378	13	rafailov:2024	Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model Is Secretly a Reward Model	Rafailov, R., Sharma, A., Mitchell, E., Ermon, S., Manning, C.D., and Finn, C. (2024). Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model Is Secretly a Reward Model. Proc. NeurIPS.
docs/zh/part12/ch38_structbill_cn_dataset.md	380	14	schulman:2017	Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms	Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., and Klimov, O. (2017). Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347.
docs/zh/part12/ch38_structbill_cn_dataset.md	382	15	shao:2024	DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models	Shao, Z., Wang, P., et al. (2024). DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300.
docs/zh/part12/ch38_structbill_cn_dataset.md	384	16	tianchi:2022	CHIP 2022 Shared Task: Medical Invoice OCR Element Extraction Dataset	Tianchi, A. and CHIP Committee (2022). CHIP 2022 Shared Task: Medical Invoice OCR Element Extraction Dataset. Aliyun Tianchi Platform.
docs/zh/part12/ch38_structbill_cn_dataset.md	386	17	xu:2020	LayoutLM: Pre-training of Text and Layout for Document Image Understanding. Proc	Xu, Y., Li, M., Cui, L., Huang, S., Wei, F., and Zhou, M. (2020). LayoutLM: Pre-training of Text and Layout for Document Image Understanding. Proc. ACM SIGKDD, pp. 1192–1200.
docs/zh/part12/ch38_structbill_cn_dataset.md	388	18	xue:2021	TGRNet: A Table Graph Reconstruction Network for Table Structure Recognition	Xue, W., Yu, B., Wang, W., Tao, D., and Li, Q. (2021). TGRNet: A Table Graph Reconstruction Network for Table Structure Recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.10598.
docs/zh/part12/ch38_structbill_cn_dataset.md	390	19	yang:2023	Modeling Entities as Semantic Points for Visual Information Extraction in the Wild	Yang, Z., Long, R., Wang, P., et al. (2023). Modeling Entities as Semantic Points for Visual Information Extraction in the Wild. Proc. CVPR.
docs/zh/part12/ch38_structbill_cn_dataset.md	392	20	zhang:2022	CBLUE: A Chinese Biomedical Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmark	Zhang, N., Chen, M., Bi, Z., et al. (2022). CBLUE: A Chinese Biomedical Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmark. Proc. ACL, pp. 7888–7915.
docs/zh/part12/ch38_structbill_cn_dataset.md	394	21	zhong:2020	Image-based Table Recognition: Data, Model, and Evaluation	Zhong, X., ShafieiBavani, E., and Jimeno Yepes, A. (2020). Image-based Table Recognition: Data, Model, and Evaluation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.13534.
docs/zh/part12/ch39_sparse_table_bench_dataset.md	280	1	zhong:2020	Image-based Table Recognition: Data, Model, and Evaluation	1. Zhong, X., ShafieiBavani, E., & Yepes, A. J. (2020). Image-based Table Recognition: Data, Model, and Evaluation. ECCV 2020.
docs/zh/part12/ch39_sparse_table_bench_dataset.md	281	2	smock:2022	PubTables-1M: Towards Comprehensive Table Extraction From Unstructured Documents	2. Smock, B., Pesala, R., & Abraham, R. (2022). PubTables-1M: Towards Comprehensive Table Extraction From Unstructured Documents. CVPR 2022.
docs/zh/part12/ch39_sparse_table_bench_dataset.md	282	3	zhu:2021	TAT-QA: A Question Answering Benchmark on a Hybrid of Tabular and Textual Content in Finance	3. Zhu, F., Lei, W., Huang, Y., Wang, C., Zhang, S., Lv, J., Feng, F., & Chua, T.-S. (2021). TAT-QA: A Question Answering Benchmark on a Hybrid of Tabular and Textual Content in Finance. ACL 2021.
docs/zh/part12/ch39_sparse_table_bench_dataset.md	283	4	pandas:2026	pandas Documentation	4. Pandas Development Team. (2026). pandas Documentation. https://pandas.pydata.org/docs/
docs/zh/part12/ch39_sparse_table_bench_dataset.md	284	5	apache:2026	Apache Arrow Documentation	5. Apache Arrow Contributors. (2026). Apache Arrow Documentation. https://arrow.apache.org/docs/
docs/zh/part12/ch40_multi_chart_infographic_reasoning_dataset.md	217	1	masry:2022	ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning	1. Masry, A., Long, D. X., Tan, J. Q., Joty, S., & Hoque, E. (2022). ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning. ACL 2022.
docs/zh/part12/ch40_multi_chart_infographic_reasoning_dataset.md	218	2	methani:2020	PlotQA: Reasoning over Scientific Plots	2. Methani, N., Ganguly, P., Khapra, M. M., & Kumar, P. (2020). PlotQA: Reasoning over Scientific Plots. WACV 2020.
docs/zh/part12/ch40_multi_chart_infographic_reasoning_dataset.md	219	3	kahou:2017	FigureQA: An Annotated Figure Dataset for Visual Reasoning	3. Kahou, S. E., Michalski, V., Atkinson, A., Kádár, Á., Trischler, A., & Bengio, Y. (2017). FigureQA: An Annotated Figure Dataset for Visual Reasoning. arXiv:1710.07300.
docs/zh/part12/ch40_multi_chart_infographic_reasoning_dataset.md	220	4	kafle:2018	DVQA: Understanding Data Visualizations via Question Answering	4. Kafle, K., Price, B., Cohen, S., & Kanan, C. (2018). DVQA: Understanding Data Visualizations via Question Answering. CVPR 2018.
docs/zh/part12/ch40_multi_chart_infographic_reasoning_dataset.md	221	5	mathew:2021	DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Images	5. Mathew, M., Karatzas, D., & Jawahar, C. V. (2021). DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Images. WACV 2021.
docs/zh/part12/ch40_multi_chart_infographic_reasoning_dataset.md	222	6	masry:2025		6. Masry, A., Islam, M. S., Ahmed, M., Bajaj, A., Kabir, F., Kartha, A., ... & Joty, S. (2025, July). Chartqapro: A more diverse and challenging benchmark for chart question answering. In Findings of the Association f...
docs/zh/part12/ch40_multi_chart_infographic_reasoning_dataset.md	223	7	xie:2026	Infochartqa: A benchmark for multimodal question answering on infographic charts	7. Xie, T., Lin, M., Liu, M., Ye, Y., Chen, C., & Liu, S. (2026). Infochartqa: A benchmark for multimodal question answering on infographic charts. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 38.
docs/zh/part12/ch40_multi_chart_infographic_reasoning_dataset.md	224	8	foroutan:2025		8. Foroutan, N., Romanou, A., Ansaripour, M., Eisenschlos, J. M., Aberer, K., & Lebret, R. (2025, July). Wikimixqa: a multimodal benchmark for question answering over tables and charts. In Findings of the Association ...
docs/zh/part12/ch40_multi_chart_infographic_reasoning_dataset.md	225	9	zhu:2025		9. Zhu, Z., Jia, M., Zhang, Z., Li, L., & Jiang, M. (2025, April). MultiChartQA: Benchmarking vision-language models on multi-chart problems. In Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapte...
docs/zh/part12/ch42_voice_style_control_dataset.md	390	1	an:2024	FunAudioLLM: Voice Understanding and Generation Foundation Models for Natural Interaction Between Humans and LLMs	An K, Chen Q, Deng C, Du Z, Gao C, Gao Z, Gu Y, He T, Hu H, Hu K, others (2024) FunAudioLLM: Voice Understanding and Generation Foundation Models for Natural Interaction Between Humans and LLMs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2...
docs/zh/part12/ch42_voice_style_control_dataset.md	394	3	du:2024	CosyVoice: A Scalable Multilingual Zero-shot Text-to-speech Synthesizer based on Supervised Semantic Tokens	Du Z, Chen Q, Zhang S, Hu K, Lu H, Yang Y, Hu H, Zheng S, Gu Y, Ma Z, Gao Z, Yan Z (2024) CosyVoice: A Scalable Multilingual Zero-shot Text-to-speech Synthesizer based on Supervised Semantic Tokens. arXiv preprint arX...
docs/zh/part12/ch42_voice_style_control_dataset.md	396	4	du:2024	CosyVoice 2: Scalable Streaming Speech Synthesis with Large Language Models	Du Z, Wang Y, Chen Q, Shi X, Lv X, Zhao T, Gao Z, Yang Y, Gao C, Wang H, others (2024) CosyVoice 2: Scalable Streaming Speech Synthesis with Large Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.10117.
docs/zh/part12/ch42_voice_style_control_dataset.md	398	5	mittag:2021	NISQA: A Deep CNN-Self-Attention Model for Multidimensional Speech Quality Prediction with Crowdsourced Datasets	Mittag G, Naderi B, Chehadi A, Möller S (2021) NISQA: A Deep CNN-Self-Attention Model for Multidimensional Speech Quality Prediction with Crowdsourced Datasets. In: Interspeech 2021, pp 2127-2131.
docs/zh/part12/ch42_voice_style_control_dataset.md	402	7	yang:2025	Qwen3 Technical Report	Yang A, Li A, Yang B, Zhang B, Hui B, Zheng B, Yu B, Gao C, Huang C, Lv C, others (2025) Qwen3 Technical Report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388.
docs/zh/part12/ch43_latent_switch_69k.md	287	1	wei:2022	Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models	1. Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q. V., & Zhou, D. (2022). Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models. NeurIPS 2022.
docs/zh/part12/ch43_latent_switch_69k.md	288	2	lightman:2023	Let's Verify Step by Step	2. Lightman, H., Kosaraju, V., Burda, Y., Edwards, H., Baker, B., Lee, T., Leike, J., Schulman, J., Sutskever, I., & Cobbe, K. (2023). Let's Verify Step by Step. arXiv:2305.20050.
docs/zh/part12/ch43_latent_switch_69k.md	289	3	yao:2023	ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models	3. Yao, S., Zhao, J., Yu, D., Du, N., Shafran, I., Narasimhan, K., & Cao, Y. (2023). ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models. arXiv:2210.03629.
docs/zh/part12/ch43_latent_switch_69k.md	290	4	deepseekai:2025	DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning	4. DeepSeek-AI. (2025). DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning.
docs/zh/part12/ch43_latent_switch_69k.md	291	5	hendrycks:2021	Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset	5. Hendrycks, D., Burns, C., Kadavath, S., Arora, A., Basart, S., Tang, E., Song, D., & Steinhardt, J. (2021). Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset. NeurIPS 2021.
docs/zh/part13/ch44_pretrain_recipes.md	275	1	bavarian:2022	Efficient Training of Language Models to Fill in the Middle (FIM)	Bavarian M, Jun H, Tezak N, Schulman J, McLeavey C, Tworek J, Chen M (2022) Efficient Training of Language Models to Fill in the Middle (FIM). arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.14255.
docs/zh/part13/ch44_pretrain_recipes.md	279	3	broder:1997	On the Resemblance and Containment of Documents	Broder A Z (1997) On the Resemblance and Containment of Documents. In: Proceedings of the Compression and Complexity of Sequences, pp 21-29.
docs/zh/part13/ch44_pretrain_recipes.md	285	6	hoffmann:2022	Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models (Chinchilla)	Hoffmann J, Borgeaud S, Mensch A, Buchatskaya E, Cai T, Rutherford E, de Las Casas D, Hendricks L A, Welbl J, Clark A, others (2022) Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models (Chinchilla). arXiv preprint arXiv:22...
docs/zh/part13/ch44_pretrain_recipes.md	295	11	sennrich:2016	Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Units (BPE)	Sennrich R, Haddow B, Birch A (2016) Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Units (BPE). In: Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 1715-1725.
docs/zh/part13/ch45_posttrain_recipes.md	357	1	wang:2023	Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions	Wang Y, Kordi Y, Mishra S, Liu A, Smith N A, Khashabi D, Hajishirzi H (2023) Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Comp...
docs/zh/part13/ch45_posttrain_recipes.md	363	4	ethayarajh:2024	Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization	Ethayarajh K, Xu W, Muennighoff N, Jurafsky D, Kiela D (2024) Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization. Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning, pp 12634-12651.
docs/zh/part13/ch45_posttrain_recipes.md	365	5	gheshlaghi:2024	A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences	Gheshlaghi Azar M, Guo Z D, Piot B, Munos R, Rowland M, Valko M, Calandriello D (2024) A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on ...
docs/zh/part13/ch45_posttrain_recipes.md	367	6	grattafiori:2024	The Llama 3 Herd of Models	Grattafiori A, Dubey A, Jauhri A, Pandey A, Kadian A, Al-Dahle A, Letman A, Mathur A, Schelten A, Vaughan A, others (2024) The Llama 3 Herd of Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783.
docs/zh/part13/ch45_posttrain_recipes.md	369	7	lambert:2025	Tülu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training	Lambert N, Morrison J, Pyatkin V, Huang S, Ivison H, Brahman F, Miranda L J V, Liu A, Dziri N, Lyu X, Gu Y, Malik S, Graf V, Hwang J D, Yang J, Le Bras R, Tafjord O, Wilhelm C, Soldaini L, Smith N A, Wang Y, Dasigi P,...
docs/zh/part13/ch45_posttrain_recipes.md	371	8	yang:2025	Qwen3 Technical Report	Yang A, Li A, Yang B, Zhang B, Hui B, Zheng B, Yu B, Gao C, Huang C, Lv C, others (2025) Qwen3 Technical Report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388.
docs/zh/part13/ch45_posttrain_recipes.md	377	11	xu:2025	Magpie: Alignment Data Synthesis from Scratch by Prompting Aligned LLMs with Nothing	Xu Z, Jiang F, Niu L, Deng Y, Poovendran R, Choi Y, Lin B Y (2025) Magpie: Alignment Data Synthesis from Scratch by Prompting Aligned LLMs with Nothing. International Conference on Learning Representations.
docs/zh/part13/ch45_posttrain_recipes.md	383	14	singhal:2024	A Long Way to Go: Investigating Length Correlations in RLHF	Singhal P, Goyal T, Xu J, Durrett G (2024) A Long Way to Go: Investigating Length Correlations in RLHF. First Conference on Language Modeling.
docs/zh/part13/ch45_posttrain_recipes.md	385	15	zhou:2023	Don't Make Your LLM an Evaluation Benchmark Cheater	Zhou K, Zhu Y, Chen Z, Chen W, Zhao W X, Chen X, Lin Y, Wen J-R, Han J (2023) Don't Make Your LLM an Evaluation Benchmark Cheater. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.01964.
docs/zh/part13/ch45_posttrain_recipes.md	387	16	lightman:2024	Let's Verify Step by Step	Lightman H, Kosaraju V, Burda Y, Edwards H, Baker B, Lee T, Leike J, Schulman J, Sutskever I, Cobbe K (2024) Let's Verify Step by Step. International Conference on Learning Representations.
docs/zh/part13/ch46_rl_reasoning_data.md	544	2	team:2025	Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMs	Team Kimi, Du A, Gao B, Xing B, Jiang C, Chen C, Li C, Xiao C, Du C, Liao C, others (2025) Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12599.
docs/zh/part13/ch46_rl_reasoning_data.md	546	3	touvron:2023	Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models	Touvron H, Martin L, Stone K, Albert P, Almahairi A, Babaei Y, Bashlykov N, Batra S, Bhargava P, Bhosale S, others (2023) Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288.
docs/zh/part13/ch46_rl_reasoning_data.md	552	6	zhou:2023	LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment	Zhou C, Liu P, Xu P, Iyer S, Sun J, Mao Y, Ma X, Efrat A, Yu P, Yu L, Zhang S, Ghosh G, Lewis M, Zettlemoyer L, Levy O (2023) LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 55...
docs/zh/part13/ch46_rl_reasoning_data.md	554	7	zelikman:2022	STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning with Reasoning	Zelikman E, Wu Y, Mu J, Goodman N (2022) STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning with Reasoning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 15476-15488.
docs/zh/part13/ch46_rl_reasoning_data.md	556	8	madaan:2023	Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback	Madaan A, Tandon N, Gupta P, Hallinan S, Gao L, Wiegreffe S, Alon U, Dziri N, Prabhumoye S, Yang Y, Gupta S, Majumder B P, Hermann K, Welleck S, Yazdanbakhsh A, Clark P (2023) Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Se...
docs/zh/part13/ch46_rl_reasoning_data.md	558	9	lightman:2024	Let's Verify Step by Step	Lightman H, Kosaraju V, Burda Y, Edwards H, Baker B, Lee T, Leike J, Schulman J, Sutskever I, Cobbe K (2024) Let's Verify Step by Step. International Conference on Learning Representations.

其余 158 条见 JSON 明细。

外部核验问题条目

文件	行	序号	状态	来源	分数	标识	问题	题名	匹配题名
docs/zh/appendix_b_compliance_and_release_checklist.md	310	1	url-problem	url	0.000	https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-11/07/content_5129723.htm	url-status:404
docs/zh/appendix_b_compliance_and_release_checklist.md	312	2	url-problem	url	0.000	https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-06/11/content_5616919.htm	url-status:404
docs/zh/appendix_b_compliance_and_release_checklist.md	314	3	url-problem	url	0.000	https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-08/20/content_5632486.htm	url-status:404
docs/zh/part12/ch38_structbill_cn_dataset.md	394	21	metadata-mismatch	arxiv	0.365	2011.13534	title-mismatch	Image-based Table Recognition: Data, Model, and Evaluation	A Survey of Deep Learning Approaches for OCR and Document Understanding
docs/zh/part12/ch41_medimage_tool_vqa_dataset.md	563	10	metadata-mismatch	crossref-doi	0.394	10.1038/s41592-024-02499-w	title-mismatch	BiomedParse: A biomedical foundation model for image parsing of everything everywhere all at once	A foundation model for joint segmentation, detection and recognition of biomedical objects across nine modalities
docs/zh/part13/ch44_pretrain_recipes.md	287	7	metadata-mismatch	arxiv	0.433	2412.15115	title-mismatch	Qwen2.5: A Party of Foundation Models	Qwen2.5 Technical Report
docs/zh/part13/ch45_posttrain_recipes.md	381	13	metadata-mismatch	arxiv	0.569	2410.18451	title-mismatch		Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMs
docs/zh/part13/ch47_vlm_data_recipes.md	344	15	metadata-mismatch	arxiv	0.262	2306.04764	title-mismatch	MiniGPT-4 / MMC4: An Open Large-Scale Dataset of Interleaved Image-Text Data	Entanglement Growth and Minimal Membranes in $(d+1)$ Random Unitary Circuits
docs/zh/part13/ch48_t2i_t2v.md	393	2	url-problem	url	0.000	https://www.brettcastellano.com/post/pyscenedetect	url-status:error:URLError	PySceneDetect: Python and OpenCV-based Scene Cut/Transition Detection Program
docs/zh/part14/p12_r1_reasoning_flywheel.md	431	4	metadata-mismatch	arxiv	0.450	2506.04178	title-mismatch	Open-Thoughts: Exploring Quality, Quantity, Diversity and Creativity in Reasoning Data	OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning Models
docs/zh/part14/p12_r1_reasoning_flywheel.md	435	6	metadata-mismatch	arxiv	0.433	2412.15115	title-mismatch	Qwen2.5: A Party of Foundation Models	Qwen2.5 Technical Report
docs/zh/part14/p14_video_generation.md	309	1	url-problem	url	0.000	https://www.brettcastellano.com/post/pyscenedetect	url-status:error:URLError	PySceneDetect: Python and OpenCV-based Scene Cut/Transition Detection Program
docs/zh/part2/ch05_cleaning_dedup.md	508	3	not-found	crossref-doi	0.000	10.5281/zenodo.1212303	doi-not-found	spaCy: Industrial-strength Natural Language Processing in Python
docs/zh/part4/ch14_qa.md	664	17	metadata-mismatch	crossref-doi	0.569	10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.x	title-mismatch	Reliability in Content Analysis: Some Common Misconceptions and Recommendations	Reliability in Content Analysis.
docs/zh/part4/ch14_qa.md	670	20	metadata-mismatch	crossref-doi	0.215	10.14778/3157794.3157797	title-mismatch	Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervision	Snorkel

格式问题统计

问题	数量
missing-doi-arxiv-url	604
missing-first-author	6
missing-terminal-period	48
missing-year	16
title-not-parsed	16
url-trailing-punctuation	13