Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New layout in Organization pledge page #321

Open
fcoveram opened this issue Sep 17, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

New layout in Organization pledge page #321

fcoveram opened this issue Sep 17, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@fcoveram
Copy link

URL where issue is: Organization pledge

What do you see?

I took a time to revisit the organization pledge page to see how the layout designed behaves with real content, and there is room for improvement to use better the white spaces.

Here is a screenshot of Yoast pledge.

Yoast pledge in Five for the future section in WordPress.org

Since the teams list is long, the white space in the left side make the page unbalanced.

What should be changed?

I'm drawn to try a layout that make better of use spaces. Here is an idea based on the same Yoast pledge content.

Mockup of Yoast pledge

@ryelle
Copy link
Contributor

ryelle commented Sep 17, 2024

Looks good! Would that still work for pledges like https://wordpress.org/five-for-the-future/pledge/omnisend/ ? The average pledge on the site has just 3-4 people (I don't have teams stats, but I imagine they would be similarly small).

Here's another case, the description is longer since it's both English and another language (there are at least two of these) https://wordpress.org/five-for-the-future/pledge/mowomo-2/

@fcoveram
Copy link
Author

I think the new design's layout may work well in both cases.

Since we don't have a way of changing the layout based on the content extension, the design proposed optimizes the white spaces more evenly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: 🛑 Pending discussion
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants