Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
Feedback on specific action items: I agree with
I'd like to talk about
I'd prefer to leave it where it is, but make it more visible in places where users might want to provide feedback. Some ideas:
Alternatively, I'd be fine with a 'feedback' global tab on the bottom left of the page, like a floating thing, if we want to collect a lot of feedback. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I also like all the ideas but just not sure about placing the Feedback page at the same level of About, Resources... Placing links to it on results and single result pages sounds like a good move. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
While reviewing the internal pages, content not related to a search but referring to Openverse as a tool, I discovered some content inconsistencies that we can improve. Here are my thoughts and ideas.
Showing the same on different pages
On the Our Story page, we explain Openverse’s purpose, how it started, and sources connected. I like this approach, but the Sources table is also visible on Sources page with more details.
💡 Idea: Since Sources page is focused on the integration procedure and a call for adding new ones, I suggest removing the source table on Our Story but keeping the table on Sources.
Make more visible the feedback call
The feedback form is a Resources item on the menu. We can make the call more evident and the chances of user responses might increase.
💡 Idea: Move the Feedback page out of Resources, in the same line as About, Resources, and Extension.
Being more specific about Extension
The extension link has a label that is not fully clear about what users will see. Extension of what? What might features be associated with this extension?
💡 Idea: Rename as Browser extension since are browser-only features.
❓ Question: Should we move the Browser extension landing page to some Openverse domain? I envision that in the mid-term lapse, other extensions might come.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions