Generic transports
#3314
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
FWIW, axum seems to be moving in this direction - tokio-rs/axum#2479 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
I'm definitely interested in generic transports, it would help a lot with TLS. It's something I'd like to experiment with when my backlog is cleared. Until then, if there's any ideas for a design, I'd encourage a feature request issue to be opened. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
It seems like TcpListener/TcpStream are pretty deeply embedded in the current structure. Are generic transports something you would be interested in? The goal would basically be so users can supply their own listeners and/or streams and have actix run on top of them. It would ideally also allow higher layers like the Server to be oblivious to Tcp and Uds transports for example instead of what seems like two different sets of functions today.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions