Hi SimpleMem team π
I'm Daouda, builder of LLM RAG Booster β a zero-dependency compression layer for LLM memory that achieves 8.1Γ compression with 100% integrity guarantee, using quantum-inspired gravitational encoding.
SimpleMem's core strength is semantic lossless compression of dialogue into atomic memory units. I'd like to propose an integration where LLM RAG Booster acts as a storage compression layer on top of SimpleMem's atomic entries β reducing the token footprint further when retrieving context for the LLM.
The complementarity
SimpleMem and LLM RAG Booster solve adjacent problems:
|
SimpleMem |
LLM RAG Booster |
| Focus |
Semantic compression of dialogues |
Storage compression of chunks |
| Method |
LLM-driven atomic encoding |
Gravitational Bit encoding |
| Output |
Atomic, timestamped memory units |
Compressed chunks, keyword-indexed |
| Retrieval |
Intent-aware 3-stage pipeline |
Top-K keyword scoring |
| Dependencies |
LLM API |
Zero (pure Python) |
The combination :
SimpleMem produces high-quality atomic memory units β LLM RAG Booster compresses them for storage β on retrieval, only relevant units are decompressed and passed to the LLM.
This could reduce the already-efficient SimpleMem token usage even further, especially for long-running agents with hundreds of memory units.
Concrete proposal
# Concept β SimpleMem producing atoms, Booster storing them
from simplemem import SimpleMem
from booster import GravitationalMemory
mem = SimpleMem()
store = GravitationalMemory(n_max=15) # 1,240 states per atom
# Stage 1 β SimpleMem compresses dialogue into atomic units
mem.add_dialogue("Alice", "My name is Daouda, I work on AI memory.", "2026-01-01T10:00:00")
atoms = mem.finalize() # β atomic, timestamped facts
# Stage 2 β Booster compresses and stores atoms
for atom in atoms:
store.store(atom.text, atom.timestamp)
# Stage 3 β Intent-aware retrieval + Booster decompression
answer = mem.ask("What is my name?", storage=store)
Links
Question
Would you be open to a discussion about using LLM RAG Booster as an optional storage backend in SimpleMem? I can prototype an adapter and open a draft PR.
Also curious: does SimpleMem currently have a pluggable storage interface, or is it tightly coupled to the current DB layer?
β Daouda Abdoul Anzize
π§ anzize.contact@proton.me
π¦ @Nexusstudio100
Hi SimpleMem team π
I'm Daouda, builder of LLM RAG Booster β a zero-dependency compression layer for LLM memory that achieves 8.1Γ compression with 100% integrity guarantee, using quantum-inspired gravitational encoding.
SimpleMem's core strength is semantic lossless compression of dialogue into atomic memory units. I'd like to propose an integration where LLM RAG Booster acts as a storage compression layer on top of SimpleMem's atomic entries β reducing the token footprint further when retrieving context for the LLM.
The complementarity
SimpleMem and LLM RAG Booster solve adjacent problems:
The combination :
SimpleMem produces high-quality atomic memory units β LLM RAG Booster compresses them for storage β on retrieval, only relevant units are decompressed and passed to the LLM.
This could reduce the already-efficient SimpleMem token usage even further, especially for long-running agents with hundreds of memory units.
Concrete proposal
Links
Question
Would you be open to a discussion about using LLM RAG Booster as an optional storage backend in SimpleMem? I can prototype an adapter and open a draft PR.
Also curious: does SimpleMem currently have a pluggable storage interface, or is it tightly coupled to the current DB layer?
β Daouda Abdoul Anzize
π§ anzize.contact@proton.me
π¦ @Nexusstudio100