Skip to content

Actions: apache/datafusion

Actions

Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment

Actions

Loading...
Loading

Show workflow options

Create status badge

Loading
23,181 workflow runs
23,181 workflow runs

Filter by Event

Filter by Status

Filter by Branch

Filter by Actor

Update dependencies
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #35472: Issue comment #19667 (comment) created by alamb
1s
fix: DynamicFilterPhysicalExpr violates Hash/Eq contract
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #35471: Issue comment #19659 (comment) created by adriangb
2s
Support group by all in datafusion
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #35470: Issue comment #19662 (comment) created by alamb
1s
Release DataFusion 52.0.0 (Dec 2025 / Jan 2026)
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #35468: Issue comment #18566 (comment) created by brancz
1s
fix: DynamicFilterPhysicalExpr violates Hash/Eq contract
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #35467: Issue comment #19659 (comment) created by adriangb
1s
Release DataFusion 52.0.0 (Dec 2025 / Jan 2026)
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #35466: Issue comment #18566 (comment) created by ethan-tyler
1s
Update dependencies
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #35465: Issue comment #19667 (comment) created by Jefffrey
1s
fix: DynamicFilterPhysicalExpr violates Hash/Eq contract
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #35464: Issue comment #19659 (comment) created by kumarUjjawal
1s
Feat : added truncate table support
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #35463: Issue comment #19633 (comment) created by ethan-tyler
3s
Running Clickbench query 18 fails with "failed to fill whole buffer" error
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #35462: Issue comment #19425 (comment) created by alamb
2s
feat: Add preselection_threshold option to BinaryExpr
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #35461: Issue comment #19420 (comment) created by acking-you
1s
Downgrade aws-smithy-runtime, update rust_decimal, ignore RUSTSEC-2026-0001 to get clean CI
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #35460: Issue comment #19657 (comment) created by alamb
1s
fix(accumulators): preserve state in evaluate() for window frame queries
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #35459: Issue comment #19618 (comment) created by Jefffrey
Skipped
Parquet: Push down supported list predicates (array_has/any/all) during decoding
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #35458: Issue comment #19545 (comment) created by zhuqi-lucas
2s
Add one-step FilterExec creation with projection (#19608)
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #35457: Issue comment #19619 (comment) created by GaneshPatil7517
1s
table scoped lfc
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #35456: Issue comment #19616 (comment) created by alamb
Skipped
feat: add list_files_cache table function for datafusion-cli
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #35455: Issue comment #19388 (comment) created by alamb
1s
Release DataFusion 52.0.0 (Dec 2025 / Jan 2026)
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #35454: Issue comment #18566 (comment) created by alamb
1s
Poor performance of parquet pushdown with offset
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #35453: Issue comment #19654 (comment) created by alamb
1s
Downgrade aws-smithy-runtime, update rust_decimal, ignore RUSTSEC-2026-0001 to get clean CI
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #35452: Issue comment #19657 (comment) created by alamb
1s
Parquet: Push down supported list predicates (array_has/any/all) during decoding
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #35451: Issue comment #19545 (comment) created by kosiew
2s
Parquet: Push down supported list predicates (array_has/any/all) during decoding
Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #35450: Issue comment #19545 (comment) created by kosiew
1s