Skip to content

Conversation

@DarkSharpness
Copy link
Contributor

Related discussion here #265 .

Modification in short:

  1. Add Function::FromPackedInplace in function.h and generalize some methods in registry.h
  2. Implement FFI object types overload method (all in extra/overload.h)
  3. Add a simple test.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @DarkSharpness, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly enhances the Foreign Function Interface (FFI) by implementing dynamic-style function overloading for object types. This feature allows developers to define multiple C++ methods or constructors with identical names but distinct parameter lists, which can then be seamlessly invoked from FFI bindings. The change improves the usability and expressiveness of FFI object definitions, making them more aligned with standard C++ programming patterns.

Highlights

  • Dynamic Overloading for FFI Objects: Introduced a new mechanism (OverloadObjectDef) to support dynamic-style overloading for methods and constructors of FFI object types, allowing multiple functions with the same name but different argument signatures.
  • Function::FromPackedInplace Addition: Added a new static method Function::FromPackedInplace to function.h, which enables creating a ffi::Function and simultaneously obtaining a pointer to its internal callable, essential for managing overloaded functions.
  • Generalized Function Wrapping: Refactored ReflectionDefBase in registry.h to generalize the WrapFunction and GetMethod utilities, making them more flexible and compatible with the new overloading infrastructure.
  • New Test Coverage: Included a new test file (test_overload.cc) to thoroughly validate the functionality of overloaded constructors, instance methods, and static methods for FFI objects.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a powerful feature to support overloading of FFI object methods, including constructors, instance methods, and static methods. The implementation is well-designed, with good attention to performance by minimizing virtual function calls. The changes are well-structured, with the core logic encapsulated in the new include/tvm/ffi/extra/overload.h header, and necessary supporting changes made to function.h and registry.h. The addition of tests in tests/cpp/test_overload.cc is great and covers the primary use cases. I have a couple of minor suggestions for improvement.

* under the License.
*/
/*!
* \file tvm/ffi/reflection/registry.h
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The file path in this comment is incorrect. It appears to be a copy-paste error and should be updated to reflect the correct file path.

 * \file tvm/ffi/extra/overload.h

Comment on lines +197 to +199
/// TODO: better error message
TVM_FFI_THROW(TypeError) << "No matching overload found when calling: `" << name_ << "` with "
<< num_args << " arguments.";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The current error message for a failed overload resolution is quite generic. To improve debuggability, consider enhancing the error message to include more context, such as the argument types that were provided and a list of the available overloads with their signatures. This would make it much easier for users to identify why a call failed to match any overload.

#define TVM_FFI_DLL_EXPORT_INCLUDE_METADATA 0
#endif

#if TVM_FFI_DLL_EXPORT_INCLUDE_METADATA
Copy link
Member

@junrushao junrushao Nov 26, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suppose it's fine to wildcard include sstream without the guards?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wildcard include sstream is not friendly to clangd, which gives me an annoying warning "Included header sstream is not used directly". It's just a style fix and could be removed.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see.

I’ve got bunch of similar warnings too. I managed to run clangd on this repo on mainline CI, but it only applies to .cc files instead of headers. If you have any ideas how to improve, I’m happy to walk you through what the existing infra looks like.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants