-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy path2_9
33 lines (23 loc) · 1.11 KB
/
2_9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Proof that addition and subtraction of intervals is a function
of their width :
Consider interval i1 = [l1, u1] with width w1 = (u1 - l1) / 2
and i2 = [l2, u2] with width w2 = (u2 - l2) / 2
Case 1 - Addition
We get interval iA = [(l1+l2), (u1+u2)]
The width here = ((u1+u2) - (l1+l2)) / 2 = w1 + w2
Case 2 - Subtraction
We get interval iS = [(l1 + (-u2)), (u1 + (-l2))]
The width here is also = w1 + w2
In case of multiplication and division, this does not apply.
This is because the lower-bound and upper-bound of the resultant
interval is not strictly dependent on the lower-bound and
upper-bound of i1 and i2 respectively.
For example, consider i1 = [-1, 3] (w1 = 2) and i2 = [2, 9] (w2 = 3.5)
Here addition = [1, 12] (w3 = 5.5)
subtraction = [-10, 1] (w4 = 5.5)
But in the case of multiplication we get the interval = [-9, 27]
Here -9 is the product of the lower-bound of i1 with the UPPER BOUND
of i2. And the width we get is 18.
Similarly, with division we get interval = [-1/2, 3/2] with width 1.
As we can see in neither the case of multiplication or division the
resultant widths are a function of the original widths.