Skip to content

feat(atxp): auto-discover channels and write HEARTBEAT.md for multi-c… #24

feat(atxp): auto-discover channels and write HEARTBEAT.md for multi-c…

feat(atxp): auto-discover channels and write HEARTBEAT.md for multi-c… #24

Workflow file for this run

name: AI Code Review
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, ready_for_review, synchronize]
jobs:
ai-review:
if: github.event.pull_request.draft == false
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: write
steps:
- name: Checkout PR
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- name: Run Claude PR Review
uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1
with:
anthropic_api_key: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}
github_token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
use_sticky_comment: "true"
claude_args: |
--allowedTools "Bash(gh pr diff:*),Bash(gh pr view:*),Bash(gh pr review:*),Bash(git diff:*),Bash(git log:*),Read,Glob,Grep"
prompt: |
Review pull request #${{ github.event.pull_request.number }} and post a review to GitHub.
## Step 1: Gather context
Get the PR details and diff:
```
gh pr view ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}
gh pr diff ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}
```
## Step 2: Review the code changes
Perform a thorough code review analyzing:
- Code quality and best practices
- Potential bugs or issues
- Security concerns (credentials, injection, OWASP top 10)
- Performance considerations
- Breaking changes or regressions
## Step 3: Determine review outcome
Based on findings, choose one:
- **APPROVE** (`--approve`): Code looks good, no significant issues
- **REQUEST_CHANGES** (`--request-changes`): Critical issues that must be fixed before merging
- **COMMENT** (`--comment`): Suggestions or minor issues that don't block merging
Prefer COMMENT over REQUEST_CHANGES unless there are genuine bugs, security issues, or breaking changes.
## Step 4: Post the review
Post to GitHub using:
```
gh pr review ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }} --body "YOUR_REVIEW_BODY" --approve|--request-changes|--comment
```
Format the review body as:
```markdown
## AI Code Review
**Recommendation**: APPROVE | REQUEST_CHANGES | COMMENT
### Summary
[1-2 sentence overview of what this PR does]
<details>
<summary>Actionable Feedback (N items)</summary>
- [ ] `file:line` - Description of issue or required change
- [ ] General: Description of non-file-specific feedback
</details>
<details>
<summary>Detailed Review</summary>
### Code Quality
[Analysis of code patterns, readability, maintainability]
### Security
[Any security considerations]
### Suggestions
[Optional improvements]
### Positive Notes
[What was done well]
</details>
```
**Important:** The `gh pr review` command produces no output on success. Only run it once — do not retry if there is no output, as that indicates success.