You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that the reference links we get from copying a requirement in the report relies on the target of duvet extract. Do you think that it's reasonable to decouple them?
The expected outcome would be executing duvet extract with a local file as target, but somehow being able to have urls pointing to specific sections of the desired spec in the generated report.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
eagr
changed the title
The reference links in the generated report
Reference links in annotations dependent on target argument
Aug 22, 2022
There are potentially many ways to refer to a spec and this would configure all of those resources as equivalent. So if you referred to datatracker.ietf.org or www.rfc-editor.org in your source it wouldn't matter; it would all be considered the same specification.
I noticed that the reference links we get from copying a requirement in the report relies on the target of
duvet extract
. Do you think that it's reasonable to decouple them?The expected outcome would be executing
duvet extract
with a local file as target, but somehow being able to have urls pointing to specific sections of the desired spec in the generated report.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: