You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
For each PersistentVolumeClaim that I want backed by S3, I need to provision a PersistentVolume with a prefix.
Describe the solution you'd like in detail
I can create a PersistentVolumeClaim with a s3-mountpoint (?) storageClassName. Because of this, a PersistentVolume is created with the prefix MountOption.
Describe alternatives you've considered
For each helm chart we deploy with a PVC, we can include a PV as well. But this is not a clean solution, because as a service, I don't want to worry about the technology backing my storage. I just want to create a PVC and get it over with.
Additional context
We have a cluster with multiple tenants. Each tenant has a set of services that use PVCs. Deploying and maintaining a PV for all volumes is a lot overhead and dynamic provisioning would make my setup cleaner and my life easier.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for the feature request. We're tracking a similar feature here so we'll close this and track dynamic provisioning in the posted issue. Feel free to comment on that issue, +1 it, or open a new issue if it does not cover the use case mentioned here.
/feature
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
For each PersistentVolumeClaim that I want backed by S3, I need to provision a PersistentVolume with a prefix.
Describe the solution you'd like in detail
I can create a PersistentVolumeClaim with a
s3-mountpoint
(?) storageClassName. Because of this, a PersistentVolume is created with theprefix
MountOption.Describe alternatives you've considered
For each helm chart we deploy with a PVC, we can include a PV as well. But this is not a clean solution, because as a service, I don't want to worry about the technology backing my storage. I just want to create a PVC and get it over with.
Additional context
We have a cluster with multiple tenants. Each tenant has a set of services that use PVCs. Deploying and maintaining a PV for all volumes is a lot overhead and dynamic provisioning would make my setup cleaner and my life easier.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: