You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One thing I think we should consider is showing in the Effective view the results of the property merging. So if I had:
a.bnd:
-runrequires.a: bundle.a
b.bnd:
-include: a.bnd
-runrequires.b: bundle.b
... then the effective view would be:
-runrequires: bundle.a, bundle.b
The Provenance whould then reveal where in a.bnd and b.bnd those definitions were from. If it might be useful, it could also name the original pre-merged property name alongside the file name.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As noted earlier, I like the effective view.
One thing I think we should consider is showing in the Effective view the results of the property merging. So if I had:
a.bnd:
b.bnd:
... then the effective view would be:
The Provenance whould then reveal where in a.bnd and b.bnd those definitions were from. If it might be useful, it could also name the original pre-merged property name alongside the file name.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: