Problem
Conductor workflows today are built ad hoc for each situation. There is no library of predefined, reusable use-case templates that a team could pick up and run without designing the whole flow from scratch each time. This makes it hard to standardize common processes across installs. It also blocks downstream features that assume a catalog of ready-made workflows already exists.
Proposed solution
Add a "Paperclip Process" concept to Conductor: a set of predefined, reusable use-case workflows that ship with omadia or can be authored once and reused across runs. Users would select from this library instead of building a workflow from zero each time. Issue #330 (Facilitator) depends on this, since it needs a pool of ready-made use-case workflows to draw from.
Problem
Conductor workflows today are built ad hoc for each situation. There is no library of predefined, reusable use-case templates that a team could pick up and run without designing the whole flow from scratch each time. This makes it hard to standardize common processes across installs. It also blocks downstream features that assume a catalog of ready-made workflows already exists.
Proposed solution
Add a "Paperclip Process" concept to Conductor: a set of predefined, reusable use-case workflows that ship with omadia or can be authored once and reused across runs. Users would select from this library instead of building a workflow from zero each time. Issue #330 (Facilitator) depends on this, since it needs a pool of ready-made use-case workflows to draw from.